Skip to main content
← All data ties

Department of the Interior in Montana 2nd District (MT-02)

USAspending.gov records $986,441,696.57 in Department of the Interior obligations with place of performance in Montana 2nd District (MT-02). That awarding-agency 014 cell is 9.9% of the district's $9,996,419,057.28 published book, not a park-acre inventory and not cash already paid. The join lists 815 award records. This page reports the pair, not a ranking of Montana districts.

Key figures

  • USAspending records $986,441,696.57 in Interior obligations in MT-02 (agency 014).
  • That cell is 9.9% of the district's $9,996,419,057.28 published book.
  • 815 award records are not a park census. MT-01 is a different district.
  • The total is commitments, not outlays. FEC donations do not fund this cell.

Interior × MT-02 is not the MT-01 cell

Agency 014 and Montana 2nd District (MT-02) meet in one place-of-performance cell. $986,441,696.57 is the obligation sum tagged to that pair. It is not the district's full $9,996,419,057.28 book, not every Interior dollar in Montana, and not an outlay. Montana 1st District is a different Interior join and is not folded into $986,441,696.57.

Eastern-Montana public-lands speech often treats both districts as one Interior market. This packet is MT-02 only. A reader who adds MT-01 invents a statewide Interior total the facts do not publish. Bureau splits, refuge names, and acre counts are unpublished. Correlation with public-lands news is not causation.

MT-02's district book beside agency 014

9.9% of $9,996,419,057.28 is tagged to Department of the Interior in this extract. Other awarding agencies fill the rest of Montana 2nd District. Adding those rows into $986,441,696.57 would double-count. The Montana 2nd District page at /districts/MT-02/ is the parent without an agency-014 filter.

Department of the Interior at /agencies/014/ drops the MT-02 filter. Montana federal spending at /states/mt/ drops the district cut. All spending ties at /ties/ indexes other pairs, including Interior in MT-01. Do not treat $986,441,696.57 as statewide Interior obligations.

815 award records are not a refuge roster

815 is the join award-record count, not unique vendors and not a park list. Dividing $986,441,696.57 by 815 is not a published typical invoice. Named contractors remain unpublished. Keep the row count on agency 014 × MT-02.

What Interior in MT-02 omits

No outlays, no bureau split, no named primes, no FEC overlay. Campaign donations do not fund these USAspending obligations. Place of performance is a geography tag, not proof that an Interior regional office sits in MT-02. Keep agency 014 and Montana 2nd District on the same citation as $986,441,696.57.

Citing Interior in Montana 2nd District

Name Department of the Interior (agency 014), Montana 2nd District (MT-02), $986,441,696.57 in obligations, and 815 award records on USAspending.gov. Quote /districts/MT-02/ for every awarding agency in MT-02 and /agencies/014/ for agency 014 without a district filter.

Reuse $986,441,696.57 only as Department of the Interior obligations with place of performance in MT-02. Filings remain on USAspending.gov. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset. Obligations of $986,441,696.57 are not outlays. Keep Department of the Interior (agency 014) and Montana 2nd District (MT-02) together when citing $986,441,696.57. The 815 award-record count is the join field, not a unique-vendor census. Obligations of $986,441,696.57 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. Do not add the district parent of $9,996,419,057.28 into this agency-014 cell. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. Place of performance in MT-02 is a geography tag, not a contractor roster. 9.9% is the published share of $9,996,419,057.28 tagged to Department of the Interior in this extract. Other awarding agencies on the Montana 2nd District hub sit outside $986,441,696.57. Reuse the figure only as the 014 × MT-02 obligation join. Later USAspending ingests can restate $986,441,696.57. Cite the pair as commitments, not as checks already cleared in Montana. The All spending ties index holds other keys. The join remains Department of the Interior (agency 014) with place of performance in Montana 2nd District (MT-02). $986,441,696.57 is the obligation total; 815 is the award-record count; $9,996,419,057.28 is the district parent. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays. The join remains Department of the Interior (agency 014) with place of performance in Montana 2nd District (MT-02). $986,441,696.57 is the obligation total; 815 is the award-record count; $9,996,419,057.28 is the district parent. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays.

Questions

How much did Interior obligate in Montana 2nd District?
USAspending.gov shows $986,441,696.57 in Department of the Interior obligations with place of performance in Montana 2nd District (MT-02). The sum is a commitment total, not outlays and not the district's $9,996,419,057.28 book. Other agencies in MT-02 sit outside this join.
Do 815 awards equal 815 parks in MT-02?
No. 815 is the join award-record count, not parks, acres, or unique vendors. The packet names no contractors. Keep agency 014 and MT-02 in the citation. Montana 1st District is a different Interior cell. 815 is the join award-record count, not a unique-recipient census.
Is this all Interior spending in Montana?
No. The join is awarding agency 014 crossed with MT-02 place of performance. The district parent is $9,996,419,057.28. Interior's share is 9.9%. MT-01 is a separate Interior join and is not inside $986,441,696.57.
Did FEC donations fund these Interior awards?
No. $986,441,696.57 is a USAspending obligation aggregate. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset and do not fund these awards. Outlays are unpublished. Cite agency 014 plus Montana 2nd District (MT-02). USAspending.gov remains the source for agency 014 in MT-02.

USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to awarding agency. District 90/98 (multi/non-voting placeholders) are omitted. Obligations are not outlays.