Skip to main content
← All data ties

Drinking Water State Revolving Fund funding in Vermont

Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (CFDA 66.468) shows $160,818,000 in USAspending.gov obligations with Vermont as place of performance. Eleven awards carry that total. The join is an EPA drinking-water capitalization listing crossed with a state location field, not Vermont’s entire water budget and not a census of pipes. The dollars are commitments, not Treasury outlays.

Key figures

  • CFDA 66.468 in Vermont shows $160,818,000 in USAspending obligations on 11 awards.
  • Eleven awards are capitalization-style rows, not a pipe census.
  • The join is CFDA 66.468 plus Vermont place of performance, not Rhode Island’s DWSRF pair.
  • The total is commitments, not treatment plants already finished.

Vermont x 66.468 is a DWSRF join, not a pipe census

This page pairs CFDA 66.468, DRINKING WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND, with Vermont place of performance. The join is an EPA drinking-water capitalization listing crossed with a state location field, not Vermont’s entire water budget and not a census of pipes. SpendingVault sums tagged obligations: $160,818,000 on 11 awards. The extract does not list systems, miles of pipe, or project names. Treat the pair as a catalog intersection, not a ranking of which state has more need, and not a claim that 11 awards equal 11 water systems or 11 projects.

Other EPA listings — clean-water SRF, emerging-contaminant set-asides, or different 66.xxx titles — sit outside this total unless they also carry 66.468. Mixing those listings into $160,818,000 would invent a combined figure the packet never computed. Correlation between this obligation sum and lead-service-line inventories is not causation. Infrastructure inventories are not in the packet. Place of performance as Vermont locates the tagged awards; it does not deposit $160,818,000 in the state treasury. Burlington-versus-small-town folklore is not a system split in this packet. Emergency Rental Assistance 21.023 in Vermont is a Treasury overlay, not an EPA subset.

11 awards behind $160.8 million

Mean obligation is about $14,619,818.18 if $160,818,000 were divided evenly across 11 lines. That ratio is not a published loan size and not a cost per mile of pipe. Award count is a row count, including possible continuations and modifications. It is not a count of systems, projects, or households.

Eleven lines are scannable on the overlay. Capitalization grants often post as few large rows to a state revolving fund. This page will not invent recipient names. Open Drinking Water State Revolving Fund in Vermont for the stored table. Do not convert 11 into a map of Vermont water systems. The $160,818,000 total remains an obligation rollup on tagged awards. Inspect named lines rather than inferring a pipe census.

SRF obligations are not treatment plants already finished

SRF capitalization awards often obligate as federal grants to the state fund and draw as the fund makes loans or additional subsidization. The $160,818,000 headline is the obligation sum, not a punch-list of projects constructed and not a Treasury outlay total. No fiscal year is attached. A EPA SRF capitalization table dated to a particular year is not automatically this join unless it uses CFDA 66.468, Vermont geography, and the obligation metric.

The listing title is Drinking Water State Revolving Fund. This extract does not split loans from principal forgiveness, and it does not split PFAS treatment from distribution. Those cuts would require award documentation beyond dollars, 11 awards, CFDA 66.468, and Vermont. This page will not invent a share. Clean-water SRF is a different CFDA even when the same state agency administers both funds.

What the Vermont 66.468 table omits

The extract has no systems, miles of pipe, or project names. Facts remain $160,818,000, 11 awards, CFDA 66.468, and Vermont. This page will not invent a ranking against other states’ 66.468 joins. Rhode Island’s 66.468 overlay on this slice is a separate pair; do not add the two totals.

Vermont federal spending and Vermont programs place 66.468 among other listings. CFDA 66.468 is the national catalog line. All spending ties indexes other CFDA x state pairs. Mixing those shelves would invent a share of federal spending the packet never computed. The $160,818,000 figure is the tagged pair only. Campaign-finance filings are a different public-record system; this join does not claim donations funded these obligations.

Where the 66.468 x Vermont overlay lives

Start with Drinking Water State Revolving Fund in Vermont for the 11-award table behind $160,818,000. CFDA 66.468 is the nationwide listing. Vermont federal spending and Vermont programs give state context. All spending ties is the shelf for other program-by-state joins on the same obligation metric. Eleven awards totaling $160,818,000 remain a capitalization-grant file, not a pipe census. System names and pipe miles are not in this packet. The $160,818,000 total is the tagged pair only. USAspending.gov remains the source; SpendingVault republishes the join. If a later extract revises the rollup, this page’s facts will be stale until the packet is rebuilt. Do not annualize $160,818,000: no fiscal year is in the facts.

How to read the Vermont × CFDA 66.468 pair

A ties page exists because two tables meet. One table is the assistance listing (CFDA 66.468). The other is place of performance as Vermont. The headline $160,818,000 is the obligation sum on that intersection. It is not a forecast, not a budget request, and not an outlay. It is also not a claim that CFDA 66.468 caused Vermont’s economy to grow. Correlation between geography and a catalog code is the join — nothing more. Use the internal links to step off this pair. If you need award-level names, open the overlay rather than treating this narrative as a recipient directory.

Questions

How much Drinking Water SRF funding is obligated in Vermont?
USAspending.gov shows $160,818,000 in obligations for CFDA 66.468 with Vermont as place of performance, across 11 awards. The sum is a commitment total on assistance awards, not outlays and not Vermont’s full water-infrastructure budget. Other listings are outside this join unless they also carry 66.468.
Do 11 awards mean 11 Vermont water systems?
No. Award count is a row count of assistance awards and can include continuations. Capitalization grants often post as few large rows to a state fund. It is not a system or pipe census. See the Vermont 66.468 overlay for named lines.
Is Vermont’s DWSRF the same total as Rhode Island’s on this slice?
No. Rhode Island has its own CFDA 66.468 join with a different dollar total. This page is Vermont place of performance only: $160,818,000 across 11 awards. Do not add the two state totals. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
Is $161 million already spent building Vermont water projects?
Not on this metric. Obligations are recorded commitments on assistance awards. Outlays are payments from the Treasury. The $160,818,000 headline is the obligation rollup in SpendingVault’s extract. Construction completions and remaining balances are not published in this packet.

USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.