Department of Labor federal obligations in Oregon
USAspending.gov records $1,162,996,317.21 in Department of Labor obligations coded to agency 1601 with Oregon place of performance, across 182 awards. That is a high dollar total on a relatively short row list. Average obligation per award is about $6,390,089.66 — a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical workforce grant.
Key figures
- Labor (1601) in Oregon: $1,162,996,317.21 across 182 awards.
- Average obligation per award is about $6,390,089.66.
- The total is obligations, not outlays, and not nationwide Labor.
- OR is place of performance, not a Portland-only split.
What the Labor-Oregon join is
Awarding agency 1601 and place-of-performance state OR meet here. $1,162,996,317.21 is the obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Department of Labor's nationwide budget, not Oregon's entire federal inflow, and not cash already paid. Workforce-board, timber, and statewide job-training folklore may send a reader here. Those stories are not packet NAICS and not a census of Oregon workers.
182 award actions sit behind that dollar figure — a short award list beside a billion-dollar obligation total. A few large awards can dominate a dollar total even when the row count looks modest. The join does not rank Oregon against other states and does not name training boards inside the extract.
Open Department of Labor in Oregon for the filtered table, Oregon federal spending for the next hub, Department of Labor for the remaining hub, and All spending ties for other pairs.
182 Labor actions under one Oregon filter
Dividing $1,162,996,317.21 by 182 yields about $6,390,089.66 per award on average. That average hides contracts, grants, and other instruments. It is not a typical workforce grant. Repeat awards and modifications still add rows; the listed count is not a unique-recipient census. Board names belong on the overlay if they appear as recipients; they are not extra packet dollars.
Workforce-board, timber, and statewide job-training folklore is a coding conversation, not a packet field. Agency names and recipient rows live on the overlay table, not in this narrative's extra columns.
Agency 1601 without an Oregon overlay is a different total
The agency-wide Department of Labor page aggregates 1601 without requiring OR geography. The Oregon federal spending page aggregates all agencies with Oregon place of performance. Only Department of Labor in Oregon applies both filters, which is why this tie cites 182 awards and $1,162,996,317.21.
Place of performance in Oregon is a USAspending geography field. Awards can list OR while later work occurs in Washington or California. Labor awards coded to those states do not sit in this total even if a vendor's mailroom is in Portland. This packet does not split Portland from Eugene or Medford.
Obligations, not outlays
An obligation is a legal commitment. An outlay is a payment. $1,162,996,317.21 is the former. This packet has no outlay total, no fiscal-year split, and no de-obligation history. Citing the figure as money already spent in Oregon over-reads the field.
Award count 182 is a record count, not a payment count. Readers who need transaction-level detail should use the Oregon-Labor overlay. All spending ties does not hide a blended statewide total under this slug.
What this pair does not prove
A large Labor total in Oregon does not mean the agency caused Oregon's employment mix, and it does not connect these obligations to campaign contributions. Correlation between industrial geography and Labor awards is expected; it is not a finding about wages or waste.
Keep $1,162,996,317.21 labeled as agency 1601 obligations with Oregon place of performance. FEC individual contributions are a different dataset. An agency name that appears near a donor occupation is a coincidence of labeling, not a cash pipeline into USAspending.
How to cite the Oregon-Labor pair
A clean footnote names awarding agency 1601 (Department of Labor), Oregon place of performance, $1,162,996,317.21 in obligations, and 182 awards on USAspending.gov. Keep the obligation word. Do not call $1,162,996,317.21 cash outlays. Mean dollars per action remain about $6,390,089.66 if you divide those two facts — a ratio, not a typical workforce grant.
Department of Labor in Oregon, Oregon federal spending, Department of Labor, and All spending ties keep the same unit. A later ingest can restate $1,162,996,317.21 without changing the join definition. Rewrite only the sentence whose source moved. Portland-versus-Eugene folklore is not a metro split in this packet. A short award list is still a record count, including modifications. Unique recipients are not published here. Keep the obligation label in every reuse. Correlation is not causation.
Questions
- How much has the Labor Department obligated in Oregon?
- USAspending.gov records $1,162,996,317.21 in obligations for awarding agency 1601 with Oregon place of performance, covering 182 awards. That is an obligation total, not an outlay total, and not Department of Labor's nationwide budget. Original filings remain on the source sites.
- Why are there so few Labor awards in Oregon relative to the dollars?
- The extract lists 182 award actions totaling $1,162,996,317.21. Average obligation per award is about $6,390,089.66, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical workforce grant. Unique recipients are not published here. Original filings remain on the source sites.
- Is this a Portland-only Labor total?
- No. $1,162,996,317.21 and 182 awards are statewide Oregon place of performance. This packet does not split Portland from Eugene or Medford. A regional cut would be a different extract. Original filings remain on the source sites.
- Where is the live Labor-Oregon table?
- Department of Labor in Oregon is the overlay. Oregon federal spending shows all agencies in the state. Department of Labor shows agency 1601 without a state filter. All spending ties lists other pairs. Original filings remain on the source sites.
USAspending.gov aggregate of federal obligations by state and awarding agency. Obligations are not outlays.