Drinking Water SRF in California 22nd District (CA-22)

CFDA 66.468 filtered to CA-22

This page exists because two tables meet: catalog 66.468 and congressional district CA-22. $871,780,000 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Drinking Water State Revolving Fund nationwide, not the full $3,267,365,148.80 district book, and not an outlay register. The packet does not split treatment plants from distribution work and does not name systems. 7 is an action count — modifications and continuations add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. The pair is not a water-system census, a pipe-mile inventory, or a named-utility roster.

The join is a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (CFDA 66.468) catalog line, not a tap-water quality score. $871,780,000 sits next to a district-wide obligation total of $3,267,365,148.80; the 26.7% share is arithmetic, not a scoreboard of California districts. District 90 and 98 placeholders are omitted from this harvest. Obligations are not outlays. A 26.7% district share is arithmetic on packet facts, not a ranking of California districts as winners or losers.

Keeping 66.468 from becoming a recipient list

USAspending titles CFDA 66.468 as Drinking Water State Revolving Fund. Crossing that catalog with California 22nd District (CA-22) place of performance produced $871,780,000. The national 66.468 hub does not require CA-22. The district hub does not require Drinking Water SRF. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 7 awards. The packet does not split treatment plants from distribution work and does not name systems.

Correlation is not causation: California 22nd District (CA-22) did not generate $871,780,000 merely by existing as a geography. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 66.468 × CA-22 only. It is not a water-system census, a pipe-mile inventory, or a named-utility roster. Do not invent contractors or award recipients. FEC contribution tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.

How California is coded on this district join

California 22nd District (CA-22) here is a USAspending place-of-performance field, not proof that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list CA-22 while later activity occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other California districts belong on those ties even when the CFDA is also 66.468. California 22nd District (CA-22) is a numbered congressional place-of-performance code inside California. Sister California districts remain separate joins even when they reuse CFDA 66.468. California 22nd District (CA-22) is not California 34th (vouchers), 50th (Pell), 11th (NIAID), 32nd (Pell), or 7th (SABG). Those California pairs use other CFDAs.

California federal spending shows how CFDA 66.468 sits beside other programs in the California extract. $871,780,000 is one district-program column, not the state table. This packet does not split California 22nd District (CA-22) by county, city, or census tract. Awards that carry a different CFDA stay on those other ties even if the work sounds related to Drinking Water State Revolving Fund. The district-wide obligation total published here is $3,267,365,148.80; $871,780,000 is the Drinking Water SRF slice of that denominator.

What $871,780,000 is allowed to mean

USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $871,780,000 is that kind of sum for Drinking Water State Revolving Fund inside CA-22 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without rewriting this join into a cash register. Assistance and contract awards can share the same CFDA rollup; this packet does not split them. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $871,780,000 as given.

California’s own budget is a separate ledger. Mixing it with the 7-row Drinking Water SRF cell leaves USAspending.gov. Treat 7 as award records in the aggregate, not unique vendors. 7 is not a count of utilities, miles, or households. Do not annualize without a year field in the packet. Do not per-capita or per-recipient the dollar total; those denominators are unpublished. The implied mean ($124,540,000) is a concentration statistic, not a typical project cost or a posted per-connection figure.

District, program, and state parents

Cite USAspending.gov: Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (CFDA 66.468) obligated $871,780,000 on 7 awards coded to California 22nd District (CA-22). Name Drinking Water State Revolving Fund and California 22nd District (CA-22) together. Keep the obligation word. If California 22nd District or CFDA 66.468 has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not a water-system census, a pipe-mile inventory, or a named-utility roster. 26.7% of $3,267,365,148.80 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score. A 26.7% district share is arithmetic on packet facts, not a ranking of California districts as winners or losers.

Keep Drinking Water State Revolving Fund, California 22nd District (CA-22), $871,780,000, and 7 awards together. All spending ties indexes other pairs. CFDA 66.468 is the 66.468 parent without a CA-22 filter. California federal spending is the California parent. Do not add those parents to this cell. Sharing a district with Drinking Water SRF does not mean campaign donations funded these awards, and it does not convert obligations into outlays. This page reports one USAspending join.

Limits of the CA-22 × 66.468 snapshot

7 awards against an $871.78 million SRF cell is a thin file. Do not invent seven named water systems. A large row count makes a project split tempting; the packet still does not supply one. A small row count makes a named-facility story tempting; the packet still does not name facilities or contractors. The implied mean (about $124,540,000) and the district share (26.7% of $3,267,365,148.80) are ratios of packet facts. Prefer California 22nd District and CFDA 66.468 if the live tables moved.

Do not rank California 22nd District (CA-22) as more Drinking Water SRF-dependent than neighboring districts on the strength of this cell alone. Neighboring geographies have their own 66.468 ties with different dollar totals, or no published 66.468 cell in this harvest. This snapshot holds $871,780,000 and 7 only. All spending ties is the index, not an addend. Obligations are not outlays. Correlation is not causation. A reader who only quotes $871,780,000 without California 22nd District (CA-22) and CFDA 66.468 has dropped a join side.

Questions

How much Drinking Water SRF spending is coded to California 22nd District (CA-22)?

USAspending.gov lists $871,780,000 in Drinking Water State Revolving Fund obligations across 7 awards with place of performance in California 22nd District (CA-22). CFDA 66.468 × CA-22 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not California’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 26.7% of the district’s published total ($3,267,365,148.80). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $124,540,000, a ratio of those two facts only.

Does $871,780,000 include every Drinking Water SRF project in CA-22?

The packet publishes one CFDA rollup. The packet does not split treatment plants from distribution work and does not name systems. $871,780,000 is the combined obligation sum for CFDA 66.468 inside CA-22 coding. This page will not invent a project pie or name contractors. Open CFDA 66.468 and California 22nd District to inspect parent tables. 7 remains an action count, not a count of utilities, miles, or households.

Is $871,780,000 cash already paid in California 22nd District (CA-22)?

No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $871,780,000 as checks already cleared in California 22nd District (CA-22) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 7 awards. Prefer the live district and program hubs if the tables moved.

Do FEC donations fund these Drinking Water SRF awards in CA-22?

No. FEC receipts and USAspending obligations are different datasets. Sharing California geography does not mean donations funded $871,780,000 in California 22nd District (CA-22). This page reports USAspending.gov CFDA 66.468 crossed with place of performance CA-22. It does not report campaign finance. Keep Drinking Water State Revolving Fund and California 22nd District (CA-22) on the same citation.