Skip to main content
← All data ties

Department of the Treasury (agency 020) federal obligations in Washington

USAspending.gov records $7,864,106,507.14 in Department of the Treasury obligations under awarding agency 020 with place of performance in Washington state, across 173 awards. The cell is extremely concentrated: 173 records under $7.86 billion. Mean obligation is about $45.46 million per award ($7,864,106,507.14 ÷ 173). Washington here is the state (WA), not the District of Columbia.

Key figures

  • Treasury agency 020 shows $7,864,106,507.14 in Washington state (WA) place-of-performance obligations on 173 awards.
  • Mean obligation is about $45.46 million per award.
  • WA is the state, not the District of Columbia.
  • A different Treasury code has a separate Washington overlay.
  • USAspending obligations are not outlays.

A thin Treasury 020 table in Washington state

One hundred seventy-three awards totaling $7,864,106,507.14 means a small number of rows carry a large obligation sum. The mean near $45.46 million is a quotient, not a typical invoice. A few large awards could dominate; without a distribution, that remains a possibility rather than a demonstrated fact.

The join is agency 020 plus state WA. It is not a measure of Washington’s tax collections and not a list of Seattle-area banks. Another Washington Treasury page uses a different agency code; that overlay is not this $7,864,106,507.14 cell.

One hundred seventy-three Washington state 020 awards under $7,864,106,507.14 should never be described as District of Columbia spending. WA and DC are different USAspending state codes. A second Washington overlay uses another Treasury code and a larger award count; that is a different URL. This page owns 173 rows and $7,864,106,507.14 only.

Agency 020 versus other Treasury codes

Overlay /states/wa/agencies/020/ is the path that matches 173 awards. A separate Washington tie uses code 014. English labels can match; codes and dollar totals do not. This page stays on 020.

The agency hub /agencies/020/ is nationwide. This narrative does not compute 020’s share outside Washington.

WA place of performance, not DC

USAspending’s state code WA is Washington state. District of Columbia uses DC. Confusing the two geographies would dump capital-region awards into this $7,864,106,507.14 total or strip them out incorrectly. The parent hub is Washington federal spending — the state page.

Within the state, Seattle, Spokane, and other localities can share one bucket. No metro split is in the facts.

Washington federal spending — the state hub — is the parent. Seattle and Spokane are not split out of the 173-award set. The mean near $45.46 million is a warning that the table is thin, not a typical invoice. Obligations remain commitments. Outlays are unreported.

Obligations on 173 awards

$7,864,106,507.14 is obligations, not outlays. No fiscal year is supplied. The award count is a record count, not a count of Washington taxpayers or Treasury facilities.

Mean obligation of about $45.46 million is among the higher means in this batch of joins, which follows directly from dividing a multi-billion total by 173. High means are table shape, not a performance rating.

Washington state Treasury 020’s 173 awards totaling $7,864,106,507.14 must be labeled WA in the same sentence as the dollars. DC is a different code. A second Washington Treasury overlay uses another agency code and more rows. This page owns 173 records and $7,864,106,507.14. The mean near $45.46 million flags a thin table. Seattle is not split out.

What the pair is not

This join does not claim Treasury spending caused Washington’s employment mix. It records co-occurrence of agency 020 and state WA on 173 awards. Campaign-finance data is not included.

See Department of the Treasury in Washington, Washington federal spending, Department of the Treasury, and All spending ties.

One hundred seventy-three Washington state Treasury 020 awards under $7,864,106,507.14 is a thin table. A separate Washington overlay uses another Treasury code and a higher award count; that page is not merged here. WA is the state. DC is a different geography.

Keeping WA, DC, and Treasury codes straight

Department of the Treasury in Washington is the 020 overlay for state WA. Washington federal spending is the state parent — not a District hub. Department of the Treasury at /agencies/020/ is the national 020 profile. All spending ties lists other pairs. Match both the state code and the agency code before comparing Treasury pages.

The mean near $45.46 million follows from dividing $7,864,106,507.14 by 173. A handful of rows can dominate a 173-record table. Those rows are unnamed here. 173 is not a taxpayer count. Obligations are not outlays. No fiscal year is attached. The pair does not claim Treasury spending caused Washington employment change.

Anyone citing $7,864,106,507.14 should say Washington state (WA) and agency 020 in the same breath. DC is a different geography. Another Washington Treasury overlay uses a different code. The 173-award count belongs here. Continue at the 020 overlay, the state hub, the national 020 profile, and the ties index. The mean near $45.46 million is a thin-table warning, not a typical invoice.

Questions

How much has Treasury obligated in Washington state?
USAspending records $7,864,106,507.14 in agency 020 obligations with Washington (WA) place of performance, across 173 awards. That is the state, not the District of Columbia, and it is obligations, not outlays.
Is this Washington, DC?
No. The state code is WA. The District of Columbia uses DC and has its own Treasury ties. This $7,864,106,507.14 total is Washington state.
Why only 173 awards?
The aggregate counts 173 records for agency 020 and WA. Dividing $7,864,106,507.14 by 173 yields a mean of about $45.46 million. The facts do not list those records individually.
Is there another Treasury–Washington page?
Yes. A separate overlay uses a different agency code. This page is 020 only: 173 awards and $7,864,106,507.14.

USAspending.gov aggregate of federal obligations by state and awarding agency. Obligations are not outlays.