Department of the Interior obligations in Washington 8th District (WA-08)
The Interior × WA-08 cell on USAspending.gov is $273,772,680.02 in obligations across 206 awards. Two hundred six Interior-coded awards cover about ten percent of WA-08’s district obligation total, a majority-adjacent Interior slice of a two-and-a-half-billion-dollar district book. That pair is Department of the Interior and Washington 8th District (WA-08) — not Washington’s entire federal inflow, not Department of the Interior nationwide, and not cash already paid. The cell is 10.3% of this district’s published obligation total ($2,656,589,312.42). Implied average obligation is about $1,328,993.59 ($273,772,680.02 ÷ 206). Correlation is not causation.
Key figures
- Interior in Washington 8th District (WA-08): $273,772,680.02 across 206 USAspending awards.
- Implied mean about $1,328,993.59 per record; district share 10.3% of $2,656,589,312.42.
- Agency 014 × WA-08 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a named-recipient list.
- Cite USAspending.gov; quote Washington 8th District and Department of the Interior if live tables moved.
- Washington federal spending and All spending ties are parents and an index, not amounts to add into $273,772,680.02.
A place-of-performance join: Interior × WA-08
Awarding agency 014 and congressional district WA-08 meet here. $273,772,680.02 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Department of the Interior’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to Washington 8th District (WA-08), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split Interior bureaus or contract versus assistance instruments. 206 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. It is not a park census, a land-acreage inventory, or a named-contractor file.
Dividing $273,772,680.02 by 206 yields about $1,328,993.59 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical contract, grant, or benefit line. 206 awards is a compact-to-moderate Interior file. The implied mean is a ratio of two packet facts, not a posted land-management invoice. Do not treat WA-08’s 014 cell as a synonym for every Interior account nationwide. Open Washington 8th District for the district table without this agency filter, Department of the Interior for agency 014 without the WA-08 filter, Washington federal spending for every awarding agency in the Washington extract, and All spending ties for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $273,772,680.02.
Department of the Interior as awarding agency, not as a named-vendor list
USAspending labels awarding agency 014 as Department of the Interior. That code produced $273,772,680.02 when crossed with Washington 8th District (WA-08) place of performance. The agency-wide 014 hub does not require WA-08 geography. The district hub does not require Interior. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 206 awards. The packet does not split Interior bureaus or contract versus assistance instruments.
Correlation is not causation: Washington 8th District (WA-08) did not “cause” $273,772,680.02 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 014 × WA-08 only. It is not a park census, a land-acreage inventory, or a named-contractor file. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.
Place of performance for Washington 8th District (WA-08)
Washington 8th District (WA-08) on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list WA-08 while later work occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other Washington districts belong on those ties even when the awarding agency is also 014. Washington 8th District (WA-08) is a numbered congressional place-of-performance code inside Washington. Other Washington districts are separate joins even when they reuse awarding-agency 014. Washington 8th District (WA-08) is a numbered place-of-performance code inside Washington. Other Washington districts are not this join. The packet does not publish a city split.
Obligation math for this join
USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $273,772,680.02 is that kind of sum for Department of the Interior inside WA-08 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. Assistance and contract awards can share the same awarding-agency rollup; this packet does not split them. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $273,772,680.02 as given.
Washington’s own budget is a separate ledger. Mixing it with the 206-row Interior cell leaves USAspending.gov. Treat 206 as award records in the aggregate, not unique vendors. Do not annualize without a year field in the packet. Do not per-capita or per-recipient the dollar total; those denominators are unpublished. The implied mean ($1,328,993.59) is a concentration statistic, not a typical WA-08 Interior payment.
What a complete citation includes
Cite USAspending.gov: Department of the Interior (agency 014) obligated $273,772,680.02 on 206 awards coded to Washington 8th District (WA-08). Name Department of the Interior and Washington 8th District (WA-08) together. Keep the obligation word. If Washington 8th District or Department of the Interior has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not a park census, a land-acreage inventory, or a named-contractor file. 10.3% of $2,656,589,312.42 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score.
Using 10.3% and $1,328,993.59 without overclaiming
206 awards is a compact-to-moderate Interior file. The implied mean is a ratio of two packet facts, not a posted land-management invoice. A large row count makes a program split tempting; the packet still does not supply one. A small row count makes a named-facility story tempting; the packet still does not name facilities or contractors. The implied mean (about $1,328,993.59) and the district share (10.3% of $2,656,589,312.42) are ratios of packet facts. Prefer Washington 8th District and Department of the Interior if the live tables moved.
Do not rank Washington 8th District (WA-08) as more Interior-dependent than neighboring districts on the strength of this cell alone. Neighboring geographies have their own 014 ties with different dollar totals, or no published 014 cell in this harvest. This snapshot holds $273,772,680.02 and 206 only. All spending ties is the index, not an addend. Obligations are not outlays. Correlation is not causation.
Questions
- How much Interior spending is coded to Washington 8th District (WA-08)?
- USAspending.gov lists $273,772,680.02 in Department of the Interior obligations across 206 awards with place of performance in Washington 8th District (WA-08). Agency 014 × WA-08 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Washington’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 10.3% of the district’s published total ($2,656,589,312.42). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $1,328,993.59, a ratio of those two facts only.
- Does $273,772,680.02 include every Interior program in WA-08?
- The packet publishes one awarding-agency rollup. The packet does not split Interior bureaus or contract versus assistance instruments. $273,772,680.02 is the combined obligation sum for agency 014 inside WA-08 coding. This page will not invent a program pie or name contractors. Open Department of the Interior and Washington 8th District to inspect parent tables. 206 remains an action count, not a program count.
- Is $273,772,680.02 cash already paid in Washington 8th District (WA-08)?
- No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $273,772,680.02 as checks already cleared in Washington 8th District (WA-08) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 206 awards. Prefer the live district and agency hubs if the tables moved.
- Is Washington 8th District (WA-08) ranked against other Washington districts here?
- No. This page does not rank Washington 8th District (WA-08) as a winner or loser. $273,772,680.02 and 206 describe one join. Neighboring districts have their own cells. District 90/98 placeholders are omitted. Cite Department of the Interior and Washington 8th District (WA-08) together without a league table.
USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to awarding agency. District 90/98 (multi/non-voting placeholders) are omitted. Obligations are not outlays.