Skip to main content
← All data ties

Department of Health and Human Services obligations in South Carolina 6th District (SC-06)

South Carolina 6th District (SC-06) shows $17,368,561,715.65 in all-agency USAspending.gov obligations on this extract. Department of Health and Human Services (agency 075) accounts for $4,008,186,341.08 of that book — about 23.1% — across 705 awards. A share of a district total is a join statistic, not a ranking of districts and not proof that uninsured rates or hospital beds explain the cell. The metric is obligations, not outlays.

Key figures

  • Department of Health and Human Services in SC-06 shows $4,008,186,341.08 in USAspending obligations on 705 awards.
  • 705 awards are a row count, not a census of hospitals, patients, or named grantees.
  • The join is agency 075 plus SC-06, not Defense 097 and not statewide South Carolina HHS.
  • The total is commitments, not outlays. FEC donations do not fund this cell.

HHS × SC-06 is not Defense on the same district

South Carolina 6th District (SC-06) also hosts a Defense cell in this slice. HHS agency 075 is a different awarding agency on the same district geography. Mixing HHS and DoD dollars invents a combined SC-06 health-plus-defense figure the packet never computed. SpendingVault sums tagged obligations: $4,008,186,341.08 on 705 awards for awarding agency 075 with South Carolina 6th District (SC-06) as place of performance. Treat the pair as a table intersection, not a ranking of districts as winners or losers, and not a claim that 705 awards equal 705 health providers. A Department of Health and Human Services amount tagged to a different district is out of this cell.

VA, Labor, or Education awards that mention health in a description sit outside $4,008,186,341.08 unless those awards also carry agency 075 and SC-06 geography. Mixing those lines would invent a combined figure the packet never computed. Correlation between this obligation sum and uninsured rates or hospital beds is not causation. Those series are not in the packet. Place of performance as SC-06 locates the tagged awards; it does not deposit $4,008,186,341.08 in a district treasury. Defense in SC-06 is a different awarding agency on the same district tag. Keep the two joins separate.

705 HHS awards in South Carolina 6th District

Seven hundred five HHS awards is a mid-thickness health file. It is not 705 hospitals or 705 named grantees. Mean obligation is about $5,685,370.70 if $4,008,186,341.08 were divided evenly across 705 lines — a mechanical ratio, not a published typical award. Award count is a row count of USAspending awards, including possible modifications. The extract does not split CMS, NIH, CDC, or ACF inside agency 075. Unique recipients are unpublished.

This page will not invent contractor or recipient names. Open South Carolina 6th District for the stored district table and Department of Health and Human Services for the national agency shelf. Do not convert 705 into a map of hospitals, patients, or named grantees inside South Carolina 6th District. The $4,008,186,341.08 total remains an obligation rollup on tagged awards. Inspect named lines on USAspending.gov rather than inferring an inventory.

SC-06 HHS obligations are not claims already paid

HHS obligations are commitments, not claims already paid. HHS awards often obligate as grants or contracts are recorded and draw as claims or invoices are processed. The $4,008,186,341.08 headline is the obligation sum on this district-agency join, not care already delivered or grants already drawn. Citing the figure as cash already sent confuses two USAspending concepts. Deobligations and upward adjustments both move the total. No fiscal year is attached to this packet; do not annualize $4,008,186,341.08 into a yearly run rate.

Keep the obligation word on $4,008,186,341.08. Keep both Department of Health and Human Services and South Carolina 6th District (SC-06) in the citation. Campaign contributions recorded on FEC.gov do not fund this USAspending cell. Different datasets can share a state abbreviation without sharing a money trail.

What the South Carolina 6th District HHS table omits

The extract has no roster of hospitals, patients, or named grantees. Facts remain $4,008,186,341.08, 705 awards, agency 075 (Department of Health and Human Services), South Carolina 6th District (SC-06), and a district-wide book of $17,368,561,715.65. This page will not invent a contractor league table. Sibling district-agency joins are separate obligation totals, not a better or worse score.

South Carolina 6th District places SC-06 among other congressional districts. Department of Health and Human Services places agency 075 among other awarding agencies. South Carolina federal spending is the statewide shelf. All spending ties indexes other pairs. Mixing those shelves would invent a share of South Carolina spending or of Department of Health and Human Services's national book the packet never computed. The $4,008,186,341.08 figure is the tagged pair only. Defense in SC-06 is a different awarding agency on the same district tag. Keep the two joins separate.

Citing Department of Health and Human Services (agency 075) in SC-06

A clean footnote names Department of Health and Human Services (agency 075), South Carolina 6th District (SC-06), $4,008,186,341.08 in obligations, and 705 awards on USAspending.gov. Keep the obligation word. Do not relabel 705 as a census of hospitals, patients, or named grantees. Quote the district overlay if you need every awarding agency in SC-06, and quote the agency page if you need Department of Health and Human Services without a district filter. About 23.1% of the $17,368,561,715.65 district book sits on this agency in the extract; that percentage is a derived ratio, not a separate published table.

A ties page exists because two tables meet. One table is awarding agency 075. The other is congressional district place of performance as SC-06. The headline $4,008,186,341.08 is the obligation sum on that intersection. It is not a forecast, not a budget request, and not an outlay. It is also not a claim that Department of Health and Human Services caused South Carolina 6th District's economy to grow, or that the district caused the awards to exist. If a later ingest moves the live overlay, prefer the overlay when the table and this snapshot diverge.

Questions

How much did HHS obligate in South Carolina 6th District?
USAspending.gov shows $4,008,186,341.08 in obligations for Department of Health and Human Services (agency 075) with South Carolina 6th District (SC-06) as place of performance, across 705 awards. The sum is a commitment total, not outlays and not the district's entire health or Medicaid budget. Other agencies in the district sit outside this join.
Do 705 awards mean 705 SC-06 hospitals?
No. Award count is a row count of USAspending awards and can include continuations. It is not a census of hospitals, patients, or named grantees. The packet does not name recipients. Mean obligation of about $5,685,370.70 is a quotient, not a typical published award. See South Carolina 6th District for stored lines.
Does this HHS cell include Defense awards in SC-06?
No. The join is awarding agency 075 crossed with SC-06 place of performance. The district-wide book on this extract is $17,368,561,715.65. Related agencies and other districts are not inside $4,008,186,341.08 unless they also carry both keys. Defense in SC-06 is a different awarding agency on the same district tag. Keep the two joins separate.
Is the SC-06 HHS total already paid as claims?
Not on this metric. Obligations are recorded commitments. Outlays are payments from the Treasury. The $4,008,186,341.08 headline is the obligation rollup in SpendingVault's extract. Draws and remaining balances are not published in this packet. Remaining balances are not in the facts.

USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to awarding agency. District 90/98 (multi/non-voting placeholders) are omitted. Obligations are not outlays.