Department of Housing and Urban Development obligations in Ohio 3rd District (OH-03)
Place-of-performance OH-03 crossed with Department of Housing and Urban Development (agency 086) yields $720,340,262.73 in USAspending.gov obligations on 1,388 awards. One thousand three hundred eighty-eight HUD-coded awards equal about eight percent of OH-03’s district obligation total, a thick housing file inside a nine-billion-dollar district base. That pair is Department of Housing and Urban Development and Ohio 3rd District (OH-03) — not Ohio’s entire federal inflow, not Department of Housing and Urban Development nationwide, and not cash already paid. The cell is 7.8% of this district’s published obligation total ($9,261,752,814.37). Implied average obligation is about $518,977.13 ($720,340,262.73 ÷ 1,388). Correlation is not causation.
Key figures
- HUD in Ohio 3rd District (OH-03): $720,340,262.73 across 1,388 USAspending awards.
- Implied mean about $518,977.13 per record; district share 7.8% of $9,261,752,814.37.
- Agency 086 × OH-03 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a named-recipient list.
- Cite USAspending.gov; quote Ohio 3rd District and Department of Housing and Urban Development if live tables moved.
- Ohio federal spending and All spending ties are parents and an index, not amounts to add into $720,340,262.73.
The Ohio 3rd District (OH-03) filter on HUD
Awarding agency 086 and congressional district OH-03 meet here. $720,340,262.73 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Department of Housing and Urban Development’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to Ohio 3rd District (OH-03), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split HUD programs or contract versus assistance instruments. 1,388 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. It is not a housing-unit census, a voucher caseload, or a named-grantee file.
Dividing $720,340,262.73 by 1,388 yields about $518,977.13 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical contract, grant, or benefit line. 1,388 awards is a thick HUD file. Volume pulls the implied mean down. Unique recipients remain unpublished. Do not treat OH-03’s 086 cell as a synonym for every HUD account nationwide. Open Ohio 3rd District for the district table without this agency filter, Department of Housing and Urban Development for agency 086 without the OH-03 filter, Ohio federal spending for every awarding agency in the Ohio extract, and All spending ties for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $720,340,262.73.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development awarding-agency rollup
USAspending labels awarding agency 086 as Department of Housing and Urban Development. That code produced $720,340,262.73 when crossed with Ohio 3rd District (OH-03) place of performance. The agency-wide 086 hub does not require OH-03 geography. The district hub does not require HUD. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 1,388 awards. The packet does not split HUD programs or contract versus assistance instruments.
Correlation is not causation: Ohio 3rd District (OH-03) did not “cause” $720,340,262.73 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 086 × OH-03 only. It is not a housing-unit census, a voucher caseload, or a named-grantee file. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.
Reading the OH-03 stamp
Ohio 3rd District (OH-03) on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list OH-03 while later work occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other Ohio districts belong on those ties even when the awarding agency is also 086. Ohio 3rd District (OH-03) is a numbered congressional place-of-performance code inside Ohio. Other Ohio districts are separate joins even when they reuse awarding-agency 086. Ohio 3rd District (OH-03) is a numbered place-of-performance geography inside Ohio. Other Ohio districts are not this join. The packet does not publish a city split.
Ohio federal spending shows how agency 086 sits beside other awarding agencies in the same state extract. $720,340,262.73 is one district-agency column, not the state table. This packet does not split Ohio 3rd District (OH-03) by county, city, or census tract. Awards that carry a different awarding-agency code stay on those other ties even if the work sounds related to Department of Housing and Urban Development. The district-wide obligation total published here is $9,261,752,814.37; $720,340,262.73 is the HUD slice of that denominator.
USAspending obligations on this pair
USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $720,340,262.73 is that kind of sum for Department of Housing and Urban Development inside OH-03 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. Assistance and contract awards can share the same awarding-agency rollup; this packet does not split them. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $720,340,262.73 as given.
Ohio’s own budget is a separate ledger. Mixing it with the 1,388-row HUD cell leaves USAspending.gov. Treat 1,388 as award records in the aggregate, not unique vendors. Do not annualize without a year field in the packet. Do not per-capita or per-recipient the dollar total; those denominators are unpublished. The implied mean ($518,977.13) is a concentration statistic, not a typical OH-03 HUD payment.
Citing $720,340,262.73 without dropping a join side
Cite USAspending.gov: Department of Housing and Urban Development (agency 086) obligated $720,340,262.73 on 1,388 awards coded to Ohio 3rd District (OH-03). Name Department of Housing and Urban Development and Ohio 3rd District (OH-03) together. Keep the obligation word. If Ohio 3rd District or Department of Housing and Urban Development has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not a housing-unit census, a voucher caseload, or a named-grantee file. 7.8% of $9,261,752,814.37 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score.
Row count versus dollar concentration
1,388 awards is a thick HUD file. Volume pulls the implied mean down. Unique recipients remain unpublished. A large row count makes a program split tempting; the packet still does not supply one. A small row count makes a named-facility story tempting; the packet still does not name facilities or contractors. The implied mean (about $518,977.13) and the district share (7.8% of $9,261,752,814.37) are ratios of packet facts. Prefer Ohio 3rd District and Department of Housing and Urban Development if the live tables moved.
Questions
- How much HUD spending is coded to Ohio 3rd District (OH-03)?
- USAspending.gov lists $720,340,262.73 in HUD (agency 086) obligations across 1,388 awards coded to Ohio 3rd District (OH-03). That pair is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Ohio’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 7.8% of the district’s published total ($9,261,752,814.37). Unique recipients are unpublished.
- Does $720,340,262.73 include every HUD program in OH-03?
- The packet publishes one awarding-agency rollup. The packet does not split HUD programs or contract versus assistance instruments. $720,340,262.73 is the combined obligation sum for agency 086 inside OH-03 coding. This page will not invent a program pie or name contractors. 1,388 remains an action count, not a program count.
- Is $720,340,262.73 cash already paid in Ohio 3rd District (OH-03)?
- No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $720,340,262.73 as checks already cleared in Ohio 3rd District (OH-03) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 1,388 awards. Prefer the live district and agency hubs if the tables moved.
- Why is the implied average $518,977.13 not a typical award?
- The average is $720,340,262.73 divided by 1,388 awards, about $518,977.13. Thick files pull the mean down; thin files pull it up. Neither case publishes a typical instrument. Modifications add rows. Recipients are unpublished. Use the ratio only as a concentration statistic.
USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to awarding agency. District 90/98 (multi/non-voting placeholders) are omitted. Obligations are not outlays.