Department of Housing and Urban Development federal obligations in South Dakota

HUD 086 overlapping South Dakota

Department of Housing and Urban Development as awarding agency, South Dakota as place-of-performance: 5,773 records summing to $972,048,948.67. A Department of Housing and Urban Development award coded outside SD is out. An award in South Dakota from a different awarding agency is out even if the topic sounds related. South Dakota (SD) excludes North Dakota, Minnesota, Iowa, Nebraska, Wyoming, and Montana. A Sioux Falls-coded award with a Minnesota place-of-performance tag is a different cell.

5,773 awards against $972,048,948.67 is a 5,773-award housing file, similar in row count to Iowa’s HUD join. Unique recipients are unpublished. Do not read 5773 as 5773 unique housing units, named properties, or voucher households. Department of Housing and Urban Development in South Dakota is the both-keys table. South Dakota federal spending is the all-agency state hub. Department of Housing and Urban Development is the agency book without an SD filter. All spending ties lists other joins.

Tribal and rural housing folklore is not a packet field. Unique properties are unpublished. Do not invent them. Correlation is not causation: South Dakota did not cause $972,048,948.67 by existing as a large or small place. Population and outcome scores are not packet facts. The join is 086 × SD only.

A thick HUD file is not a unit list

$972,048,948.67 does not measure housing units, named properties, or voucher households. Those series are not USAspending fields on this aggregate. The cell sums award obligations with awarding-agency code 086 and an SD place-of-performance tag.

Do not treat 5773 awards as a census of housing units, named properties, or voucher households. Parent hubs are supposed to be larger than this pair. If South Dakota federal spending or Department of Housing and Urban Development matched $972,048,948.67 and 5773, the join would be pointless. Use the overlay when both keys must stay on. Neighboring-state HUD joins are other pairs, not addends.

South Dakota, not an I-29-only map

Place of performance SD is a geography tag on the award, not a metro list and not a commuting zone. South Dakota (SD) excludes North Dakota, Minnesota, Iowa, Nebraska, Wyoming, and Montana. A Sioux Falls-coded award with a Minnesota place-of-performance tag is a different cell. Recipient address can differ from that state tag.

This packet does not split $972,048,948.67 by city, county, or named facility. 5773 awards stay statewide. A county table would be a different extract. Campaign-finance filings do not fund these USAspending obligations.

Five thousand seven hundred seventy-three obligations

Even a thick or thin file records obligations, not necessarily outlays. $972,048,948.67 can include amounts that pay on a later schedule. Citing it as cash already sent in South Dakota confuses two concepts. Deobligations and upward adjustments both move the total.

South Dakota’s own budget is a different ledger. Mixing it with the 5,773 awards USAspending file leaves this series. No fiscal year is published in this packet, so this page does not invent one. Keep the obligation label on $972,048,948.67. Sharing a geography with Department of Housing and Urban Development does not mean FEC donations funded these awards.

Citing HUD in South Dakota

Cite USAspending.gov: Department of Housing and Urban Development (agency 086) obligated $972,048,948.67 on 5,773 awards coded to South Dakota. Name both sides. Keep “obligations.” Do not relabel the total as housing units, named properties, or voucher households.

Prefer Department of Housing and Urban Development in South Dakota if the overlay has refreshed after an ingest. South Dakota federal spending still includes every other awarding agency tagged to SD. Department of Housing and Urban Development is the 086 parent without the SD filter. All spending ties indexes other pairs. Do not add those parents into $972,048,948.67.

A usable footnote names Department of Housing and Urban Development, South Dakota, $972,048,948.67, and 5773. The compact headline $972.0M is that same dollar total rounded. It is not a second extract. The implied mean near $168,378.48 is $972,048,948.67 divided by 5773. Means are not medians. USAspending.gov remains the originating system.

A Plains HUD file is not a tribal housing census

South Dakota’s HUD overlay is 5773 awards totaling $972,048,948.67. Tribal and rural housing folklore are unpublished. Iowa’s HUD join in this slice has a similar row count on a different state tag. Unique properties are unpublished. Do not invent them.

Questions

How much has Department of Housing and Urban Development obligated in South Dakota?

USAspending.gov records $972,048,948.67 across 5,773 awards with awarding agency 086 and a South Dakota tag. That is an obligation join, not an outlay and not South Dakota’s full federal book. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Do 5,773 HUD awards mean 5,773 South Dakota housing units?

No. $972,048,948.67 is an obligation sum on awarding-agency 086 × SD. It does not measure housing units, named properties, or voucher households. Those series are not fields on this aggregate. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. The join is a catalog intersection, not a budget.

Why does this HUD file have 5773 awards?

5773 is an award-record count, including possible continuations and modifications. Dividing $972,048,948.67 by 5773 yields about $168,378.48 as a mean, not a typical project. Unique recipients are unpublished. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Where is the live table for Department of Housing and Urban Development in South Dakota?

Department of Housing and Urban Development in South Dakota is the overlay for both keys. South Dakota federal spending is the all-agency South Dakota hub. Department of Housing and Urban Development is the agency parent. All spending ties indexes other spending ties. Prefer the overlay when both filters must stay on.