Skip to main content
← All data ties

Department of Labor federal obligations in New Hampshire

Awarding agency Department of Labor (code 1601) lists $281,153,626.01 in New Hampshire place-of-performance obligations. 118 actions sit behind that total on USAspending.gov. This page is a JOIN: drop either side and the number is no longer $281,153,626.01.

Key figures

  • USAspending cell: DOL × New Hampshire = $281,153,626.01.
  • 118 records, about $2,382,657.85 each as a mean.
  • Outlays and fiscal-year splits are unpublished here.
  • Agency 1601 is the awarding-agency key on this overlay.
  • No contractor names in this packet; geography is statewide New Hampshire.

The 1601 overlay inside New Hampshire

A state-agency tie exists because two tables meet. Here the tables are Department of Labor (code 1601) and New Hampshire (NH). $281,153,626.01 is what remains after both filters. Workforce, unemployment-insurance, and wage-hour folklore can explain a search query; it cannot rewrite the cell.

118 rows produced $281,153,626.01. The mean of about $2,382,657.85 follows from division. High means often mark a few large instruments; low means often mark many small rows. This packet publishes neither a breakdown by award type nor a list of unique workforce offices or grantees.

Open Department of Labor in New Hampshire for the filtered table, New Hampshire federal spending for the next hub, Department of Labor for the remaining hub, and All spending ties for other pairs.

The mean on a DOL–New Hampshire overlay

$281,153,626.01 divided by 118 equals about $2,382,657.85. That sentence uses every numeric fact the packet allows for a per-award figure. It does not authorize a contractor roster, a CFDA list, or a fiscal-year split.

Do not subtract $281,153,626.01 from a remembered national DOL total and call the difference 'New Hampshire versus everywhere else.' This packet has no national total.

Place of performance is statewide New Hampshire

Place-of-performance New Hampshire is statewide; it does not split Concord, Manchester, and Nashua. Neighbor-coded activity in Maine, Massachusetts, or Vermont stays out even if mail is handled in Manchester.

Manchester can appear in search queries without appearing as a dollar field. Keep $281,153,626.01 attached to New Hampshire, not to a single city.

Payments and recoveries live elsewhere

Outlays, recoveries, and cancellations are different concepts. None of them is a packet fact here. The published unit for $281,153,626.01 is obligations.

A modification that reduces an earlier obligation still counts as an award action in many extracts. That is another reason 118 is not unique workforce offices or grantees.

Correlation is not causation on a state-agency tie

This page is not a ranking of states and not a ranking of agencies. $281,153,626.01 is a cell value. Neighbor cells are other files. They are not winners or losers.

The voice constraint is neutral. This file does not call the spending wasteful or essential. It reports $281,153,626.01 and 118 and the two keys that produced them. Do not claim that donations paid for $281,153,626.01 in New Hampshire. Keep FEC language off captions that reuse that dollar figure.

What to reuse and what to leave out

The overlay, the statewide hub, the agency hub, and the ties index are the four hrefs this packet allows. They are Department of Labor in New Hampshire, New Hampshire federal spending, Department of Labor, and All spending ties.

All spending ties is an index of joins, not a hidden total that already includes $281,153,626.01. Department of Labor in New Hampshire remains the place to verify the live rows. Place-of-performance New Hampshire is statewide; it does not split Concord, Manchester, and Nashua. Neighbor-coded activity in Maine, Massachusetts, or Vermont stays out even if mail is handled in Manchester. Correlation is not causation. Workforce, unemployment-insurance, and wage-hour folklore can be a legitimate research question on another page. Here it is labeled folklore because the packet has no NAICS, CFDA, or program column. Merrimack, seacoast, and north-country folklore is the same kind of reader path: useful for search, unused as math. Agency 1601 on a different state's overlay is a sibling join, not a remainder that must add to a national DOL budget on this page. New Hampshire's $281,153,626.01 cell stands alone. Do not subtract it from Department of Labor and call the difference 'New Hampshire versus everywhere else' without a published national total in this packet — there is none. Department of Labor is the awarding-agency label stored on the New Hampshire overlay; the numeric key is 1601. Readers who only remember the short name DOL still need both the state tag and the agency tag before quoting $281,153,626.01. The 118 figure is not a count of unique workforce offices or grantees and is not a count of distinct DOL programs. Modifications can add rows without adding new vendors. That is another reason the mean of about $2,382,657.85 is not a typical workforce or wage-hour award. Agency 1601 is the awarding-agency key on this overlay. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. This file copies overlayTarget /states/nh/agencies/1601/ and canonicalPath /ties/department-of-labor-in-new-hampshire/ from the packet. It does not add a fiscal year, a contractor, or an FEC dollar. If the live overlay later disagrees with $281,153,626.01 or 118, trust the table and treat this prose as dated to the extract. Until then, the reusable facts are $281,153,626.01, 118 awards, agency 1601, Department of Labor, New Hampshire (NH), and the obligation unit.

Questions

What is the DOL obligation total for New Hampshire?
USAspending.gov records $281,153,626.01 in obligations for awarding agency 1601 (Department of Labor) with New Hampshire place of performance, covering 118 awards. That is an obligation total, not an outlay total, and not Department of Labor's nationwide budget. The pair is a join, not a ranking.
Are unique Labor grantees listed for New Hampshire?
The extract lists 118 award actions totaling $281,153,626.01. Average obligation per award is about $2,382,657.85, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical workforce or wage-hour award. Unique workforce offices or grantees are not published here. Original filings remain on the source sites.
Are Massachusetts or Vermont Labor awards included?
No. $281,153,626.01 and 118 awards are statewide New Hampshire place of performance. This packet does not split Concord, Manchester, and Nashua. Awards coded to Maine, Massachusetts, or Vermont are outside this cell even if mail is handled in Manchester. The geography key remains NH.
Which page filters Labor agency 1601 to New Hampshire?
Department of Labor in New Hampshire is the overlay. New Hampshire federal spending shows all agencies in the state. Department of Labor shows agency 1601 without a state filter. All spending ties lists other pairs. Original filings remain on the source sites.

USAspending.gov aggregate of federal obligations by state and awarding agency. Obligations are not outlays.