Skip to main content
← All data ties

Department of Housing and Urban Development federal obligations in Kansas

The Department of Housing and Urban Development shows $876,032,590.67 in USAspending.gov obligations coded to Kansas, across 6,770 awards. Awarding-agency 086 and Kansas (KS) are the pair. Six thousand seven hundred seventy awards is a high-count HUD file. Recurring instruments can thicken a list without each row being a new housing units. The implied mean is about $129,399.20 per award — a quotient of two packet facts, not a typical project. USAspending.gov is the source. Amounts are obligations, not outlays.

Key figures

  • HUD in Kansas: $876,032,590.67 across 6,770 USAspending awards.
  • Implied mean about $129,399.20 per record — a packet quotient, not a typical project.
  • Agency 086 × KS is not a measure of housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households.
  • Cite obligations from USAspending.gov, not outlays.
  • Kansas federal spending and Department of Housing and Urban Development are parents, not amounts to add into $876,032,590.67.

HUD awards tagged to Kansas

Department of Housing and Urban Development as awarding agency, Kansas as place-of-performance: 6,770 records summing to $876,032,590.67. A Department of Housing and Urban Development award coded outside KS is out. An award in Kansas from a different awarding agency is out even if the topic sounds related. Kansas (KS) excludes Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Colorado. A Kansas City, Missouri-coded award is Missouri even if the metro story sounds similar.

Six thousand seven hundred seventy awards is a high-count HUD file. Recurring instruments can thicken a list without each row being a new housing units. Unique recipients are unpublished. Do not read 6,770 as 6,770 unique housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households. The overlay Department of Housing and Urban Development in Kansas is the both-keys table. Kansas federal spending is the all-agency state hub. Department of Housing and Urban Development is the agency book without an KS filter. All spending ties lists other joins.

Wichita, Topeka, and Kansas City, Kansas share one KS stamp. PIH, CPD, and other HUD components can share awarding-agency 086 without a published bureau pie. Correlation is not causation: Kansas did not cause $876,032,590.67 by existing as a large or small place. Population and outcome scores are not packet facts. The join is 086 × KS only.

6,770 rows are not 6,770 units

$876,032,590.67 does not measure housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households. Those series are not USAspending fields on this aggregate. The cell sums award obligations with awarding-agency code 086 and an KS place-of-performance tag.

Do not treat 6,770 awards as a census of housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households. Parent hubs are supposed to be larger than this pair. If Kansas federal spending or Department of Housing and Urban Development matched $876,032,590.67 and 6,770, the join would be pointless. Use the overlay when both keys must stay on. Neighbor-state HUD joins are other pairs, not addends. Dividing $876,032,590.67 by 6,770 yields about $129,399.20 per award on average. That average hides contracts, grants, and other instruments. It is not a typical HUD line and not a published median.

Kansas, not a bi-state HUD rollup

Place of performance KS is a geography tag on the award, not a metro list and not a commuting zone. Kansas (KS) excludes Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Colorado. A Kansas City, Missouri-coded award is Missouri even if the metro story sounds similar. Recipient address can differ from that state tag.

Wichita, Topeka, and Kansas City, Kansas share one KS stamp. This packet does not split $876,032,590.67 by city, county, or named facility. 6,770 awards stay statewide. A county table would be a different extract.

A thick HUD file, still obligations

Even a thick file records obligations, not necessarily outlays. $876,032,590.67 can include amounts that pay on a later schedule. Citing it as cash already sent in Kansas confuses two concepts. Deobligations and upward adjustments both move the total.

Kansas's own budget is a different ledger. Mixing it with the 6,770-award USAspending file leaves this series. No fiscal year is published in this packet, so this page does not invent one. Keep the obligation label on $876,032,590.67.

What this pair does not prove

A large HUD total in Kansas does not mean the agency caused Kansas's fiscal mix, and it does not connect these obligations to campaign contributions. Keep $876,032,590.67 labeled as agency 086 obligations with Kansas place of performance. Neighbor HUD cells among Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Colorado are separate joins. This page does not rank Kansas as a winner or loser.

Recipient names are unpublished in this packet. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to explain $876,032,590.67. Place-of-performance KS can differ from a vendor mailroom. A Kansas City, Missouri-coded award is Missouri even if the metro story sounds similar. A later ingest can restate $876,032,590.67 and 6,770 without changing the join definition: awarding agency 086 crossed with Kansas.

Citing HUD in Kansas

Cite USAspending.gov: Department of Housing and Urban Development (agency 086) obligated $876,032,590.67 on 6,770 awards coded to Kansas. Name both sides. Keep “obligations.” Do not relabel the total as housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households.

Prefer Department of Housing and Urban Development in Kansas if the overlay has refreshed after an ingest. Kansas federal spending still includes every other awarding agency tagged to KS. Department of Housing and Urban Development is the 086 parent without the KS filter. All spending ties indexes other pairs. Do not add those parents into $876,032,590.67.

A usable footnote names Department of Housing and Urban Development, Kansas, $876,032,590.67, and 6,770. The implied mean near $129,399.20 is $876,032,590.67 divided by 6,770. Means are not medians. USAspending.gov remains the originating system. FEC individual contributions are a different dataset; they do not fund this USAspending cell. Correlation is not causation.

Questions

How much has the Department of Housing and Urban Development obligated in Kansas?
USAspending.gov records $876,032,590.67 across 6,770 awards with awarding agency 086 and a Kansas tag. That is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a count of housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households. Department of Housing and Urban Development in Kansas is the live overlay for this pair. Keep both keys when quoting $876,032,590.67.
Is $876,032,590.67 a measure of housing units?
No. The packet publishes $876,032,590.67 and 6,770 awards for agency 086 inside KS coding. Those other series are unpublished here. Unique recipients are unpublished. Quote the dollar total and the award count together. Obligations are not outlays. The implied mean is about $129,399.20, a ratio of two packet facts.
Is this a Wichita-only HUD total?
No. $876,032,590.67 and 6,770 awards are statewide Kansas place of performance. Wichita, Topeka, and Kansas City, Kansas share one KS stamp. This packet does not publish a city split. A regional cut would be a different extract. Original filings remain on the source sites.
Where is the live HUD–Kansas table?
Department of Housing and Urban Development in Kansas is the overlay. Kansas federal spending and Department of Housing and Urban Development are the parents, not addends. All spending ties lists other pairs. Keep both sides of the join when citing $876,032,590.67. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays.

USAspending.gov aggregate of federal obligations by state and awarding agency. Obligations are not outlays.