Skip to main content
← All data ties

Department of Transportation in Oklahoma 3rd District (OK-03)

USAspending.gov records $1,346,653,276.83 in Department of Transportation obligations with place of performance in Oklahoma 3rd District (OK-03). That awarding-agency 069 cell is 15.5% of the district's $8,703,263,954.91 published book, not a highway-mile inventory and not cash already paid. The join lists 1,293 award records. This page reports the pair, not a ranking of Oklahoma districts and not a roster of named contractors.

Key figures

  • USAspending records $1,346,653,276.83 in Transportation obligations in OK-03 (agency 069).
  • That cell is 15.5% of the district's $8,703,263,954.91 published book.
  • 1,293 award records are not a unique-contractor census.
  • The total is commitments, not outlays. FEC donations do not fund this cell.

What the Transportation–OK-03 join is

Agency 069 and Oklahoma 3rd District (OK-03) meet in one place-of-performance cell. $1,346,653,276.83 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum tagged to that pair. It is not the district's full $8,703,263,954.91 book, not every Transportation dollar in Oklahoma, and not an outlay. The Oklahoma 3rd District hub still lists other awarding agencies; the Department of Transportation hub still lists other districts. Only this intersection is reported here.

Surface-transportation speech often names highways, bridges, transit, and aviation in one breath. This packet does not split $1,346,653,276.83 among those modes, name primes, or count projects. A reader who assigns the cell to a single grant program or a single vendor adds a label the facts do not carry. Correlation with infrastructure news is not causation.

OK-03's district book beside agency 069

15.5% of $8,703,263,954.91 is tagged to Department of Transportation in this extract. The remainder sits on other awarding-agency rows for the same district. Adding those rows back into $1,346,653,276.83 would double-count. The Oklahoma 3rd District page at /districts/OK-03/ is the parent without an agency-069 filter.

Department of Transportation at /agencies/069/ is the parent without an OK-03 filter. Oklahoma federal spending at /states/ok/ drops the district cut. Do not treat $1,346,653,276.83 as statewide Transportation obligations. All spending ties at /ties/ indexes other district–agency pairs. Obligations remain commitments, not checks cleared.

1,293 award records are not a contractor census

1,293 is the award-record count published with this Department of Transportation × OK-03 cell, not a count of unique vendors and not a project inventory. Dividing $1,346,653,276.83 by 1,293 would invent a typical invoice the packet never computed. Modifications and multi-year vehicles can add lines without adding recipients. Named contractors are unpublished.

What the Transportation OK-03 table omits

No outlays, no mode split, no NAICS mix, no named primes. Campaign donations recorded on FEC.gov do not fund this USAspending cell. Place of performance is a geography tag, not proof that headquarters sit in OK-03. District 90/98 placeholders are omitted from this extract. Keep agency 069 and Oklahoma 3rd District on the same citation as $1,346,653,276.83.

Citing Transportation in Oklahoma 3rd District

A clean footnote names Department of Transportation (agency 069), Oklahoma 3rd District (OK-03), $1,346,653,276.83 in obligations, and 1,293 award records on USAspending.gov. Keep the obligation word. Quote the district hub if you need every awarding agency in OK-03, and quote the Transportation hub if you need agency 069 without the district filter.

Reuse $1,346,653,276.83 only as Department of Transportation obligations with place of performance in OK-03. The 1,293 award-record count stays on this join. Filings remain on USAspending.gov. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset. Keep Department of Transportation (agency 069) and Oklahoma 3rd District (OK-03) together when citing $1,346,653,276.83. The 1,293 award-record count is the join field, not a unique-vendor census. Obligations of $1,346,653,276.83 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. Do not add the district parent of $8,703,263,954.91 into this agency-069 cell. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. Place of performance in OK-03 is a geography tag, not a contractor roster. 15.5% is the published share of $8,703,263,954.91 tagged to Department of Transportation in this extract. Other awarding agencies on the Oklahoma 3rd District hub sit outside $1,346,653,276.83. Reuse the figure only as the 069 × OK-03 obligation join. Later USAspending ingests can restate $1,346,653,276.83. Cite the pair as commitments, not as checks already cleared in Oklahoma. The All spending ties index holds other keys.

Questions

How much did Transportation obligate in Oklahoma 3rd District?
USAspending.gov shows $1,346,653,276.83 in Department of Transportation obligations with place of performance in Oklahoma 3rd District (OK-03). The sum is a commitment total, not outlays and not the district's full $8,703,263,954.91 book. Other agencies in OK-03 sit outside this join.
Do 1,293 awards equal 1,293 highway contractors in OK-03?
No. The packet publishes 1,293 as the join award-record count, not as unique vendors or named projects. The extract does not name contractors. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. Keep both sides of the join—agency 069 and OK-03—in the citation.
Is this all federal spending in Oklahoma 3rd District?
No. The join is awarding agency 069 crossed with OK-03 place of performance. The district parent in this packet is $8,703,263,954.91. Transportation's share of that book is 15.5%. Other awarding agencies are separate cells on the district hub.
Did FEC donations fund these Transportation awards?
No. $1,346,653,276.83 is a USAspending obligation aggregate. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset and do not fund these awards. Outlays are unpublished. Cite agency 069 plus Oklahoma 3rd District (OK-03). USAspending.gov remains the source for agency 069 in OK-03.

USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to awarding agency. District 90/98 (multi/non-voting placeholders) are omitted. Obligations are not outlays.