How much Labor spending is coded to California 52nd District (CA-52)?

USAspending.gov lists $110,426,363.56 in Labor (agency 1601) obligations across 2 awards coded to California 52nd District (CA-52). That pair is an obligation join, not an outlay and not California’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 0.7% of the district’s published total ($15,857,519,241.51). Unique recipients are unpublished.

Does this include every Department of Labor program in CA-52?

The packet publishes one awarding-agency rollup for agency 1601. It does not split DOL components or contract versus assistance. $110,426,363.56 is the combined obligation sum inside CA-52 coding. This page will not invent a program pie or name contractors. 2 remains an action count, not a program count.

Is $110,426,363.56 cash already paid in California 52nd District (CA-52)?

No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $110,426,363.56 as checks already cleared in California 52nd District (CA-52) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 2 awards. Prefer the live district and agency hubs if the tables moved.

Is California 52nd District (CA-52) ranked against other California districts here?

No. This page does not rank California 52nd District (CA-52) as a winner or loser. $110,426,363.56 and 2 describe one join. Neighboring districts have their own cells. District 90/98 placeholders are omitted. Cite Department of Labor and California 52nd District (CA-52) together without a league table.

← All data ties

Department of Labor obligations in California 52nd District (CA-52)

USAspending.gov tags $110,426,363.56 to Department of Labor inside California 52nd District (CA-52) — 2 award records, not outlays. Two Labor-coded awards make a thin slice of the district denominator (0.7% of $15,857,519,241.51). The pair is Department of Labor and California 52nd District (CA-52) only. It is not California statewide spending and not Department of Labor without a geography filter. Implied average is about $55,213,181.78. Correlation is not causation.

Key figures

Labor in California 52nd District (CA-52): $110,426,363.56 across 2 USAspending awards.
Implied mean about $55,213,181.78 per record; district share 0.7% of $15,857,519,241.51.
Agency 1601 × CA-52 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a named-recipient list.
Cite USAspending.gov; quote California 52nd District and Department of Labor if live tables moved.
California federal spending and All spending ties are a parent and an index, not amounts to add into $110,426,363.56.

Department of Labor obligations coded to California 52nd District (CA-52)

Awarding agency 1601 and congressional district CA-52 meet here. $110,426,363.56 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Department of Labor’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to California 52nd District (CA-52), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split Employment and Training Administration, OSHA, or other Labor components, and it does not split contract versus assistance instruments. 2 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. This cell is not a job-placement census, an unemployment-check register, or a named-grantee file.

Dividing $110,426,363.56 by 2 yields about $55,213,181.78 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical training grant, wage-hour penalty, or weekly UI line. Two awards is a thin award file. Do not treat CA-52’s 1601 cell as a synonym for every Labor account nationwide. Open California 52nd District for the district table without this agency filter, Department of Labor for agency 1601 without the CA-52 filter, California federal spending for every awarding agency in the California extract, and All spending ties for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $110,426,363.56.

What Labor contributes to this pair

USAspending labels awarding agency 1601 as Department of Labor. That code produced $110,426,363.56 when crossed with California 52nd District (CA-52) place of performance. The agency-wide 1601 hub does not require CA-52 geography. The district hub does not require Labor. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 2 awards. The packet does not split Employment and Training Administration, OSHA, or other Labor components, and it does not split contract versus assistance instruments.

District geography versus California statewide totals

California 52nd District (CA-52) on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list CA-52 while later work occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other California districts belong on those ties even when the awarding agency is also 1601. California 52nd District (CA-52) is a numbered congressional place-of-performance code inside California. Other California districts are separate joins even when they reuse awarding-agency 1601.

California federal spending shows how agency 1601 sits beside other awarding agencies in the same state extract. $110,426,363.56 is one district-agency column, not the state table. This packet does not split California 52nd District (CA-52) by county, city, or census tract. Awards that carry a different awarding-agency code stay on those other ties even if the work sounds related to Department of Labor. The district-wide obligation total published here is $15,857,519,241.51; $110,426,363.56 is the Labor slice of that denominator.

Why this is not an outlay register

USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $110,426,363.56 is that kind of sum for Department of Labor inside CA-52 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. Assistance and contract awards can share the same awarding-agency rollup; this packet does not split them. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $110,426,363.56 as given.

Live tables versus this snapshot

Cite USAspending.gov: Department of Labor (agency 1601) obligated $110,426,363.56 on 2 awards coded to California 52nd District (CA-52). Name Department of Labor and California 52nd District (CA-52) together. Keep the obligation word. If California 52nd District or Department of Labor has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not a job-placement census, an unemployment-check register, or a named-grantee file. 0.7% of $15,857,519,241.51 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score.

Keep Department of Labor, California 52nd District (CA-52), $110,426,363.56, and 2 awards together. All spending ties indexes other pairs. Department of Labor is the 1601 parent without a CA-52 filter. California federal spending is the California parent. Do not add those parents to this cell. Sharing a district with Labor does not mean campaign donations funded these awards, and it does not convert obligations into outlays. This page reports one USAspending join.

Using 0.7% and $55,213,181.78 without overclaiming

Do not rank California 52nd District (CA-52) as more Labor-dependent than neighboring districts on the strength of this cell alone. Neighboring geographies have their own 1601 ties with different dollar totals, or no published 1601 cell in this harvest. This snapshot holds $110,426,363.56 and 2 only. All spending ties is the index, not an addend. Obligations are not outlays. Correlation is not causation. Workforce outcomes, claimant counts, and inspection caseloads are unpublished here.

Questions

How much Labor spending is coded to California 52nd District (CA-52)?: USAspending.gov lists $110,426,363.56 in Labor (agency 1601) obligations across 2 awards coded to California 52nd District (CA-52). That pair is an obligation join, not an outlay and not California’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 0.7% of the district’s published total ($15,857,519,241.51). Unique recipients are unpublished.
Does this include every Department of Labor program in CA-52?: The packet publishes one awarding-agency rollup for agency 1601. It does not split DOL components or contract versus assistance. $110,426,363.56 is the combined obligation sum inside CA-52 coding. This page will not invent a program pie or name contractors. 2 remains an action count, not a program count.
Is $110,426,363.56 cash already paid in California 52nd District (CA-52)?: No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $110,426,363.56 as checks already cleared in California 52nd District (CA-52) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 2 awards. Prefer the live district and agency hubs if the tables moved.
Is California 52nd District (CA-52) ranked against other California districts here?: No. This page does not rank California 52nd District (CA-52) as a winner or loser. $110,426,363.56 and 2 describe one join. Neighboring districts have their own cells. District 90/98 placeholders are omitted. Cite Department of Labor and California 52nd District (CA-52) together without a league table.

USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to awarding agency. District 90/98 (multi/non-voting placeholders) are omitted. Obligations are not outlays.