Drinking Water State Revolving Fund in South Carolina

Twenty-six South Carolina DWSRF awards

Read Drinking Water State Revolving Fund in South Carolina as the filtered table; this page is the prose overlay for the same cell. Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (CFDA 66.468) with South Carolina place of performance sums to $244,636,702 on 26 awards. USAspending.gov is the source. The join is not a project, system, or loan census.

Implied mean obligation is about $9,409,103.92 ($244,636,702 ÷ 26). That ratio is not a typical water-system project and not a typical loan year. DWSRF capitalization and related EPA awards explain large dollars beside a limited row count. Recipients are unpublished.

Columbia did not earn the sum by sitting on a SC tag. Matching 66.468 to South Carolina is not a ranking. Awards tagged to North Carolina, Georgia, or Tennessee are other cells. Clean Water SRF, WIIN grants, or other EPA water CFDAs stay outside $244,636,702 unless they also carry 66.468. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. The overlay Drinking Water State Revolving Fund in South Carolina is the live table.

CFDA 66.468 without a water-system roster

Official catalog title: DRINKING WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND. That string is Assistance Listings language. It does not grade South Carolina water systems. The nationwide CFDA 66.468 page includes other states, so it is not this cell.

EPA SRF National Information Management System files and state revolving-fund IUP lists live elsewhere. Mixing those files with this join would invent a per-project dollar figure the packet does not support. Charleston-versus-Greenville system folklore is ordinary speech, not a packet field. Clean Water SRF listings stay outside this cell unless they also carry 66.468.

South Carolina's water stack besides the drinking-water SRF

South Carolina federal spending is the all-program parent. South Carolina programs lists other catalogs beside 66.468. Quoting $244,636,702 as the state's complete federal footprint would drop every other line, including Clean Water SRF, WIIN grants, or other EPA water CFDAs.

Place of performance as South Carolina locates tagged awards; it does not deposit the dollars in Columbia's treasury. Charleston is not a named recipient of $244,636,702. Greenville folklore is not a metro split of the 26 awards.

DWSRF obligations are not pipes already in the ground

$244,636,702 remains an obligation aggregate. Outlays are unpublished. Drawdowns can lag. Cite the commitment field, not a cash story. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 66.468 × SC pair.

Charleston-versus-Greenville folklore is not a split of the 26 awards. Unique recipients are unpublished. Do not invent a fiscal year. Keep the obligation label on $244,636,702. Do not treat a state appropriations chart as this cell unless it uses CFDA 66.468, South Carolina geography, and the obligation metric.

How to cite the 66.468–South Carolina pair

Cite: Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (CFDA 66.468) obligated $244,636,702 on 26 awards coded to South Carolina, per USAspending.gov. Keep both keys. Keep the word obligations. Internal links: Drinking Water State Revolving Fund in South Carolina, CFDA 66.468, South Carolina federal spending, South Carolina programs, and All spending ties.

Later bulk files can move the dollars and the 26-award count. Prefer the overlay Drinking Water State Revolving Fund in South Carolina when the live table and this snapshot diverge. CFDA 66.468, South Carolina federal spending, South Carolina programs, and All spending ties are parent hubs, not competing sums.

What 26 South Carolina DWSRF rows cannot prove

A ties page will not rank South Carolina against North Carolina, Georgia, or Tennessee. Peer Drinking Water State Revolving Fund totals are not in these facts. 26 awards will not be recast as a project, system, or loan census. Correlation is not causation.

Keep Drinking Water State Revolving Fund, South Carolina, $244,636,702, and 26 awards together in every reuse. Place of performance as SC locates the tagged awards; it does not prove every dollar stayed inside South Carolina after obligation. Columbia folklore is not a split of the 26 awards, and Charleston is not a named recipient of $244,636,702.

USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $244,636,702 is the net total supplied in the facts. Treat 26 as a record count in an aggregate, not as 26 finished program years. Award modifications can sit beside base records in the same row count. The mean of about $9,409,103.92 per record will mislead anyone who treats it as a typical water-system project and not a typical loan year.

Questions

How much Drinking Water State Revolving Fund is obligated in South Carolina?

USAspending.gov records $244,636,702 in CFDA 66.468 obligations across 26 awards coded to South Carolina. That is a program × state join, not an outlay and not South Carolina's full federal total. Keep both the program name and South Carolina in any citation.

Do 26 awards mean 26 South Carolina water systems?

Award count is a row count. $244,636,702 ÷ 26 is about $9,409,103.92 per record as a mean, not a typical water-system project and not a typical loan year. DWSRF capitalization and related EPA awards can dominate dollars. This packet does not list recipients. See Drinking Water State Revolving Fund in South Carolina for the stored table.

Is this South Carolina's entire EPA water book?

No. The $244,636,702 and 26 awards are USAspending.gov obligation records for CFDA 66.468 with a South Carolina geography tag. Clean Water SRF, WIIN grants, or other EPA water CFDAs are separate joins. Those dollars sit outside this cell. Mixing those files with this join would invent a figure the packet does not support.

Where is the live South Carolina × 66.468 overlay?

Drinking Water State Revolving Fund in South Carolina is the overlay. See South Carolina federal spending, South Carolina programs, CFDA 66.468, and All spending ties. Later bulk files override this snapshot. Keep the obligation label on $244,636,702. Do not invent a fiscal year.