Department of the Treasury (agency 014) obligations in Computer Systems Design (NAICS 541512)

Treasury 014 × 541512 is a systems-design join, not agency 020’s cell

The relationship is mechanical: awarding agency 014 and industry 541512 on the same award roll into $3,939,740,209.92. The join is awarding-agency 014 crossed with NAICS 541512, not agency 020’s systems-design cell and not Treasury 014’s entire $92,383,199,595.16 book. Remove either filter and the number changes. This page never claims the pair caused the other side to exist. The extract does not list system names, bureau names, or vendor names.

470 award lines can look sparse or crowded. Either way, 470 is not equal 470 systems or 470 IT vendors. USAspending counts award records. Unique recipients remain off this packet. Other computer related services (541519) for agency 014 sit outside this total unless they also carry 541512. Neighboring codes stay outside $3,939,740,209.92.

470 awards behind $3.9 billion

About $8.38 million per award comes from dividing $3,939,740,209.92 by 470. Use that ratio as a scale check, not as a typical systems-design invoice and not a cost per seat. Count is not a count of systems, bureaus, or vendors. The agency parent remains $92,383,199,595.16; this slice is about 4.3% of that book.

Four hundred seventy lines belong on the agency 014 table. This page will not list vendors. Open Department of the Treasury for the agency hub. This page will not invent a map of Treasury 014 systems or a systems census. IRS-modernization folklore is not a project list, and it is not a reason to merge 014 with 020. Correlation with a published Treasury IT-system count is not a packet finding.

Systems-design obligations are not systems already accepted

NAICS 541512 is a computer systems design-services label on the award file. Quote $3,939,740,209.92 as obligations, not a punch-list of systems already accepted. A Treasury 014 IT portfolio table with a year stamp is not this file. No fiscal year is attached here.

This extract does not split bureaus inside agency 014, and it does not merge 014 with 020. The -2 suffix marks a duplicate Treasury × 541512 slug; the disambiguator is agency 014. Those splits are not in the facts.

What the Treasury 014 × 541512 table omits

Omitted: system names, bureau names, or vendor names. Cited: $3,939,740,209.92, 470 awards, agency 014, NAICS 541512, parent $92,383,199,595.16. Cite agency 014 in the headline so this cell is not confused with agency 020’s 541512 join.

NAICS 541512 holds NAICS 541512 nationwide. All agencies lists agencies. All spending ties lists ties. Campaign contributions do not pay these obligations. Keep the pair intact when you quote $3,939,740,209.92.

Where the Treasury 014 × NAICS 541512 hubs live

Department of the Treasury is the agency 014 hub behind $92,383,199,595.16. NAICS 541512 is the nationwide NAICS 541512 listing. All agencies lists awarding agencies. All spending ties indexes other ties. 470 awards totaling $3,939,740,209.92 remain a systems-design administrative file, not a bureau census. Name agency 014 in the citation. Agency 020’s 541512 join is a different parent book. USAspending.gov is the source. Do not annualize $3,939,740,209.92: no fiscal year is in the facts. Do not add those parent shelves into this cell.

How to read the Treasury 014 × 541512 pair

Cite agency 014 (Department of the Treasury), NAICS 541512 (Computer Systems Design Services), $3,939,740,209.92, and 470 awards together. Keep the obligation word. The join is the intersection, not a story about why the agency buys this industry, and not a claim that Computer Systems Design Services caused the agency’s mission. Leave this page for named lines on Department of the Treasury. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these obligations. If a later extract revises the rollup, this snapshot will be stale until rebuilt. Name agency 014 in the citation. Agency 020’s 541512 join is a different parent book. Readers who reuse this agency-industry snapshot should keep both keys in the same sentence, cite USAspending.gov, and treat award rows as records rather than unique vendors. This narrative does not invent a fiscal year, a recipient list, or an outlay total the packet omitted. Keep the obligation word on the headline dollar figure in every footnote.

Questions

How much Treasury agency 014 spending is coded to NAICS 541512?

USAspending.gov shows $3,939,740,209.92 in obligations for Department of the Treasury (agency 014) coded to NAICS 541512, across 470 awards. The sum is a commitment total, not outlays and not the agency’s full $92,383,199,595.16 book. Other industries are outside this join unless they also carry 541512.

Do 470 awards mean 470 IT systems?

No. Award count is a row count of 470 actions and can include continuations. It is not a count of systems, bureaus, or vendors. The packet does not name recipients. See Department of the Treasury for named lines as USAspending stored them.

Why does this slug end in -2?

Two awarding-agency codes share the Treasury name. This page is agency 014 × NAICS 541512. Agency 020 has a separate 541512 join. The -2 suffix marks the duplicate slug; cite 014 in the headline. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Are these systems-design dollars already paid?

Not on this metric. Obligations are recorded commitments on awards. Outlays are payments from the Treasury. The $3,939,740,209.92 headline is the obligation rollup in SpendingVault’s extract. Remaining balances are not published in this packet. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.