Skip to main content
← All data ties

Department of the Interior obligations in California 7th District (CA-07)

Place-of-performance CA-07 crossed with Department of the Interior (agency 014) yields $300,857,074.35 in USAspending.gov obligations on 371 awards. Three hundred seventy-one Interior-coded awards equal about two percent of CA-07’s district obligation total, a visible Department of the Interior column that is not California’s statewide Interior ledger. That pair is Department of the Interior and California 7th District (CA-07) — not California’s entire federal inflow, not Department of the Interior nationwide, and not cash already paid. The cell is 2.0% of this district’s published obligation total ($14,819,156,885.49). Implied average obligation is about $810,935.51 ($300,857,074.35 ÷ 371). Correlation is not causation.

Key figures

  • Interior in California 7th District (CA-07): $300,857,074.35 across 371 USAspending awards.
  • Implied mean about $810,935.51 per record; district share 2.0% of $14,819,156,885.49.
  • Agency 014 × CA-07 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a named-recipient list.
  • Cite USAspending.gov; quote California 7th District and Department of the Interior if live tables moved.
  • California federal spending and All spending ties are parents and an index, not amounts to add into $300,857,074.35.

The California 7th District (CA-07) filter on Interior

Awarding agency 014 and congressional district CA-07 meet here. $300,857,074.35 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Department of the Interior’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to California 7th District (CA-07), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split Interior bureaus or contract versus assistance instruments. 371 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. It is not a park census, a land-acreage inventory, or a named-contractor file.

Dividing $300,857,074.35 by 371 yields about $810,935.51 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical contract, grant, or benefit line. 371 awards is a mid-size Interior file. Treat the count as action records, not parks, acres, or unique vendors. Do not treat CA-07’s 014 cell as a synonym for every Interior account nationwide. Open California 7th District for the district table without this agency filter, Department of the Interior for agency 014 without the CA-07 filter, California federal spending for every awarding agency in the California extract, and All spending ties for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $300,857,074.35.

The Department of the Interior awarding-agency rollup

USAspending labels awarding agency 014 as Department of the Interior. That code produced $300,857,074.35 when crossed with California 7th District (CA-07) place of performance. The agency-wide 014 hub does not require CA-07 geography. The district hub does not require Interior. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 371 awards. The packet does not split Interior bureaus or contract versus assistance instruments.

Correlation is not causation: California 7th District (CA-07) did not “cause” $300,857,074.35 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 014 × CA-07 only. It is not a park census, a land-acreage inventory, or a named-contractor file. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.

Reading the CA-07 stamp

California 7th District (CA-07) on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list CA-07 while later work occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other California districts belong on those ties even when the awarding agency is also 014. California 7th District (CA-07) is a numbered congressional place-of-performance code inside California. Other California districts are separate joins even when they reuse awarding-agency 014. California 7th District (CA-07) is not CA-25 or CA-02. Same awarding-agency code 014, different place-of-performance stamps, different dollar totals and row counts.

California federal spending shows how agency 014 sits beside other awarding agencies in the same state extract. $300,857,074.35 is one district-agency column, not the state table. This packet does not split California 7th District (CA-07) by county, city, or census tract. Awards that carry a different awarding-agency code stay on those other ties even if the work sounds related to Department of the Interior. The district-wide obligation total published here is $14,819,156,885.49; $300,857,074.35 is the Interior slice of that denominator.

USAspending obligations on this pair

USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $300,857,074.35 is that kind of sum for Department of the Interior inside CA-07 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. Assistance and contract awards can share the same awarding-agency rollup; this packet does not split them. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $300,857,074.35 as given.

California’s own budget is a separate ledger. Mixing it with the 371-row Interior cell leaves USAspending.gov. Treat 371 as award records in the aggregate, not unique vendors. Do not annualize without a year field in the packet. Do not per-capita or per-recipient the dollar total; those denominators are unpublished. The implied mean ($810,935.51) is a concentration statistic, not a typical CA-07 Interior payment.

Citing $300,857,074.35 without dropping a join side

Cite USAspending.gov: Department of the Interior (agency 014) obligated $300,857,074.35 on 371 awards coded to California 7th District (CA-07). Name Department of the Interior and California 7th District (CA-07) together. Keep the obligation word. If California 7th District or Department of the Interior has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not a park census, a land-acreage inventory, or a named-contractor file. 2.0% of $14,819,156,885.49 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score.

Row count versus dollar concentration

371 awards is a mid-size Interior file. Treat the count as action records, not parks, acres, or unique vendors. A large row count makes a program split tempting; the packet still does not supply one. A small row count makes a named-facility story tempting; the packet still does not name facilities or contractors. The implied mean (about $810,935.51) and the district share (2.0% of $14,819,156,885.49) are ratios of packet facts. Prefer California 7th District and Department of the Interior if the live tables moved.

Questions

How much Interior spending is coded to California 7th District (CA-07)?
USAspending.gov lists $300,857,074.35 in Department of the Interior obligations across 371 awards with place of performance in California 7th District (CA-07). Agency 014 × CA-07 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not California’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 2.0% of the district’s published total ($14,819,156,885.49). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $810,935.51, a ratio of those two facts only.
Does $300,857,074.35 include every Interior program in CA-07?
The packet publishes one awarding-agency rollup. The packet does not split Interior bureaus or contract versus assistance instruments. $300,857,074.35 is the combined obligation sum for agency 014 inside CA-07 coding. This page will not invent a program pie or name contractors. Open Department of the Interior and California 7th District to inspect parent tables. 371 remains an action count, not a program count.
Is $300,857,074.35 cash already paid in California 7th District (CA-07)?
No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $300,857,074.35 as checks already cleared in California 7th District (CA-07) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 371 awards. Prefer the live district and agency hubs if the tables moved.
Why is the implied average $810,935.51 not a typical award?
The average is $300,857,074.35 divided by 371 awards, about $810,935.51. Thick files pull the mean down; thin files pull it up. Neither case publishes a typical instrument. Modifications add rows. Recipients are unpublished. Use the ratio only as a concentration statistic.

USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to awarding agency. District 90/98 (multi/non-voting placeholders) are omitted. Obligations are not outlays.