Drinking Water State Revolving Fund in New Hampshire
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (CFDA 66.468) shows $66,181,000 in USAspending.gov obligations coded to New Hampshire, on 4 awards. Four capitalization rows against a $66.2 million-class DWSRF book is a revolving-fund file, not four utilities. This page is a catalog-program × state join, not an utility, tap, or project census and not an outlay conversion. USAspending.gov is the source table.
Key figures
- CFDA 66.468 × New Hampshire records $66,181,000 in USAspending obligations.
- 4 awards sit under that sum; the mean is about $16,545,250 per record, not a typical unit.
- Matching Drinking Water SRF to New Hampshire is not causation and not an utility, tap, or project census.
- Cite obligations from USAspending.gov, not outlays. FEC donations do not fund this cell.
Four DWSRF awards meeting New Hampshire in the file
Read Drinking Water State Revolving Fund in New Hampshire as the filtered table; this page is the prose overlay for the same cell. Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (CFDA 66.468) with New Hampshire place of performance sums to $66,181,000 on 4 awards. USAspending.gov is the source. The join is not an utility, tap, or project census.
Implied mean obligation is about $16,545,250 ($66,181,000 ÷ 4). That ratio is not a typical water-system loan and not a typical tap replacement. Capitalization grants and related DWSRF awards explain large dollars beside a limited row count. Recipients are unpublished.
Concord did not cause the total by appearing as NH. Matching 66.468 to New Hampshire is not a finding about lead-service lines. Awards tagged to Vermont, Maine, or Massachusetts are other cells. Clean Water SRF listings stay outside $66,181,000 unless they also carry 66.468.
What CFDA 66.468 reports without a utility roster
Official title: DRINKING WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND. That string is catalog language. It does not grade New Hampshire. The nationwide 66.468 page includes other geographies, so it is not this cell.
EPA DWSRF annual reports and state revolving-fund project lists answer questions this packet cannot. Mixing those sources with $66,181,000 would invent a combined total. Capitalization-grant folklore is not stored here.
New Hampshire's statewide stack besides drinking-water SRF
New Hampshire federal spending is the all-program parent. New Hampshire programs lists other catalogs beside 66.468. Quoting $66,181,000 as the state's complete federal footprint would drop every other line.
Place of performance as New Hampshire locates tagged awards; it does not deposit the dollars in Concord's treasury. Manchester is not a named recipient.
SRF obligations are not taps already replaced
$66,181,000 remains an obligation aggregate. Outlays are unpublished. Drawdowns can lag. Cite the commitment field, not a cash story. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 66.468 × NH pair.
Manchester-versus-Nashua stories are not a system split. This packet has no project list. Do not invent a fiscal year. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell.
How to cite the 66.468–New Hampshire pair
Internal links: Drinking Water State Revolving Fund in New Hampshire, CFDA 66.468, New Hampshire federal spending, New Hampshire programs, and All spending ties. Each uses the obligation metric unless a page says otherwise.
Keep Drinking Water State Revolving Fund and New Hampshire together when citing $66,181,000. Later ingests can restate dollars and the 4-award count. This JSON is not a second official ledger.
What four New Hampshire DWSRF rows will not prove
A ties page will not rank New Hampshire against Vermont, Maine, or Massachusetts. Peer Drinking Water State Revolving Fund totals are not in these facts. 4 awards will not be recast as an utility, tap, or project census. Correlation is not causation.
Manchester-versus-Nashua stories are not a system split. This packet has no project list. Keep Drinking Water State Revolving Fund, New Hampshire, $66,181,000, and 4 awards together in every reuse. Place of performance as NH locates the tagged awards; it does not prove every dollar stayed inside New Hampshire after obligation. Concord folklore is not a split of the 4 rows, and Manchester is not a named recipient of $66,181,000.
USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $66,181,000 is the net total supplied in the facts. Treat 4 as a record count in an aggregate, not as 4 finished program years. Award modifications can sit beside base records in the same row count. The mean of about $16,545,250 per record will mislead anyone who treats it as a typical water-system loan and not a typical tap replacement.
Names, unit counts, and per-unit amounts are omitted because they are not in the facts. Read the overlay rows as stored; this page will not invent a New Hampshire budget share. Inspect named lines on Drinking Water State Revolving Fund in New Hampshire rather than inferring an utility, tap, or project census from 4.
Questions
- How much Drinking Water State Revolving Fund is obligated in New Hampshire?
- USAspending.gov records $66,181,000 in CFDA 66.468 obligations across 4 awards coded to New Hampshire. That is a program × state join, not an outlay and not New Hampshire's full federal total. Keep both the program name and New Hampshire in any citation.
- Do 4 awards mean 4 New Hampshire water utilities?
- Award count is a row count. $66,181,000 ÷ 4 is about $16,545,250 per record as a mean, not a typical water-system loan and not a typical tap replacement. Capitalization grants and related DWSRF awards can dominate dollars. This packet does not list recipients. See Drinking Water State Revolving Fund in New Hampshire for the stored table.
- Is this New Hampshire's entire federal water-infrastructure book?
- No. The $66,181,000 and 4 awards are USAspending.gov obligation records for CFDA 66.468 with a New Hampshire geography tag. Clean Water SRF and other EPA infrastructure listings use different CFDAs. Those dollars sit outside this join. Mixing those files with this join would invent a figure the packet does not support.
- Where is the live New Hampshire × 66.468 overlay?
- Drinking Water State Revolving Fund in New Hampshire is the overlay. See New Hampshire federal spending, New Hampshire programs, CFDA 66.468, and All spending ties. Later bulk files override this snapshot. Keep the obligation label on $66,181,000. Do not invent a fiscal year.
USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.