Department of the Treasury in California 36th District (CA-36)

Treasury obligations coded to California 36th District (CA-36)

USAspending.gov stores this cell as agency 020 × CA-36. $327,144,273 is the obligation sum for Department of the Treasury with California 36th District (CA-36) place of performance. It is not California's statewide Department of the Treasury total and not an outlay. Quote California 36th District and Department of the Treasury as parents. Correlation is not causation.

73 is an award-action count. Modifications and delivery orders can add rows. Unique vendors are unpublished. Dividing $327,144,273 by 73 yields about $4,481,428.40 per award, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical invoice. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these obligations. 73 awards is a modest action file. Modifications and delivery orders can add rows without adding unique recipients.

Department of the Treasury as awarding agency 020

Agency 020 is stored as Department of the Treasury. The awarding-agency field does not name bureaus, fiscal agents, or financial institutions. This packet lists none of them. Confusing this join with California statewide Treasury totals or another California district's Treasury cell would be a different overlay. Packet facts on the agency side are the name Department of the Treasury, code 020, and the join dollars $327,144,273. Any other recipient or installation list would be invented.

Department of the Treasury drops the district filter. Other districts with Department of the Treasury awards are other ties. This page quotes only California 36th District (CA-36). Do not rank CA-36 as more Treasury-dependent than neighboring California districts on the strength of this cell alone. IRS and fiscal-service narratives are outside the facts. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell.

California 36th District (CA-36) as place of performance

California 36th District (CA-36) is a numbered congressional geography stamp, not a claim that Treasury work stayed inside that district's current lines. Other California districts are separate joins even when they reuse awarding-agency 020. Place of performance CA-36 is a geography field in the award file. It does not prove residency of workers or vendors. California federal spending is the statewide parent and includes other districts.

The district's all-agency obligation total is $43,332,669,736.78. $327,144,273 is the Department of the Treasury slice of that book, about 0.8%. Remaining district dollars sit with other awarding agencies on California 36th District, not inside this join. District 90/98 multi and non-voting placeholders are omitted from this harvest by design.

Seventy-three award rows versus the district-wide book

73 awards against $327,144,273 implies about $4,481,428.40 per award. That mean is not a unit price and not a jobs figure. With 73 rows, a few large instruments can dominate. Treat the count as records in an aggregate, not as 73 finished projects. All spending ties lists other pairs. Do not annualize without a year field in the packet. Do not per-capita or per-recipient the dollar total; those denominators are unpublished.

What the Treasury × CA-36 pair cannot prove

An obligation is a legal commitment. $327,144,273 is that kind of sum for Department of the Treasury inside CA-36 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. This packet has no outlay total and no fiscal-year split. Citing the figure as cash already spent in California 36th District (CA-36) over-reads the field. Do not rank California 36th District (CA-36) as a winner or loser versus other districts. Keep both sides in the citation: Department of the Treasury and California 36th District (CA-36).

Parent hubs around this Treasury overlay

Open California 36th District for the district rollup, Department of the Treasury for the agency rollup, California federal spending for California statewide spending, and All spending ties for other pairs. None of those links convert this cell into California statewide Treasury totals or another California district's Treasury cell, into outlays this packet omits, or into a contractor list. Cite Department of the Treasury in California 36th District (CA-36), $327,144,273, 73 awards, USAspending.gov, obligations only. Do not rank CA-36 as more Treasury-dependent than neighboring California districts on the strength of this cell alone. IRS and fiscal-service narratives are outside the facts. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell.

Questions

How much Treasury spending is coded to California 36th District (CA-36)?

USAspending.gov records $327,144,273 in Department of the Treasury obligations with California 36th District (CA-36) place of performance across 73 awards. That is an obligation aggregate for the district-agency pair, not an outlay and not California's complete federal ledger.

Does 73 awards mean 73 banks or tax offices?

No. 73 is an award-action count and can include modifications. Unique vendors are not published. Average obligation is about $4,481,428.40 per award, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical invoice. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Is this California's entire Department of the Treasury total?

No. $327,144,273 is only the Department of the Treasury slice tagged to California 36th District (CA-36). California federal spending is the statewide parent. California 36th District includes other awarding agencies in the same district. Mixing those books into this total would overstate the join.

Where is the live Treasury in California 36th District table?

California 36th District is the district parent. Department of the Treasury is the agency hub. California federal spending is the California parent. All spending ties lists other pairs. Prefer those tables after later ingests; this page quotes Department of the Treasury × CA-36 at $327,144,273.