How much has the Department of Housing and Urban Development obligated in Nebraska?

USAspending.gov records $830,394,898.08 across 4,745 awards with awarding agency 086 and a Nebraska tag. That is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a count of housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households. Department of Housing and Urban Development in Nebraska is the live overlay for this pair. Keep both keys when quoting $830,394,898.08.

Is $830,394,898.08 a measure of housing units?

No. The packet publishes $830,394,898.08 and 4,745 awards for agency 086 inside NE coding. Those other series are unpublished here. Unique recipients are unpublished. Quote the dollar total and the award count together. Obligations are not outlays. The implied mean is about $175,004.19, a ratio of two packet facts.

Is this a Omaha-only HUD total?

No. $830,394,898.08 and 4,745 awards are statewide Nebraska place of performance. Omaha, Lincoln, and Bellevue share one NE stamp. This packet does not publish a city split. A regional cut would be a different extract. Original filings remain on the source sites.

Where is the live HUD–Nebraska table?

Department of Housing and Urban Development in Nebraska is the overlay. Nebraska federal spending and Department of Housing and Urban Development are the parents, not addends. All spending ties lists other pairs. Keep both sides of the join when citing $830,394,898.08. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays.

← All data ties

Department of Housing and Urban Development federal obligations in Nebraska

The Department of Housing and Urban Development shows $830,394,898.08 in USAspending.gov obligations coded to Nebraska, across 4,745 awards. Awarding-agency 086 and Nebraska (NE) are the pair. Four thousand seven hundred forty-five awards is a high-count HUD file. Recurring instruments can thicken a list without each row being a new housing units. The implied mean is about $175,004.19 per award — a quotient of two packet facts, not a typical project. USAspending.gov is the source. Amounts are obligations, not outlays.

Key figures

HUD in Nebraska: $830,394,898.08 across 4,745 USAspending awards.
Implied mean about $175,004.19 per record — a packet quotient, not a typical project.
Agency 086 × NE is not a measure of housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households.
Cite obligations from USAspending.gov, not outlays.
Nebraska federal spending and Department of Housing and Urban Development are parents, not amounts to add into $830,394,898.08.

HUD awards tagged to Nebraska

Department of Housing and Urban Development as awarding agency, Nebraska as place-of-performance: 4,745 records summing to $830,394,898.08. A Department of Housing and Urban Development award coded outside NE is out. An award in Nebraska from a different awarding agency is out even if the topic sounds related. Nebraska (NE) excludes Iowa, Kansas, South Dakota, Wyoming, Colorado, and Missouri. A Council Bluffs-coded award is Iowa even if the metro story sounds similar.

Four thousand seven hundred forty-five awards is a high-count HUD file. Recurring instruments can thicken a list without each row being a new housing units. Unique recipients are unpublished. Do not read 4,745 as 4,745 unique housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households. The overlay Department of Housing and Urban Development in Nebraska is the both-keys table. Nebraska federal spending is the all-agency state hub. Department of Housing and Urban Development is the agency book without an NE filter. All spending ties lists other joins.

Omaha, Lincoln, and Bellevue share one NE stamp. PIH, CPD, and other HUD components can share awarding-agency 086 without a published bureau pie. Correlation is not causation: Nebraska did not cause $830,394,898.08 by existing as a large or small place. Population and outcome scores are not packet facts. The join is 086 × NE only.

4,745 rows are not 4,745 units

$830,394,898.08 does not measure housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households. Those series are not USAspending fields on this aggregate. The cell sums award obligations with awarding-agency code 086 and an NE place-of-performance tag.

Do not treat 4,745 awards as a census of housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households. Parent hubs are supposed to be larger than this pair. If Nebraska federal spending or Department of Housing and Urban Development matched $830,394,898.08 and 4,745, the join would be pointless. Use the overlay when both keys must stay on. Neighbor-state HUD joins are other pairs, not addends. Dividing $830,394,898.08 by 4,745 yields about $175,004.19 per award on average. That average hides contracts, grants, and other instruments. It is not a typical HUD line and not a published median.

Nebraska, not a bi-state HUD rollup

Place of performance NE is a geography tag on the award, not a metro list and not a commuting zone. Nebraska (NE) excludes Iowa, Kansas, South Dakota, Wyoming, Colorado, and Missouri. A Council Bluffs-coded award is Iowa even if the metro story sounds similar. Recipient address can differ from that state tag.

Omaha, Lincoln, and Bellevue share one NE stamp. This packet does not split $830,394,898.08 by city, county, or named facility. 4,745 awards stay statewide. A county table would be a different extract.

A thick HUD file, still obligations

Even a thick file records obligations, not necessarily outlays. $830,394,898.08 can include amounts that pay on a later schedule. Citing it as cash already sent in Nebraska confuses two concepts. Deobligations and upward adjustments both move the total.

Nebraska's own budget is a different ledger. Mixing it with the 4,745-award USAspending file leaves this series. No fiscal year is published in this packet, so this page does not invent one. Keep the obligation label on $830,394,898.08.

What this pair does not prove

A large HUD total in Nebraska does not mean the agency caused Nebraska's fiscal mix, and it does not connect these obligations to campaign contributions. Keep $830,394,898.08 labeled as agency 086 obligations with Nebraska place of performance. Neighbor HUD cells among Iowa, Kansas, South Dakota, Wyoming, Colorado, and Missouri are separate joins. This page does not rank Nebraska as a winner or loser.

Recipient names are unpublished in this packet. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to explain $830,394,898.08. Place-of-performance NE can differ from a vendor mailroom. A Council Bluffs-coded award is Iowa even if the metro story sounds similar. A later ingest can restate $830,394,898.08 and 4,745 without changing the join definition: awarding agency 086 crossed with Nebraska.

Citing HUD in Nebraska

Cite USAspending.gov: Department of Housing and Urban Development (agency 086) obligated $830,394,898.08 on 4,745 awards coded to Nebraska. Name both sides. Keep “obligations.” Do not relabel the total as housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households.

Prefer Department of Housing and Urban Development in Nebraska if the overlay has refreshed after an ingest. Nebraska federal spending still includes every other awarding agency tagged to NE. Department of Housing and Urban Development is the 086 parent without the NE filter. All spending ties indexes other pairs. Do not add those parents into $830,394,898.08.

A usable footnote names Department of Housing and Urban Development, Nebraska, $830,394,898.08, and 4,745. The implied mean near $175,004.19 is $830,394,898.08 divided by 4,745. Means are not medians. USAspending.gov remains the originating system. FEC individual contributions are a different dataset; they do not fund this USAspending cell. Correlation is not causation.

Questions

How much has the Department of Housing and Urban Development obligated in Nebraska?: USAspending.gov records $830,394,898.08 across 4,745 awards with awarding agency 086 and a Nebraska tag. That is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a count of housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households. Department of Housing and Urban Development in Nebraska is the live overlay for this pair. Keep both keys when quoting $830,394,898.08.
Is $830,394,898.08 a measure of housing units?: No. The packet publishes $830,394,898.08 and 4,745 awards for agency 086 inside NE coding. Those other series are unpublished here. Unique recipients are unpublished. Quote the dollar total and the award count together. Obligations are not outlays. The implied mean is about $175,004.19, a ratio of two packet facts.
Is this a Omaha-only HUD total?: No. $830,394,898.08 and 4,745 awards are statewide Nebraska place of performance. Omaha, Lincoln, and Bellevue share one NE stamp. This packet does not publish a city split. A regional cut would be a different extract. Original filings remain on the source sites.
Where is the live HUD–Nebraska table?: Department of Housing and Urban Development in Nebraska is the overlay. Nebraska federal spending and Department of Housing and Urban Development are the parents, not addends. All spending ties lists other pairs. Keep both sides of the join when citing $830,394,898.08. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays.

USAspending.gov aggregate of federal obligations by state and awarding agency. Obligations are not outlays.