Electronic Computer Manufacturing in Alaska (NAICS 334111)

Alaska and electronic computer manufacturing as a pair

NAICS 334111 and place-of-performance state AK meet on this tie. $52,145,921.46 is the obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Alaska's statewide federal total, not the nationwide electronic computer manufacturing rollup, and not cash already paid. USAspending labels the industry Electronic Computer Manufacturing; this overlay applies that code only where Alaska is the geography field.

48 is an award-action count. Modifications, delivery orders, and repeat vehicles add rows. Unique vendors are not published in this packet. Reading 48 as plants, offices, or payrolls in Alaska would confuse actions with establishments. The join does not rank Alaska against other states and does not assign a fiscal year; none is in the facts.

Open Alaska federal spending for the state rollup, NAICS 334111 for the industry hub, Alaska industries for other NAICS in the same geography, and All spending ties for other pairs. Do not add those parent pages into $52,145,921.46.

NAICS 334111 in Alaska versus Alabama

USAspending labels NAICS 334111 as Electronic Computer Manufacturing. The packet does not name product lines or primes. Alabama's 334111 overlay on this slice is $59,962,161.49 across 398 awards. Same computer-manufacturing code, two states: Alaska has fewer rows and a larger mean.

Alaska temporary help (561320), warehousing (493110), janitorial (561720), and environmental consulting (541620) share AK geography and never enter $52,145,921.46. Minnesota electronics repair (811210) is a maintenance code, not this manufacturing code. Award titles on the NAICS 334111 hub are the place to see what a given line bought.

Place of performance in Alaska

Alaska on this join is a geography field, not a Fairbanks-only overlay. Place of performance can list AK while later work occurs in Washington or elsewhere; those states are not inside this total unless also coded AK. The packet does not split boroughs.

The state hub for Alaska shows how 334111 sits beside other industries with AK place of performance. Awards can list Alaska while headquarters sit elsewhere. Computer-plant folklore is ordinary speech, not extra packet dollars.

48 awards versus Alabama's 398-row overlay

Dividing $52,145,921.46 by 48 yields about $1,086,373 per award on average. Few rows can produce a large mean. Award count 48 is a record count, not a payment count. Alabama's 398-row 334111 mean is smaller because the denominator is larger, not because this packet ranks plants.

An obligation is a legal commitment. $52,145,921.46 is that kind of sum. This packet has no outlay total and no fiscal-year split. Citing the figure as cash already spent in Alaska over-reads the field.

What the computer-Alaska join does not prove

A 48-row computer-manufacturing cell is not an employment ranking and not a claim that campaign contributions funded the awards. FEC filings and USAspending awards are different datasets. Keep $52,145,921.46 labeled as NAICS 334111 obligations with Alaska place of performance. Correlation is not causation.

A later ingest can restate $52,145,921.46 or the 48 count without changing the join key of NAICS 334111 and AK. Place of performance remains a geography tag, not proof that work stayed inside Alaska. Keep the obligation word on $52,145,921.46 in every footnote.

How to cite computer manufacturing in Alaska

Cite USAspending.gov, NAICS 334111 (Electronic Computer Manufacturing), Alaska (AK), $52,145,921.46, and 48 awards. Note that the figures are obligations. Point readers to Alaska federal spending, NAICS 334111, Alaska industries, and All spending ties rather than collapsing those pages into this cell. Mean per award stays about $1,086,373 as a ratio only.

Readers who reuse this snapshot should keep both sides of the join in the same sentence and treat award rows as records rather than unique vendors. This narrative does not invent a fiscal year, a recipient list, or an outlay total that the packet omitted. Alaska's 334111 cell is electronic computer manufacturing. 48 awards and $52,145,921.46 are not other NAICS in the same state and not the same NAICS in another state unless those figures appear above.

Questions

How much has NAICS 334111 obligated in Alaska?

USAspending.gov records $52,145,921.46 in obligations for NAICS 334111 (Electronic Computer Manufacturing) with Alaska place of performance, covering 48 awards. That is an obligation total, not an outlay total. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. Those 48 rows are award actions, not a vendor census, and $52,145,921.46 remains an obligation sum for NAICS 334111 with Alaska place of performance rather than cash already paid.

Is Alaska's 334111 total the same as Alabama's?

No. Alabama's this-slice overlay is $59,962,161.49 across 398 awards. Alaska's extract is $52,145,921.46 across 48 awards. Same NAICS, two states. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. The $52,145,921.46 figure is obligations, not outlays. Keep both join sides in the answer: Electronic Computer Manufacturing and Alaska. Outlays can differ from $52,145,921.46, and unique contractors are unpublished in this packet.

Is 48 the number of computer plants in Alaska?

No. The extract lists 48 awards totaling $52,145,921.46. Unique vendors are not published in this packet. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. The $52,145,921.46 figure is obligations, not outlays. Reading the 48 count as plants or offices in Alaska would confuse actions with establishments. Quote NAICS 334111 and Alaska together when you reuse $52,145,921.46.

Where is the live computer-manufacturing–Alaska table?

Alaska federal spending is the state rollup. NAICS 334111 is the industry hub without a state filter. Alaska industries lists other NAICS in Alaska. All spending ties lists other pairs. The $52,145,921.46 and 48 awards are the 334111×AK join only.