Electronic Computer Manufacturing in Alabama (NAICS 334111)

Alabama and electronic computer manufacturing as a pair

NAICS 334111 and place-of-performance state AL meet on this tie. $59,962,161.49 is the obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Alabama's statewide federal total, not the nationwide electronic computer manufacturing rollup, and not cash already paid. USAspending labels the industry Electronic Computer Manufacturing; this overlay applies that code only where Alabama is the geography field.

398 is an award-action count. Modifications, delivery orders, and repeat vehicles add rows. Unique vendors are not published in this packet. Reading 398 as plants, offices, or payrolls in Alabama would confuse actions with establishments. The join does not rank Alabama against other states and does not assign a fiscal year; none is in the facts.

Open Alabama federal spending for the state rollup, NAICS 334111 for the industry hub, Alabama industries for other NAICS in the same geography, and All spending ties for other pairs. Do not add those parent pages into $59,962,161.49.

NAICS 334111 in Alabama versus Alaska

USAspending labels NAICS 334111 as Electronic Computer Manufacturing. The packet does not name product lines or primes. Alaska's 334111 overlay on this slice is $52,145,921.46 across 48 awards. Same computer-manufacturing code, two states, opposite action-count texture: Alabama has more rows and a smaller mean.

Alabama ammunition (332993), apparel contractors (315210), and facilities support (561210) share AL geography on this slice and never enter $59,962,161.49. Minnesota electronics repair (811210) is a maintenance code, not this manufacturing code. Award titles on the NAICS 334111 hub are the place to see what a given line bought.

Place of performance in Alabama

Alabama on this join is a geography field, not a Huntsville-only overlay. Place of performance can list AL while later work occurs in Tennessee or Georgia; those states are not inside this total unless also coded AL. The packet does not split counties.

The state hub for Alabama shows how 334111 sits beside other industries with AL place of performance. Awards can list Alabama while headquarters sit elsewhere. Computer-plant folklore is ordinary speech, not extra packet dollars.

398 awards versus Alaska's 48-row overlay

Dividing $59,962,161.49 by 398 yields about $150,659 per award on average. Catalog lines can mint hundreds of rows. Award count 398 is a record count, not a payment count. Alaska's 48-row 334111 mean is larger because the denominator is smaller, not because this packet ranks plants.

An obligation is a legal commitment. $59,962,161.49 is that kind of sum. This packet has no outlay total and no fiscal-year split. Citing the figure as cash already spent in Alabama over-reads the field.

What the computer-Alabama join does not prove

A computer-manufacturing cell is not an employment ranking and not a claim that campaign contributions funded the awards. FEC filings and USAspending awards are different datasets. Keep $59,962,161.49 labeled as NAICS 334111 obligations with Alabama place of performance. Correlation is not causation.

A later ingest can restate $59,962,161.49 or the 398 count without changing the join key of NAICS 334111 and AL. Place of performance remains a geography tag, not proof that work stayed inside Alabama. Keep the obligation word on $59,962,161.49 in every footnote.

How to cite computer manufacturing in Alabama

Cite USAspending.gov, NAICS 334111 (Electronic Computer Manufacturing), Alabama (AL), $59,962,161.49, and 398 awards. Note that the figures are obligations. Point readers to Alabama federal spending, NAICS 334111, Alabama industries, and All spending ties rather than collapsing those pages into this cell. Mean per award stays about $150,659 as a ratio only.

Readers who reuse this snapshot should keep both sides of the join in the same sentence and treat award rows as records rather than unique vendors. This narrative does not invent a fiscal year, a recipient list, or an outlay total that the packet omitted. Alabama's 334111 cell is electronic computer manufacturing. 398 awards and $59,962,161.49 are not other NAICS in the same state and not the same NAICS in another state unless those figures appear above.

Questions

How much has NAICS 334111 obligated in Alabama?

USAspending.gov records $59,962,161.49 in obligations for NAICS 334111 (Electronic Computer Manufacturing) with Alabama place of performance, covering 398 awards. That is an obligation total, not an outlay total. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. Those 398 rows are award actions, not a vendor census, and $59,962,161.49 remains an obligation sum for NAICS 334111 with Alabama place of performance rather than cash already paid.

Is Alabama's 334111 total the same as Alaska's?

No. Alaska's this-slice overlay is $52,145,921.46 across 48 awards. Alabama's extract is $59,962,161.49 across 398 awards. Same NAICS, two states. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. The $59,962,161.49 figure is obligations, not outlays. Keep both join sides in the answer: Electronic Computer Manufacturing and Alabama. Outlays can differ from $59,962,161.49, and unique contractors are unpublished in this packet.

Is 398 the number of computer plants in Alabama?

No. The extract lists 398 awards totaling $59,962,161.49. Unique vendors are not published in this packet. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. The $59,962,161.49 figure is obligations, not outlays. Reading the 398 count as plants or offices in Alabama would confuse actions with establishments. Quote NAICS 334111 and Alabama together when you reuse $59,962,161.49.

Where is the live computer-manufacturing–Alabama table?

Alabama federal spending is the state rollup. NAICS 334111 is the industry hub without a state filter. Alabama industries lists other NAICS in Alabama. All spending ties lists other pairs. The $59,962,161.49 and 398 awards are the 334111×AL join only.