Skip to main content
← All data ties

Eastern New Mexico Rural Water System federal funding in New Mexico

Eastern New Mexico Rural Water System (CFDA 15.553) shows $292,502,445.04 in USAspending.gov obligations with New Mexico as place of performance. Two awards carry that total. The join is a Interior listing crossed with a state location field, not New Mexico's entire budget and not a census of water customers or a miles-of-pipeline inventory. The dollars are commitments, not Treasury outlays.

Key figures

  • CFDA 15.553 in New Mexico shows $292,502,445.04 in USAspending obligations on two awards.
  • Two awards are project rows, not a water-system census.
  • The join is CFDA 15.553 plus New Mexico place of performance, not all Reclamation water dollars.
  • The total is commitments, not completed pipeline.

New Mexico x 15.553 is an Eastern NM rural-water join, not a customer census

This page pairs CFDA 15.553, EASTERN NEW MEXICO RURAL WATER SYSTEM, with New Mexico place of performance. Eastern New Mexico Rural Water System, in program language, is an Interior Bureau of Reclamation listing for a specific rural water project serving communities in eastern New Mexico. SpendingVault sums tagged obligations: $292,502,445.04 on two awards. The extract does not list miles of pipeline, customers served, or construction phases. Treat the pair as a catalog intersection, not a ranking of which state needs the program more, and not a claim that two awards equal that many local offices.

Other Reclamation or Interior water listings — different rural water project CFDAs, including Mni Wiconi-style projects in other states — sit outside $292,502,445.04 unless they also carry 15.553. Mixing this project CFDA with other Interior water listings would invent a combined rural-water figure the packet never computed. Correlation between this obligation sum and local need statistics is not causation. Those statistics are not in the packet. Place of performance as New Mexico locates the tagged awards; it does not deposit $292,502,445.04 in the state treasury, and it does not prove every dollar stayed inside New Mexico after subawards.

Two awards behind $292,502,445.04

Mean obligation is about $146.25 million if $292,502,445.04 were divided evenly across two lines. That ratio is not a published grant size. Formula-style or project awards often post as a handful of large rows to a lead agency or a small set of recipients. Award count is a row count, including possible continuations. It is not a census of water customers or a miles-of-pipeline inventory.

Two awards are scannable on the overlay. This page will not invent recipient names. Open Eastern New Mexico Rural Water System in New Mexico for the stored table. Do not convert two awards into a map of New Mexico providers. The $292,502,445.04 total remains an obligation rollup on tagged awards. Inspect named lines rather than inferring an inventory.

Rural-water obligations are not pipelines already built

Assistance awards often obligate to a state or recipient and draw as activities proceed. The $292,502,445.04 headline is the obligation sum, not a punch-list of pipe already in the ground and not a Treasury outlay total. No fiscal year is attached. An agency allocation table dated to a particular year is not automatically this join unless it uses CFDA 15.553, New Mexico geography, and the obligation metric.

The listing title is Eastern New Mexico Rural Water System. This extract does not split design from construction, and it does not list which communities are connected. Those cuts would require award documentation beyond the packet facts. This page will not invent an activity-type share. A two-award file at this dollar scale is a project-construction pattern, not a formula grant to every eastern New Mexico town. Do not convert two rows into a map of municipalities.

What the New Mexico 15.553 table omits

The extract has no miles of pipeline, customers served, or construction phases. Facts remain $292,502,445.04, two awards, CFDA 15.553, and New Mexico. This page will not invent a ranking against other states' 15.553 joins. Place-of-performance as a state code locates tagged awards; it does not by itself explain recipient type.

New Mexico federal spending and New Mexico programs place 15.553 among other listings. CFDA 15.553 is the national catalog line. All spending ties indexes other CFDA x state pairs. Mixing those shelves would invent a share of Interior spending the packet never computed. The $292,502,445.04 figure is the tagged pair only.

Where the 15.553 x New Mexico overlay lives

Start with Eastern New Mexico Rural Water System in New Mexico for the table behind $292,502,445.04. CFDA 15.553 is the nationwide listing. New Mexico federal spending and New Mexico programs give state context. All spending ties is the shelf for other program-by-state joins on the same obligation metric. Two awards totaling $292,502,445.04 remain project-construction rows, not a customer census. Miles of pipeline, customers served, or construction phases are not in this packet. Outlays, remaining balances, and fiscal-year splits are omitted because they are not in the facts. Use the overlay for named award lines as USAspending stored them.

Questions

How much Eastern New Mexico Rural Water System funding is obligated in New Mexico?
USAspending.gov shows $292,502,445.04 in obligations for CFDA 15.553 with New Mexico as place of performance, across two awards. The sum is a commitment total on assistance awards, not outlays and not the state's entire federal-spending total. Other Interior listings are outside this join unless they also carry 15.553.
Do 2 awards mean 2 New Mexico water systems received grants?
No. Award count is a row count of assistance awards and can include continuations. It is not a census of water customers or a miles-of-pipeline inventory. The packet does not name recipients. See the New Mexico 15.553 overlay for named lines as USAspending stored them.
Is this New Mexico's entire rural water budget?
No. The join is CFDA 15.553 crossed with New Mexico place of performance. Related programs on other CFDA numbers are not inside $292,502,445.04 unless the award also carries 15.553. Mixing this project CFDA with other Interior water listings would invent a combined rural-water figure the packet never computed.
Is the 15.553 total already spent on New Mexico construction?
Not on this metric. Obligations are recorded commitments on assistance awards. Outlays are payments from the Treasury. The $292,502,445.04 headline is the obligation rollup in SpendingVault's extract. Completed activity and remaining balances are not published in this packet.

USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.