Department of Labor federal obligations in Vermont

Department 1601 overlapping Vermont

Department of Labor as awarding agency, Vermont as place-of-performance: 110 records summing to $251,734,562.92. A Department of Labor award coded outside VT is out. An award in Vermont from a different awarding agency is out even if the topic sounds related. Vermont (VT) excludes New York, New Hampshire, and Massachusetts. A Burlington-coded award with a New York place-of-performance tag is a different cell.

110 awards against $251,734,562.92 is a 110-award labor file, mid-size in records against a $251.7 million cell. Unique recipients are unpublished. Do not read 110 as 110 unique unemployment-claim volumes, named training sites, or wage-survey rows. Department of Labor in Vermont is the both-keys table. Vermont federal spending is the all-agency state hub. Department of Labor is the agency book without an VT filter. All spending ties lists other joins.

Unemployment-claim volumes, named training sites, and wage-survey rows stay unpublished. Idaho’s DOL overlay is a different pair. Correlation is not causation: Vermont did not cause $251,734,562.92 by existing as a large or small place. Population and outcome scores are not packet facts. The join is 1601 × VT only.

DOL is not a wage-survey census

$251,734,562.92 does not measure unemployment-claim volumes, named training sites, or wage-survey rows. Those series are not USAspending fields on this aggregate. The cell sums award obligations with awarding-agency code 1601 and an VT place-of-performance tag.

Do not treat 110 awards as a census of unemployment-claim volumes, named training sites, or wage-survey rows. Parent hubs are supposed to be larger than this pair. If Vermont federal spending or Department of Labor matched $251,734,562.92 and 110, the join would be pointless. Use the overlay when both keys must stay on. Neighboring-state DOL joins are other pairs, not addends.

Vermont, not a Burlington-only tag

Place of performance VT is a geography tag on the award, not a metro list and not a commuting zone. Vermont (VT) excludes New York, New Hampshire, and Massachusetts. A Brattleboro-coded award with a New Hampshire place-of-performance tag is a different cell. Recipient address can differ from that state tag.

This packet does not split $251,734,562.92 by city, county, or named facility. 110 awards stay statewide. A county table would be a different extract. Campaign-finance filings do not fund these USAspending obligations.

One hundred ten obligations

Even a thick or thin file records obligations, not necessarily outlays. $251,734,562.92 can include amounts that pay on a later schedule. Citing it as cash already sent in Vermont confuses two concepts. Deobligations and upward adjustments both move the total.

Vermont’s own budget is a different ledger. Mixing it with the 110 awards USAspending file leaves this series. No fiscal year is published in this packet, so this page does not invent one. Keep the obligation label on $251,734,562.92. Sharing a geography with Department of Labor does not mean FEC donations funded these awards.

Citing Department of Labor in Vermont

Cite USAspending.gov: Department of Labor (agency 1601) obligated $251,734,562.92 on 110 awards coded to Vermont. Name both sides. Keep “obligations.” Do not relabel the total as unemployment-claim volumes, named training sites, or wage-survey rows.

Prefer Department of Labor in Vermont if the overlay has refreshed after an ingest. Vermont federal spending still includes every other awarding agency tagged to VT. Department of Labor is the 1601 parent without the VT filter. All spending ties indexes other pairs. Do not add those parents into $251,734,562.92.

A usable footnote names Department of Labor, Vermont, $251,734,562.92, and 110. The compact headline $251.7M is that same dollar total rounded. It is not a second extract. The implied mean near $2,288,496.03 is $251,734,562.92 divided by 110. Means are not medians. USAspending.gov remains the originating system.

Labor dollars without a training-site roster

Vermont’s DOL overlay is 110 awards totaling $251,734,562.92. Unemployment-claim volumes, named training sites, and wage-survey rows stay unpublished. Idaho’s DOL overlay is a different pair. Adding parent hubs into $251,734,562.92 would invent a combined Vermont total. Keep 1601 × VT as the pair. No fiscal year is published in this packet. Keep the obligation label on $251,734,562.92. Unique recipients stay unpublished. FEC filings are a different dataset.

Questions

How much has Department of Labor obligated in Vermont?

USAspending.gov records $251,734,562.92 across 110 awards with awarding agency 1601 and a Vermont tag. That is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Vermont’s full federal book. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. The join is a catalog intersection, not a budget.

Does $251.7 million count Vermont unemployment claims?

No. $251,734,562.92 is an obligation sum on awarding-agency 1601 × VT. It does not measure unemployment-claim volumes, named training sites, or wage-survey rows. Those series are not fields on this aggregate. The join is a catalog intersection, not an outcome score. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Why does this Vermont DOL file have 110 awards?

110 is an award-record count, including possible continuations and modifications. Dividing $251,734,562.92 by 110 yields about $2,288,496.03 as a mean, not a typical project and not a median. Unique recipients are unpublished. Do not invent contractor names. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Where is the live table for Department of Labor in Vermont?

Department of Labor in Vermont is the overlay for both keys. Vermont federal spending is the all-agency Vermont hub. Department of Labor is the agency parent. All spending ties indexes other spending ties. Prefer the overlay when both filters must stay on.