Election Assistance Commission federal obligations in Texas
Election Assistance Commission obligated $60,235,832 in Texas on USAspending.gov, across 3 awards. The pair is awarding-agency 525 × place-of-performance TX. 3 awards against $60,235,832 is a three-award election-assistance file, thin in records and large in dollars. About $20,078,610.67 is the implied mean — $60,235,832 divided by 3, not a typical invoice. Cite USAspending.gov. Obligations are not outlays.
Key figures
- Election Assistance Commission obligated $60,235,832 in Texas across 3 awards (USAspending.gov).
- The pair is awarding-agency 525 × place-of-performance TX.
- Amounts are obligations, not outlays; no fiscal year is in this packet.
- The implied mean near $20,078,610.67 is $60,235,832 divided by 3, not a typical award.
- The join does not name contractors and does not measure polling-place counts, voter-registration totals, or named election systems.
Commission 525 meeting Texas
Election Assistance Commission as awarding agency, Texas as place-of-performance: 3 records summing to $60,235,832. A Election Assistance Commission award coded outside TX is out. An award in Texas from a different awarding agency is out even if the topic sounds related. Texas (TX) excludes Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, and New Mexico. A Texarkana-coded award with an Arkansas place-of-performance tag is a different cell.
3 awards against $60,235,832 is a three-award election-assistance file, thin in records and large in dollars. Unique recipients are unpublished. Do not read 3 as 3 unique polling-place counts, voter-registration totals, or named election systems. Election Assistance Commission in Texas is the both-keys table. Texas federal spending is the all-agency state hub. Election Assistance Commission is the agency book without an TX filter. All spending ties lists other joins.
Polling-place counts, voter-registration totals, and named election systems stay unpublished. Do not invent vendor names. Three rows can still post a large obligation. Correlation is not causation: Texas did not cause $60,235,832 by existing as a large or small place. Population and outcome scores are not packet facts. The join is 525 × TX only.
EAC is not a voter-roll census
$60,235,832 does not measure polling-place counts, voter-registration totals, or named election systems. Those series are not USAspending fields on this aggregate. The cell sums award obligations with awarding-agency code 525 and an TX place-of-performance tag.
Do not treat 3 awards as a census of polling-place counts, voter-registration totals, or named election systems. Parent hubs are supposed to be larger than this pair. If Texas federal spending or Election Assistance Commission matched $60,235,832 and 3, the join would be pointless. Use the overlay when both keys must stay on. Neighboring-state EAC joins are other pairs, not addends.
Texas statewide, not a county clerk list
Place of performance TX is a geography tag on the award, not a metro list and not a commuting zone. Texas (TX) excludes Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, and New Mexico. A Texarkana-coded award with an Oklahoma place-of-performance tag is a different cell. Recipient address can differ from that state tag.
This packet does not split $60,235,832 by city, county, or named facility. 3 awards stay statewide. A county table would be a different extract. Campaign-finance filings do not fund these USAspending obligations.
Three obligations, not three elections
Even a thick or thin file records obligations, not necessarily outlays. $60,235,832 can include amounts that pay on a later schedule. Citing it as cash already sent in Texas confuses two concepts. Deobligations and upward adjustments both move the total.
Texas’s own budget is a different ledger. Mixing it with the 3 awards USAspending file leaves this series. No fiscal year is published in this packet, so this page does not invent one. Keep the obligation label on $60,235,832. Sharing a geography with Election Assistance Commission does not mean FEC donations funded these awards.
Citing EAC in Texas
Cite USAspending.gov: Election Assistance Commission (agency 525) obligated $60,235,832 on 3 awards coded to Texas. Name both sides. Keep “obligations.” Do not relabel the total as polling-place counts, voter-registration totals, or named election systems.
Prefer Election Assistance Commission in Texas if the overlay has refreshed after an ingest. Texas federal spending still includes every other awarding agency tagged to TX. Election Assistance Commission is the 525 parent without the TX filter. All spending ties indexes other pairs. Do not add those parents into $60,235,832.
A usable footnote names Election Assistance Commission, Texas, $60,235,832, and 3. The compact headline $60.2M is that same dollar total rounded. It is not a second extract. The implied mean near $20,078,610.67 is $60,235,832 divided by 3. Means are not medians. USAspending.gov remains the originating system.
A three-row election-assistance cell
Texas’s EAC overlay is 3 awards totaling $60,235,832. Polling-place counts, voter-registration totals, and named election systems stay unpublished. Do not invent vendor names. Three rows can still post a large obligation. Adding parent hubs into $60,235,832 would invent a combined Texas total. Keep 525 × TX as the pair. No fiscal year is published in this packet. Keep the obligation label on $60,235,832. Unique recipients stay unpublished.
Questions
- How much has Election Assistance Commission obligated in Texas?
- USAspending.gov records $60,235,832 across 3 awards with awarding agency 525 and a Texas tag. That is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Texas’s full federal book. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. The join is a catalog intersection, not a budget.
- Does $60.2 million count Texas polling places?
- No. $60,235,832 is an obligation sum on awarding-agency 525 × TX. It does not measure polling-place counts, voter-registration totals, or named election systems. Those series are not fields on this aggregate. The join is a catalog intersection, not an outcome score. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
- Why does this EAC file have only three awards?
- 3 is an award-record count, including possible continuations and modifications. Dividing $60,235,832 by 3 yields about $20,078,610.67 as a mean, not a typical project and not a median. Unique recipients are unpublished. Do not invent contractor names. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
- Where is the live table for Election Assistance Commission in Texas?
- Election Assistance Commission in Texas is the overlay for both keys. Texas federal spending is the all-agency Texas hub. Election Assistance Commission is the agency parent. All spending ties indexes other spending ties. Prefer the overlay when both filters must stay on.
USAspending.gov aggregate of federal obligations by state and awarding agency. Obligations are not outlays.