Skip to main content
← All data ties

Department of State obligations in Florida 28th District (FL-28)

The State × FL-28 cell on USAspending.gov is $100,837,990.95 in obligations across 25 awards. Twenty-five State-coded awards equal a limited share of the district denominator — 4.6% of Florida 28th District (FL-28)’s published obligation total ($2,174,871,314.83). That pair is Department of State and Florida 28th District (FL-28) — not Florida’s entire federal inflow, not Department of State nationwide, and not cash already paid. Implied average obligation is about $4,033,519.64 ($100,837,990.95 ÷ 25). Correlation is not causation.

Key figures

  • State in Florida 28th District (FL-28): $100,837,990.95 across 25 USAspending awards.
  • Implied mean about $4,033,519.64 per record; district share 4.6% of $2,174,871,314.83.
  • Agency 019 × FL-28 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a named-recipient list.
  • Cite USAspending.gov; quote Florida 28th District and Department of State if live tables moved.
  • Florida federal spending and All spending ties are a parent and an index, not amounts to add into $100,837,990.95.

A place-of-performance join: State × FL-28

Awarding agency 019 and congressional district FL-28 meet here. $100,837,990.95 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Department of State’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to Florida 28th District (FL-28), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split diplomatic, assistance, or domestic-support instruments under State. 25 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. This cell is not an embassy roster, a passport-workload file, or a named-contractor list.

Dividing $100,837,990.95 by 25 yields about $4,033,519.64 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical diplomatic contract, training grant, or consular line. Twenty-five awards is a small award file. Do not treat FL-28’s 019 cell as a synonym for every State account nationwide. Open Florida 28th District for the district table without this agency filter, Department of State for agency 019 without the FL-28 filter, Florida federal spending for every awarding agency in the Florida extract, and All spending ties for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $100,837,990.95.

Department of State as awarding agency, not as a named-vendor list

USAspending labels awarding agency 019 as Department of State. That code produced $100,837,990.95 when crossed with Florida 28th District (FL-28) place of performance. The agency-wide 019 hub does not require FL-28 geography. The district hub does not require State. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 25 awards. The packet does not split diplomatic, assistance, or domestic-support instruments under State.

Correlation is not causation: Florida 28th District (FL-28) did not cause $100,837,990.95 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 019 × FL-28 only. This cell is not an embassy roster, a passport-workload file, or a named-contractor list. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.

Place of performance for Florida 28th District (FL-28)

Florida 28th District (FL-28) on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list FL-28 while later work occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other Florida districts belong on those ties even when the awarding agency is also 019. Florida 28th District (FL-28) is a numbered congressional place-of-performance code inside Florida. Other Florida districts are separate joins even when they reuse awarding-agency 019.

Obligation math for this join

USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $100,837,990.95 is that kind of sum for Department of State inside FL-28 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. Assistance and contract awards can share the same awarding-agency rollup; this packet does not split them. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $100,837,990.95 as given.

Florida’s own budget is a separate ledger. Mixing it with the 25-row State cell leaves USAspending.gov. Treat 25 as award records in the aggregate, not unique vendors. Do not annualize without a year field in the packet. Do not per-capita or per-recipient the dollar total; those denominators are unpublished. The implied mean ($4,033,519.64) is a concentration statistic, not a typical FL-28 State payment.

What a complete citation includes

Cite USAspending.gov: Department of State (agency 019) obligated $100,837,990.95 on 25 awards coded to Florida 28th District (FL-28). Name Department of State and Florida 28th District (FL-28) together. Keep the obligation word. If Florida 28th District or Department of State has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not an embassy roster, a passport-workload file, or a named-contractor list. 4.6% of $2,174,871,314.83 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score.

What this packet refuses to infer

Twenty-five awards is a small award file. Volume can hide a few large assistance lines; the packet does not identify them. Unique recipients are unpublished. A large row count makes a program split tempting; the packet still does not supply one. A small row count makes a named-facility story tempting; the packet still does not name facilities or contractors. The implied mean (about $4,033,519.64) and the district share (4.6% of $2,174,871,314.83) are ratios of packet facts. Prefer Florida 28th District and Department of State if the live tables moved.

Do not rank Florida 28th District (FL-28) as more State-dependent than neighboring districts on the strength of this cell alone. Neighboring geographies have their own 019 ties with different dollar totals, or no published 019 cell in this harvest. This snapshot holds $100,837,990.95 and 25 only. All spending ties is the index, not an addend. Obligations are not outlays. Correlation is not causation. Post counts, visa volumes, and named missions are unpublished here.

Questions

How much State spending is coded to Florida 28th District (FL-28)?
USAspending.gov lists $100,837,990.95 in State (agency 019) obligations across 25 awards coded to Florida 28th District (FL-28). That pair is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Florida’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 4.6% of the district’s published total ($2,174,871,314.83). Unique recipients are unpublished.
Does this include every Department of State program in FL-28?
The packet publishes one awarding-agency rollup for agency 019. It does not split State instruments or contract versus assistance. $100,837,990.95 is the combined obligation sum inside FL-28 coding. This page will not invent a program pie or name contractors. 25 remains an action count, not a program count.
Is $100,837,990.95 cash already paid in Florida 28th District (FL-28)?
No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $100,837,990.95 as checks already cleared in Florida 28th District (FL-28) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 25 awards. Prefer the live district and agency hubs if the tables moved.
Is Florida 28th District (FL-28) ranked against other Florida districts here?
No. This page does not rank Florida 28th District (FL-28) as a winner or loser. $100,837,990.95 and 25 describe one join. Neighboring districts have their own cells. District 90/98 placeholders are omitted. Cite Department of State and Florida 28th District (FL-28) together without a league table.

USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to awarding agency. District 90/98 (multi/non-voting placeholders) are omitted. Obligations are not outlays.