Skip to main content
← All data ties

Department of State in California 52nd District (CA-52)

$175,024,884.21 in Department of State obligations is coded to California 52nd District (CA-52) on USAspending.gov, across 22 awards. Cite awarding agency 019 and district CA-52 together. The join is not a consular ranking, a visa-wait scoreboard, or a named-vendor file. That slice is about 1.1% of the district-wide $15,857,519,241.51 obligation book in this extract.

Key figures

  • Department of State in California 52nd District (CA-52): $175,024,884.21 across 22 awards.
  • About 1.1% of the district's $15,857,519,241.51 all-agency obligation total.
  • Average obligation per award is about $7,955,676.56 (ratio only).
  • The join is Department of State × California 52nd District (CA-52) place of performance, not California statewide State totals or the California 28th State overlay.
  • Figures are USAspending obligations, not outlays.

State Department obligations coded to California 52nd (CA-52)

USAspending.gov stores this cell as agency 019 × CA-52. $175,024,884.21 is the obligation sum for Department of State with California 52nd District (CA-52) place of performance. It is not California's statewide Department of State total and not an outlay. Quote California 52nd District and Department of State as parents. Correlation is not causation.

22 is an award-action count. Modifications and delivery orders can add rows. Unique vendors are unpublished. Dividing $175,024,884.21 by 22 yields about $7,955,676.56 per award, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical invoice. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these obligations. 22 awards is a modest action file. Modifications and delivery orders can add rows without adding unique recipients.

Department of State as awarding agency 019

Agency 019 is Department of State. Twenty-two awards can include modifications. Unique vendors and posts are unpublished. California 28th is a different State join. Confusing this join with California statewide State totals or the California 28th State overlay would be a different overlay. Packet facts on the agency side are the name Department of State, code 019, and the join dollars $175,024,884.21. Any other recipient or installation list would be invented.

Department of State drops the district filter. Other districts with Department of State awards are other ties. This page quotes only California 52nd District (CA-52). Do not rank CA-52 against CA-28 as more diplomatic. Keep both sides of this join: Department of State and California 52nd District (CA-52). Campaign-finance tables do not fund USAspending.

California 52nd District (CA-52) as place of performance

California 52nd District (CA-52) is a congressional geography stamp, not a foreign-post map. Awards tagged to California 28th stay on that tie. Other California districts are other pairs. Place of performance CA-52 is a geography field in the award file. It does not prove residency of workers or vendors. California federal spending is the statewide parent and includes other districts.

The district's all-agency obligation total is $15,857,519,241.51. $175,024,884.21 is the Department of State slice of that book, about 1.1%. Remaining district dollars sit with other awarding agencies on California 52nd District, not inside this join. District 90/98 multi and non-voting placeholders are omitted from this harvest by design.

Twenty-two award rows versus the district-wide book

22 awards against $175,024,884.21 implies about $7,955,676.56 per award. That mean is not a unit price and not a jobs figure. With 22 rows, a few large instruments can dominate. Treat the count as records in an aggregate, not as 22 finished projects. All spending ties lists other pairs. Do not annualize without a year field in the packet. Do not per-capita or per-recipient the dollar total; those denominators are unpublished.

What the State × CA-52 pair cannot prove

An obligation is a legal commitment. $175,024,884.21 is that kind of sum for Department of State inside CA-52 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. This packet has no outlay total and no fiscal-year split. Citing the figure as cash already spent in California 52nd District (CA-52) over-reads the field. Do not rank California 52nd District (CA-52) as a winner or loser versus other districts. Keep both sides in the citation: Department of State and California 52nd District (CA-52).

Parent hubs around this State overlay

Open California 52nd District for the district rollup, Department of State for the agency rollup, California federal spending for California statewide spending, and All spending ties for other pairs. None of those links convert this cell into California statewide State totals or the California 28th State overlay, into outlays this packet omits, or into a contractor list. Cite Department of State in California 52nd District (CA-52), $175,024,884.21, 22 awards, USAspending.gov, obligations only. Do not rank CA-52 against CA-28 as more diplomatic. Keep both sides of this join: Department of State and California 52nd District (CA-52). Campaign-finance tables do not fund USAspending.

Questions

How much State Department spending is coded to California 52nd (CA-52)?
USAspending.gov records $175,024,884.21 in Department of State obligations with California 52nd District (CA-52) place of performance across 22 awards. That is an obligation aggregate for the district-agency pair, not an outlay and not California's complete federal ledger.
Does 22 awards mean 22 diplomatic posts or contractors?
No. 22 is an award-action count and can include modifications. Unique vendors are not published. Average obligation is about $7,955,676.56 per award, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical invoice. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
Is this California's entire Department of State total?
No. $175,024,884.21 is only the Department of State slice tagged to California 52nd District (CA-52). California federal spending is the statewide parent. California 52nd District includes other awarding agencies in the same district. Mixing those books into this total would overstate the join.
Where is the live State in California 52nd District table?
California 52nd District is the district parent. Department of State is the agency hub. California federal spending is the California parent. All spending ties lists other pairs. Prefer those tables after later ingests; this page quotes Department of State × CA-52 at $175,024,884.21.

USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to awarding agency. District 90/98 (multi/non-voting placeholders) are omitted. Obligations are not outlays.