Department of Veterans Affairs in Virginia 2nd District (VA-02)
USAspending.gov records $1,330,136,443.36 in Department of Veterans Affairs obligations with place of performance in Virginia 2nd District (VA-02). That awarding-agency 036 cell is 7.2% of the district's $18,441,444,277.67 published book, not a hospital census and not cash already paid. The join lists 1,156 award records. This page reports the pair, not a ranking of Virginia districts and not a list of named facilities.
Key figures
- USAspending records $1,330,136,443.36 in Veterans Affairs obligations in VA-02 (agency 036).
- That cell is 7.2% of the district's $18,441,444,277.67 published book.
- 1,156 award records are not a clinic or contractor census.
- The total is commitments, not outlays. FEC donations do not fund this cell.
What the Veterans Affairs–VA-02 join is
Agency 036 and Virginia 2nd District (VA-02) meet in one place-of-performance cell. $1,330,136,443.36 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum tagged to that pair. It is not the district's full $18,441,444,277.67 book, not every Veterans Affairs dollar in Virginia, and not an outlay. The Virginia 2nd District hub still lists other awarding agencies; the Department of Veterans Affairs hub still lists other districts. Only this intersection is reported here.
Veterans-care speech often names medical centers, clinics, and benefits offices in one breath. This packet does not split $1,330,136,443.36 among those sites, name primes, or count patients. A reader who assigns the cell to a single facility or a single vendor adds a label the facts do not carry. Correlation with local health news is not causation.
VA-02's district book beside agency 036
7.2% of $18,441,444,277.67 is tagged to Department of Veterans Affairs in this extract. The remainder sits on other awarding-agency rows for the same district. Adding those rows back into $1,330,136,443.36 would double-count. The Virginia 2nd District page at /districts/VA-02/ is the parent without an agency-036 filter.
Department of Veterans Affairs at /agencies/036/ is the parent without a VA-02 filter. Virginia federal spending at /states/va/ drops the district cut. Do not treat $1,330,136,443.36 as statewide Veterans Affairs obligations. All spending ties at /ties/ indexes other district–agency pairs. Obligations remain commitments, not checks cleared.
1,156 award records are not a facility census
1,156 is the award-record count published with this Department of Veterans Affairs × VA-02 cell, not a count of clinics and not unique vendors. Dividing $1,330,136,443.36 by 1,156 would invent a typical invoice the packet never computed. Modifications can add lines without adding recipients. Named contractors and medical centers are unpublished.
What the Veterans Affairs VA-02 table omits
No outlays, no facility split, no patient counts, no named primes. Campaign donations recorded on FEC.gov do not fund this USAspending cell. Place of performance is a geography tag, not proof that a medical center headquarters sits in VA-02. Keep agency 036 and Virginia 2nd District on the same citation as $1,330,136,443.36.
Citing Veterans Affairs in Virginia 2nd District
A clean footnote names Department of Veterans Affairs (agency 036), Virginia 2nd District (VA-02), $1,330,136,443.36 in obligations, and 1,156 award records on USAspending.gov. Keep the obligation word. Quote the district hub if you need every awarding agency in VA-02, and quote the Veterans Affairs hub if you need agency 036 without the district filter.
Reuse $1,330,136,443.36 only as Department of Veterans Affairs obligations with place of performance in VA-02. The 1,156 award-record count stays on this join. Filings remain on USAspending.gov. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset. Keep Department of Veterans Affairs (agency 036) and Virginia 2nd District (VA-02) together when citing $1,330,136,443.36. The 1,156 award-record count is the join field, not a unique-vendor census. Obligations of $1,330,136,443.36 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. Do not add the district parent of $18,441,444,277.67 into this agency-036 cell. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. Place of performance in VA-02 is a geography tag, not a contractor roster. 7.2% is the published share of $18,441,444,277.67 tagged to Department of Veterans Affairs in this extract. Other awarding agencies on the Virginia 2nd District hub sit outside $1,330,136,443.36. Reuse the figure only as the 036 × VA-02 obligation join. Later USAspending ingests can restate $1,330,136,443.36. Cite the pair as commitments, not as checks already cleared in Virginia. The All spending ties index holds other keys.
Questions
- How much did Veterans Affairs obligate in Virginia 2nd District?
- USAspending.gov shows $1,330,136,443.36 in Department of Veterans Affairs obligations with place of performance in Virginia 2nd District (VA-02). The sum is a commitment total, not outlays and not the district's full $18,441,444,277.67 book. Other agencies in VA-02 sit outside this join.
- Do 1,156 awards equal 1,156 VA clinics in VA-02?
- No. The packet publishes 1,156 as the join award-record count, not as clinics, unique vendors, or named facilities. The extract does not name contractors. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. Keep agency 036 and VA-02 in the citation.
- Is this all federal spending in Virginia 2nd District?
- No. The join is awarding agency 036 crossed with VA-02 place of performance. The district parent in this packet is $18,441,444,277.67. Veterans Affairs' share of that book is 7.2%. Other awarding agencies are separate cells on the district hub.
- Did FEC donations fund these Veterans Affairs awards?
- No. $1,330,136,443.36 is a USAspending obligation aggregate. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset and do not fund these awards. Outlays are unpublished. Cite agency 036 plus Virginia 2nd District (VA-02). USAspending.gov remains the source for agency 036 in VA-02.
USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to awarding agency. District 90/98 (multi/non-voting placeholders) are omitted. Obligations are not outlays.