Department of Housing and Urban Development federal obligations in Utah
The Department of Housing and Urban Development shows $961,042,700.76 in USAspending.gov obligations coded to Utah, across 22,962 awards. Awarding-agency 086 and Utah (UT) are the pair. Twenty-two thousand nine hundred sixty-two awards is a high-count HUD file. Recurring instruments can thicken a list without each row being a new housing units. The implied mean is about $41,853.61 per award — a quotient of two packet facts, not a typical project. USAspending.gov is the source. Amounts are obligations, not outlays.
Key figures
- HUD in Utah: $961,042,700.76 across 22,962 USAspending awards.
- Implied mean about $41,853.61 per record — a packet quotient, not a typical project.
- Agency 086 × UT is not a measure of housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households.
- Cite obligations from USAspending.gov, not outlays.
- Utah federal spending and Department of Housing and Urban Development are parents, not amounts to add into $961,042,700.76.
HUD awards tagged to Utah
Department of Housing and Urban Development as awarding agency, Utah as place-of-performance: 22,962 records summing to $961,042,700.76. A Department of Housing and Urban Development award coded outside UT is out. An award in Utah from a different awarding agency is out even if the topic sounds related. Utah (UT) excludes Idaho, Nevada, Arizona, Colorado, and Wyoming. A St. George-adjacent Nevada-coded award is Nevada even if the I-15 story sounds similar.
Twenty-two thousand nine hundred sixty-two awards is a high-count HUD file. Recurring instruments can thicken a list without each row being a new housing units. Unique recipients are unpublished. Do not read 22,962 as 22,962 unique housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households. The overlay Department of Housing and Urban Development in Utah is the both-keys table. Utah federal spending is the all-agency state hub. Department of Housing and Urban Development is the agency book without an UT filter. All spending ties lists other joins.
Salt Lake City, Provo, and Ogden share one UT stamp. PIH, CPD, and other HUD components can share awarding-agency 086 without a published bureau pie. Correlation is not causation: Utah did not cause $961,042,700.76 by existing as a large or small place. Population and outcome scores are not packet facts. The join is 086 × UT only.
22,962 rows are not 22,962 units
$961,042,700.76 does not measure housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households. Those series are not USAspending fields on this aggregate. The cell sums award obligations with awarding-agency code 086 and an UT place-of-performance tag.
Do not treat 22,962 awards as a census of housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households. Parent hubs are supposed to be larger than this pair. If Utah federal spending or Department of Housing and Urban Development matched $961,042,700.76 and 22,962, the join would be pointless. Use the overlay when both keys must stay on. Neighbor-state HUD joins are other pairs, not addends. Dividing $961,042,700.76 by 22,962 yields about $41,853.61 per award on average. That average hides contracts, grants, and other instruments. It is not a typical HUD line and not a published median.
Utah, not an Intermountain HUD rollup
Place of performance UT is a geography tag on the award, not a metro list and not a commuting zone. Utah (UT) excludes Idaho, Nevada, Arizona, Colorado, and Wyoming. A St. George-adjacent Nevada-coded award is Nevada even if the I-15 story sounds similar. Recipient address can differ from that state tag.
Salt Lake City, Provo, and Ogden share one UT stamp. This packet does not split $961,042,700.76 by city, county, or named facility. 22,962 awards stay statewide. A county table would be a different extract.
A thick HUD file, still obligations
Even a thick file records obligations, not necessarily outlays. $961,042,700.76 can include amounts that pay on a later schedule. Citing it as cash already sent in Utah confuses two concepts. Deobligations and upward adjustments both move the total.
Utah's own budget is a different ledger. Mixing it with the 22,962-award USAspending file leaves this series. No fiscal year is published in this packet, so this page does not invent one. Keep the obligation label on $961,042,700.76.
What this pair does not prove
A large HUD total in Utah does not mean the agency caused Utah's fiscal mix, and it does not connect these obligations to campaign contributions. Keep $961,042,700.76 labeled as agency 086 obligations with Utah place of performance. Neighbor HUD cells among Idaho, Nevada, Arizona, Colorado, and Wyoming are separate joins. This page does not rank Utah as a winner or loser.
Recipient names are unpublished in this packet. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to explain $961,042,700.76. Place-of-performance UT can differ from a vendor mailroom. A St. George-adjacent Nevada-coded award is Nevada even if the I-15 story sounds similar. A later ingest can restate $961,042,700.76 and 22,962 without changing the join definition: awarding agency 086 crossed with Utah.
Citing HUD in Utah
Cite USAspending.gov: Department of Housing and Urban Development (agency 086) obligated $961,042,700.76 on 22,962 awards coded to Utah. Name both sides. Keep “obligations.” Do not relabel the total as housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households.
Prefer Department of Housing and Urban Development in Utah if the overlay has refreshed after an ingest. Utah federal spending still includes every other awarding agency tagged to UT. Department of Housing and Urban Development is the 086 parent without the UT filter. All spending ties indexes other pairs. Do not add those parents into $961,042,700.76.
A usable footnote names Department of Housing and Urban Development, Utah, $961,042,700.76, and 22,962. The implied mean near $41,853.61 is $961,042,700.76 divided by 22,962. Means are not medians. USAspending.gov remains the originating system. FEC individual contributions are a different dataset; they do not fund this USAspending cell. Correlation is not causation.
Questions
- How much has the Department of Housing and Urban Development obligated in Utah?
- USAspending.gov records $961,042,700.76 across 22,962 awards with awarding agency 086 and a Utah tag. That is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a count of housing units, unique PHAs, or voucher households. Department of Housing and Urban Development in Utah is the live overlay for this pair. Keep both keys when quoting $961,042,700.76.
- Is $961,042,700.76 a measure of housing units?
- No. The packet publishes $961,042,700.76 and 22,962 awards for agency 086 inside UT coding. Those other series are unpublished here. Unique recipients are unpublished. Quote the dollar total and the award count together. Obligations are not outlays. The implied mean is about $41,853.61, a ratio of two packet facts.
- Is this a Salt Lake City-only HUD total?
- No. $961,042,700.76 and 22,962 awards are statewide Utah place of performance. Salt Lake City, Provo, and Ogden share one UT stamp. This packet does not publish a city split. A regional cut would be a different extract. Original filings remain on the source sites.
- Where is the live HUD–Utah table?
- Department of Housing and Urban Development in Utah is the overlay. Utah federal spending and Department of Housing and Urban Development are the parents, not addends. All spending ties lists other pairs. Keep both sides of the join when citing $961,042,700.76. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays.
USAspending.gov aggregate of federal obligations by state and awarding agency. Obligations are not outlays.