How much has the Department of Housing and Urban Development obligated in South Carolina?

USAspending.gov records $1,972,075,341.90 across 29,803 awards with awarding agency 086 and a South Carolina tag. That is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a count of Housing Choice Vouchers, public-housing units, or unique tenants. Department of Housing and Urban Development in South Carolina is the live overlay for this pair. Keep both keys when quoting $1,972,075,341.90.

Is $1,972,075,341.90 a measure of Housing Choice Vouchers, public-housing units, or unique tenants?

No. The packet publishes $1,972,075,341.90 and 29,803 awards for agency 086 inside SC coding. Those other series are unpublished here. Unique recipients are unpublished. Quote the dollar total and the award count together. Obligations are not outlays.

Why does this HUD file have 29,803 awards?

That is the award-record count for 086 × SC. Combined with $1,972,075,341.90, the average is about $66,170. Modifications and repeat instruments add rows. 29,803 is not unique Housing Choice Vouchers, public-housing units, or unique tenants. Later ingests can revise the count. Prefer the overlay if the table moved.

Where is the live HUD–South Carolina table?

Department of Housing and Urban Development in South Carolina is the overlay. South Carolina federal spending and Department of Housing and Urban Development are the parents, not addends. All spending ties lists other pairs. Keep both sides of the join when citing $1,972,075,341.90. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays.

← All data ties

Department of Housing and Urban Development federal obligations in South Carolina

The Department of Housing and Urban Development shows $1,972,075,341.90 in USAspending.gov obligations coded to South Carolina, across 29,803 awards. The pair is HUD plus South Carolina, not a household census. Awarding-agency 086 and South Carolina (SC) are the pair. Twenty-nine thousand eight hundred three awards is the thickest HUD action file in this slice: many more rows than Indiana or Alaska HUD, still a record count rather than unique households. The implied mean is about $66,170 per award — a quotient of two packet facts, not a typical project. USAspending.gov is the source. Amounts are obligations, not outlays.

Key figures

HUD in South Carolina: $1,972,075,341.90 across 29,803 USAspending awards.
Implied mean about $66,170 per record — a packet quotient, not a typical project.
Agency 086 × SC is not a measure of Housing Choice Vouchers, public-housing units, or unique tenants.
Cite obligations from USAspending.gov, not outlays.
Charleston, Columbia, Greenville, and the rest of the counties share one SC place-of-performance tag.

A high-count HUD file on South Carolina

Department of Housing and Urban Development as awarding agency, South Carolina as place-of-performance: 29,803 records summing to $1,972,075,341.90. A Department of Housing and Urban Development award coded outside SC is out. An award in South Carolina from a different awarding agency is out even if the topic sounds related. South Carolina (SC) excludes North Carolina, Georgia, and the Atlantic as a USAspending state key. A Charlotte-coded award is NC even if a household later moves to the Upstate. PIH, CPD, FHA, and other HUD components are unpublished splits inside awarding agency 086.

Twenty-nine thousand eight hundred three awards is the thickest HUD action file in this slice: many more rows than Indiana or Alaska HUD, still a record count rather than unique households. Unique recipients are unpublished. Do not read 29,803 as 29,803 unique Housing Choice Vouchers, public-housing units, or unique tenants. The overlay Department of Housing and Urban Development in South Carolina is the both-keys table. South Carolina federal spending is the all-agency state hub. Department of Housing and Urban Development is the agency book without an SC filter. All spending ties lists other joins.

Charleston, Columbia, and Greenville are unpublished. Do not treat 29,803 as three metro wait-lists glued together. Correlation is not causation: South Carolina did not “cause” $1,972,075,341.90 by existing as a large or small place. Population and outcome scores are not packet facts. The join is 086 × SC only.

Award rows are not unique households

$1,972,075,341.90 does not measure Housing Choice Vouchers, public-housing units, or unique tenants. Those series are not USAspending fields on this aggregate. The cell sums award obligations with awarding-agency code 086 and an SC place-of-performance tag. PIH, CPD, FHA, and other HUD components are unpublished splits inside awarding agency 086.

Do not treat 29,803 awards as a census of Housing Choice Vouchers, public-housing units, or unique tenants. Parent hubs are supposed to be larger than this pair. If South Carolina federal spending or Department of Housing and Urban Development matched $1,972,075,341.90 and 29,803, the join would be pointless. Use the overlay when both keys must stay on. North Carolina and Georgia HUD joins are other pairs, not addends.

South Carolina statewide, not Charleston versus Upstate

Place of performance SC is a geography tag on the award, not a metro list and not a commuting zone. South Carolina (SC) excludes North Carolina, Georgia, and the Atlantic as a USAspending state key. A Charlotte-coded award is NC even if a household later moves to the Upstate. Recipient address can differ from that state tag. Charleston, Columbia, Greenville, and the rest of the counties share one SC stamp.

Charleston, Columbia, and Greenville are unpublished. Do not treat 29,803 as three metro wait-lists glued together. This packet does not split $1,972,075,341.90 by city, county, or named facility. 29,803 awards stay statewide. A county table would be a different extract.

Commitments, not rent already paid

Even a thick or thin file records obligations, not necessarily outlays. $1,972,075,341.90 can include amounts that pay on a later schedule. Citing it as cash already sent in South Carolina confuses two concepts. Deobligations and upward adjustments both move the total.

South Carolina’s own budget is a different ledger. Mixing it with the 29,803-award USAspending file leaves this series. No fiscal year is published in this packet, so this page does not invent one. Keep the obligation label on $1,972,075,341.90.

Citing the HUD–South Carolina join

Cite USAspending.gov: Department of Housing and Urban Development (agency 086) obligated $1,972,075,341.90 on 29,803 awards coded to South Carolina. Name both sides. Keep “obligations.” Do not relabel the total as Housing Choice Vouchers, public-housing units, or unique tenants.

Prefer Department of Housing and Urban Development in South Carolina if the overlay has refreshed after an ingest. South Carolina federal spending still includes every other awarding agency tagged to SC. Department of Housing and Urban Development is the 086 parent without the SC filter. All spending ties indexes other pairs. Do not add those parents into $1,972,075,341.90. A usable footnote names Department of Housing and Urban Development, South Carolina, $1,972,075,341.90, and 29,803. The compact headline $1.97 billion is that same dollar total rounded. It is not a second extract. The implied mean near $66,170 is $1,972,075,341.90 divided by 29,803. Means are not medians. USAspending.gov remains the originating system.

Questions

How much has the Department of Housing and Urban Development obligated in South Carolina?: USAspending.gov records $1,972,075,341.90 across 29,803 awards with awarding agency 086 and a South Carolina tag. That is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a count of Housing Choice Vouchers, public-housing units, or unique tenants. Department of Housing and Urban Development in South Carolina is the live overlay for this pair. Keep both keys when quoting $1,972,075,341.90.
Is $1,972,075,341.90 a measure of Housing Choice Vouchers, public-housing units, or unique tenants?: No. The packet publishes $1,972,075,341.90 and 29,803 awards for agency 086 inside SC coding. Those other series are unpublished here. Unique recipients are unpublished. Quote the dollar total and the award count together. Obligations are not outlays.
Why does this HUD file have 29,803 awards?: That is the award-record count for 086 × SC. Combined with $1,972,075,341.90, the average is about $66,170. Modifications and repeat instruments add rows. 29,803 is not unique Housing Choice Vouchers, public-housing units, or unique tenants. Later ingests can revise the count. Prefer the overlay if the table moved.
Where is the live HUD–South Carolina table?: Department of Housing and Urban Development in South Carolina is the overlay. South Carolina federal spending and Department of Housing and Urban Development are the parents, not addends. All spending ties lists other pairs. Keep both sides of the join when citing $1,972,075,341.90. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays.

USAspending.gov aggregate of federal obligations by state and awarding agency. Obligations are not outlays.