Department of Transportation in Oklahoma 3rd District (OK-03)
USAspending.gov records $1,346,653,276.83 in Department of Transportation obligations with place of performance in Oklahoma 3rd District (OK-03). That awarding-agency 069 cell is 15.5% of the district's $8,703,263,954.91 published book, not a highway-mile inventory and not cash already paid. The join lists 1,293 award records. This page reports the pair, not a ranking of Oklahoma districts and not a roster of named contractors.
Key figures
- USAspending records $1,346,653,276.83 in Transportation obligations in OK-03 (agency 069).
- That cell is 15.5% of the district's $8,703,263,954.91 published book.
- 1,293 award records are not a unique-contractor census.
- The total is commitments, not outlays. FEC donations do not fund this cell.
What the Transportation–OK-03 join is
Agency 069 and Oklahoma 3rd District (OK-03) meet in one place-of-performance cell. $1,346,653,276.83 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum tagged to that pair. It is not the district's full $8,703,263,954.91 book, not every Transportation dollar in Oklahoma, and not an outlay. The Oklahoma 3rd District hub still lists other awarding agencies; the Department of Transportation hub still lists other districts. Only this intersection is reported here.
Surface-transportation speech often names highways, bridges, transit, and aviation in one breath. This packet does not split $1,346,653,276.83 among those modes, name primes, or count projects. A reader who assigns the cell to a single grant program or a single vendor adds a label the facts do not carry. Correlation with infrastructure news is not causation.
OK-03's district book beside agency 069
15.5% of $8,703,263,954.91 is tagged to Department of Transportation in this extract. The remainder sits on other awarding-agency rows for the same district. Adding those rows back into $1,346,653,276.83 would double-count. The Oklahoma 3rd District page at /districts/OK-03/ is the parent without an agency-069 filter.
Department of Transportation at /agencies/069/ is the parent without an OK-03 filter. Oklahoma federal spending at /states/ok/ drops the district cut. Do not treat $1,346,653,276.83 as statewide Transportation obligations. All spending ties at /ties/ indexes other district–agency pairs. Obligations remain commitments, not checks cleared.
1,293 award records are not a contractor census
1,293 is the award-record count published with this Department of Transportation × OK-03 cell, not a count of unique vendors and not a project inventory. Dividing $1,346,653,276.83 by 1,293 would invent a typical invoice the packet never computed. Modifications and multi-year vehicles can add lines without adding recipients. Named contractors are unpublished.
What the Transportation OK-03 table omits
No outlays, no mode split, no NAICS mix, no named primes. Campaign donations recorded on FEC.gov do not fund this USAspending cell. Place of performance is a geography tag, not proof that headquarters sit in OK-03. District 90/98 placeholders are omitted from this extract. Keep agency 069 and Oklahoma 3rd District on the same citation as $1,346,653,276.83.
Citing Transportation in Oklahoma 3rd District
A clean footnote names Department of Transportation (agency 069), Oklahoma 3rd District (OK-03), $1,346,653,276.83 in obligations, and 1,293 award records on USAspending.gov. Keep the obligation word. Quote the district hub if you need every awarding agency in OK-03, and quote the Transportation hub if you need agency 069 without the district filter.
Reuse $1,346,653,276.83 only as Department of Transportation obligations with place of performance in OK-03. The 1,293 award-record count stays on this join. Filings remain on USAspending.gov. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset. Keep Department of Transportation (agency 069) and Oklahoma 3rd District (OK-03) together when citing $1,346,653,276.83. The 1,293 award-record count is the join field, not a unique-vendor census. Obligations of $1,346,653,276.83 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. Do not add the district parent of $8,703,263,954.91 into this agency-069 cell. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. Place of performance in OK-03 is a geography tag, not a contractor roster. 15.5% is the published share of $8,703,263,954.91 tagged to Department of Transportation in this extract. Other awarding agencies on the Oklahoma 3rd District hub sit outside $1,346,653,276.83. Reuse the figure only as the 069 × OK-03 obligation join. Later USAspending ingests can restate $1,346,653,276.83. Cite the pair as commitments, not as checks already cleared in Oklahoma. The All spending ties index holds other keys.
Questions
- How much did Transportation obligate in Oklahoma 3rd District?
- USAspending.gov shows $1,346,653,276.83 in Department of Transportation obligations with place of performance in Oklahoma 3rd District (OK-03). The sum is a commitment total, not outlays and not the district's full $8,703,263,954.91 book. Other agencies in OK-03 sit outside this join.
- Do 1,293 awards equal 1,293 highway contractors in OK-03?
- No. The packet publishes 1,293 as the join award-record count, not as unique vendors or named projects. The extract does not name contractors. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. Keep both sides of the join—agency 069 and OK-03—in the citation.
- Is this all federal spending in Oklahoma 3rd District?
- No. The join is awarding agency 069 crossed with OK-03 place of performance. The district parent in this packet is $8,703,263,954.91. Transportation's share of that book is 15.5%. Other awarding agencies are separate cells on the district hub.
- Did FEC donations fund these Transportation awards?
- No. $1,346,653,276.83 is a USAspending obligation aggregate. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset and do not fund these awards. Outlays are unpublished. Cite agency 069 plus Oklahoma 3rd District (OK-03). USAspending.gov remains the source for agency 069 in OK-03.
USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to awarding agency. District 90/98 (multi/non-voting placeholders) are omitted. Obligations are not outlays.