Department of Energy obligations in Hazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal (NAICS 562211)

DOE × 562211 is a hazardous-waste join, not a site map

NAICS 562211 is a hazardous-waste treatment-and-disposal label on the award file. The dollar figure $19,945,210,914.83 applies only where agency 089 and NAICS 562211 are both present. Department of Energy is larger because it includes other industries. NAICS 562211 is larger because it includes other agencies. This tie is the intersection. The extract does not list site names, waste volumes, or cubic-yard counts.

Twenty-five actions produced the cell. Award rows are not the same as establishments in the Economic Census. A single vendor can hold several of the 25 records. The packet does not identify vendors. 25 is not equal 25 waste sites or 25 treatment plants.

25 awards behind $19.9 billion

Remediation services (562910) and other waste codes sit outside this total unless they also carry 562211. Residual or neighboring codes are easy to merge in speech and wrong to merge in this table. $19,945,210,914.83 stays inside agency 089 × NAICS 562211 only. Mean obligation is about $797.81 million, not a typical site contract and not a cost per barrel. Count is not a count of sites, tanks, or treatment plants.

Twenty-five lines are scannable on the agency table; that still does not make them a site map. This page will not invent contractor names. Open Department of Energy for stored agency rows. Do not convert 25 into a map of DOE cleanup sites or infer a waste-site census. Hanford-versus-Savannah-River folklore is not a site split in this packet. About 2.7% of $734,091,874,676.57 sits in this NAICS slice — still not a ranking.

Waste-treatment obligations are not barrels already processed

$19,945,210,914.83 is the commitment sum, not a punch-list of waste already treated. No fiscal year is in the facts. A DOE environmental-management allocation table is not this join unless it uses the same two keys and the obligation metric.

The listing title is Hazardous Waste Treatment And Disposal. This extract does not split treatment from disposal, and it does not split nuclear from chemical waste streams. EPA’s remediation-services join on this slice uses a different awarding agency and a different NAICS. Inventing those splits would leave the packet.

What the DOE 562211 table omits

Omitted fields include site names, waste volumes, or cubic-yard counts. Remaining facts: $19,945,210,914.83, 25 awards, agency 089, NAICS 562211, parent $734,091,874,676.57. Site names belong on award records if stored; they are not extra packet dollars.

NAICS 562211, All agencies, and All spending ties are related shelves. Adding them to $19,945,210,914.83 invents a share. Donations reported to the FEC do not pay these awards. Different statutes, different tables.

Where the DOE × NAICS 562211 hubs live

Cite from Department of Energy and NAICS 562211, then use All agencies and All spending ties for context. Twenty-five awards totaling $19,945,210,914.83 remain a waste-coded administrative file, not a site census. Waste volumes and site names are not in this packet. Do not annualize $19,945,210,914.83. USAspending.gov is the originating system.

How to read the DOE × 562211 pair

The relationship is mechanical: agency 089 plus NAICS 562211 roll into $19,945,210,914.83. Remove either filter and the number changes. This page never claims the pair caused the other side to exist. If you need names, leave this narrative. Waste volumes and site names are not in this packet. Readers who reuse this agency-industry snapshot should keep both keys in the same sentence, cite USAspending.gov, and treat award rows as records rather than unique vendors. This narrative does not invent a fiscal year, a recipient list, or an outlay total the packet omitted. Keep the obligation word on the headline dollar figure in every footnote. A later ingest can restate the headline dollars without changing the join itself. Do not add parent hubs into this cell. Unique recipients remain unpublished. Mean dollars per award stay a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical invoice.

Questions

How much DOE spending is coded to hazardous-waste treatment?

USAspending.gov shows $19,945,210,914.83 in obligations for Department of Energy (agency 089) coded to NAICS 562211, across 25 awards. The sum is a commitment total, not outlays and not the agency’s full $734,091,874,676.57 book. Other industries are outside this join unless they also carry 562211.

Do 25 awards mean 25 DOE waste sites?

No. Award count is a row count of 25 actions and can include continuations. It is not a count of sites, tanks, or treatment plants. The packet does not name recipients. See Department of Energy for named lines as USAspending stored them.

Is this the same as EPA Superfund spending?

No. EPA is awarding agency 068 with its own NAICS joins. This page is DOE (089) × NAICS 562211 only. Mixing the two agencies invents a combined cleanup total the packet never computed. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. Keep both sides of the join in the citation.

Has $19.9 billion already been spent on cleanup?

Not on this metric. Obligations are recorded commitments on awards. Outlays are payments from the Treasury. The $19,945,210,914.83 headline is the obligation rollup in SpendingVault’s extract. Remaining balances are not published in this packet. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.