Skip to main content
← All data ties

Housing and Urban Development in Florida 27th District (FL-27)

USAspending.gov records $1,150,608,929.46 in Department of Housing and Urban Development obligations with place of performance in Florida 27th District (FL-27). That awarding-agency 086 cell is 35.1% of the district's $3,274,207,002.72 published book—the largest HUD share in this slice. The join lists 26,288 award records, a long action file, not 26,288 named authorities. This page reports the pair, not a ranking of Florida districts.

Key figures

  • USAspending records $1,150,608,929.46 in HUD obligations in FL-27 (agency 086).
  • That cell is 35.1% of the district's $3,274,207,002.72 book—the largest HUD share here.
  • 26,288 award records are a long action list, not a PHA census.
  • The total is commitments, not outlays. FEC donations do not fund this cell.

HUD occupies a large slice of FL-27's book

Agency 086 and Florida 27th District (FL-27) meet in one place-of-performance cell. $1,150,608,929.46 is the obligation sum tagged to that pair. It is not the district's full $3,274,207,002.72 book, not every HUD dollar in Florida, and not an outlay. 35.1% is a large district share, still not a housing-unit census. The Florida 27th District hub still lists other awarding agencies.

26,288 rows against $1,150,608,929.46 is a high action count. That pattern can reflect many assistance instruments, modifications, or repeated vehicles; the packet does not say which. Treating the count as 26,288 unique PHAs invents a roster. Florida 19th District is a different HUD cell. Correlation with local housing news is not causation.

FL-27's district book beside agency 086

35.1% of $3,274,207,002.72 is tagged to Department of Housing and Urban Development in this extract. Other awarding agencies still fill the remainder. Adding those rows into $1,150,608,929.46 would overstate the HUD join. The Florida 27th District page at /districts/FL-27/ is the parent without an agency-086 filter.

Department of Housing and Urban Development at /agencies/086/ drops the FL-27 filter. Florida federal spending at /states/fl/ drops the district cut. All spending ties at /ties/ indexes other pairs. Do not treat $1,150,608,929.46 as statewide HUD obligations or as cash already paid.

26,288 records are not unique PHAs

26,288 is the join award-record count, not unique housing authorities and not a unit inventory. Dividing $1,150,608,929.46 by 26,288 would invent a typical payment the packet never computed. Named recipients remain unpublished. Keep the long row count on the join rather than stretching it into a directory.

What HUD in FL-27 omits

No outlays, no program split, no named PHAs, no FEC overlay. Campaign donations do not fund these USAspending obligations. Place of performance is a geography tag, not proof that a HUD field office sits in FL-27. Keep agency 086 and Florida 27th District on the same citation as $1,150,608,929.46.

Citing HUD in Florida 27th District

Name Department of Housing and Urban Development (agency 086), Florida 27th District (FL-27), $1,150,608,929.46 in obligations, and 26,288 award records on USAspending.gov. Quote /districts/FL-27/ for every awarding agency in FL-27 and /agencies/086/ for agency 086 without a district filter.

Reuse $1,150,608,929.46 only as HUD obligations with place of performance in FL-27. Filings remain on USAspending.gov. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset. Obligations of $1,150,608,929.46 are not outlays. Keep Department of Housing and Urban Development (agency 086) and Florida 27th District (FL-27) together when citing $1,150,608,929.46. The 26,288 award-record count is the join field, not a unique-vendor census. Obligations of $1,150,608,929.46 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. Do not add the district parent of $3,274,207,002.72 into this agency-086 cell. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. Place of performance in FL-27 is a geography tag, not a contractor roster. 35.1% is the published share of $3,274,207,002.72 tagged to Department of Housing and Urban Development in this extract. Other awarding agencies on the Florida 27th District hub sit outside $1,150,608,929.46. Reuse the figure only as the 086 × FL-27 obligation join. Later USAspending ingests can restate $1,150,608,929.46. Cite the pair as commitments, not as checks already cleared in Florida. The All spending ties index holds other keys. The join remains Department of Housing and Urban Development (agency 086) with place of performance in Florida 27th District (FL-27). $1,150,608,929.46 is the obligation total; 26,288 is the award-record count; $3,274,207,002.72 is the district parent. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays.

Questions

How much did HUD obligate in Florida 27th District?
USAspending.gov shows $1,150,608,929.46 in Department of Housing and Urban Development obligations with place of performance in Florida 27th District (FL-27). The sum is a commitment total, not outlays and not the district's $3,274,207,002.72 book. Other agencies in FL-27 sit outside this join.
Do 26,288 awards equal 26,288 housing authorities in FL-27?
No. 26,288 is the join award-record count, a long action list, not unique PHAs. The packet names no recipients. Keep agency 086 and FL-27 together when citing $1,150,608,929.46. Florida 19th District is a different HUD cell.
Does HUD dominate Florida 27th District spending?
Agency 086 is 35.1% of the district's $3,274,207,002.72 published book—a large slice, still not the whole district. Other awarding agencies remain on the Florida 27th District hub. Do not add those rows into $1,150,608,929.46.
Did FEC donations fund these HUD awards?
No. $1,150,608,929.46 is a USAspending obligation aggregate. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset and do not fund these awards. Outlays are unpublished. Cite agency 086 plus Florida 27th District (FL-27). USAspending.gov remains the source for agency 086 in FL-27.

USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to awarding agency. District 90/98 (multi/non-voting placeholders) are omitted. Obligations are not outlays.