Electronic computer manufacturing in Ohio (NAICS 334111)

How USAspending pairs computers with Ohio

This page intersects one six-digit industry and one state. $96,010,682.42 is the obligation sum where both filters are true. NAICS 334111 is electronic computer manufacturing, not a statewide spending total and not a national 334111 rollup. Those parent tables live on Ohio federal spending and NAICS 334111.

736 awards against $96.0 million is a busy hardware cell rather than a handful of mega-awards. 736 is an award-record count. Modifications can sit beside base awards. The packet does not say how many unique vendors produced the 736 lines. Reading 736 as factories, racks, or clinics in Ohio would confuse actions with establishments.

Ohio industries lists other NAICS codes with OH place of performance. All spending ties indexes other state–industry pairs. Do not sum those indexes into $96,010,682.42. The headline remains $96,010,682.42 on 736 awards for this pair alone.

The overlay exists because two filters are true at once. Quote the industry code and the state together whenever you reuse the headline dollar figure. The packet publishes an obligation sum and an award-action count; it does not publish unique vendors, a median, outlays, or a fiscal year. Parent hubs remain the place to see the statewide mix and the national industry page without the other filter.

NAICS 334111 as the manufacturing side

USAspending labels NAICS 334111 as Electronic Computer Manufacturing. The packet does not name architectures, form factors, or primes. Sharing a state with software or systems-design codes does not merge manufacturing with services. The industry hub for NAICS 334111 does not require Ohio geography; only this overlay applies both filters.

A second electronic-computer join in another state uses the same NAICS and a different dollar total. Do not treat Ohio’s 334111 figure as a synonym for every computer-manufacturing award in the catalog. Unique contractors are unpublished. Dividing $96,010,682.42 by 736 produces about $130,449. That quotient is arithmetic, not a typical Ohio contract. There is no median, no top-award table, and no fiscal-year breakout on this packet.

Ohio geography on a 334111 cell

Ohio place of performance can cover Columbus, Dayton, or a reporting address near a federal installation. The packet has no site split. Inside the OH tag, named cities are not broken out. A named city can sit inside $96,010,682.42 only if its awards carry NAICS 334111 and OH — which this narrative cannot verify.

Place-of-performance geography is not the same as contractor headquarters. A firm based elsewhere can perform in Ohio, and an Ohio address can appear on work done out of state. This join reports the coded pair, not a plant map. Ohio federal spending remains the statewide parent.

Obligations versus outlays for Ohio 334111

USAspending obligations are commitments, not checks that have cleared. $96,010,682.42 can include amounts that will be paid later, cancelled, or modified. The packet does not publish outlays. 736 is not a payment count. Quote NAICS 334111 in Ohio as obligations and leave fiscal-year folklore off the citation — years are unpublished here.

What the computer manufacturing–Ohio pair does not prove

The pair does not prove that Ohio specialized in computer hardware because of federal demand, or the reverse. Unique contractors are unpublished. Campaign-finance tables are a different dataset; donations do not fund these awards. Keep both sides of the join in any headline: NAICS 334111 and Ohio. Place of performance remains a geography tag, not proof that work stayed inside the named state.

How to cite electronic computer manufacturing in Ohio

Cite USAspending.gov, NAICS 334111 (Electronic Computer Manufacturing), Ohio (OH), $96,010,682.42, and 736 awards. Note that the figures are obligations. Point readers to Ohio federal spending, NAICS 334111, Ohio industries, and All spending ties rather than collapsing those pages into this cell. Mean per award stays about $130,449 as a ratio only.

Readers who reuse this snapshot should keep both sides of the join in the same sentence and treat award rows as records rather than unique vendors. This narrative does not invent a fiscal year, a recipient list, or an outlay total that the packet omitted. Place of performance remains a geography tag, not proof that work stayed inside Ohio. Keep the obligation word on $96,010,682.42 in every footnote.

Questions

How much has NAICS 334111 obligated in Ohio?

The pair totals $96,010,682.42 across 736 awards, per USAspending.gov NAICS industry aggregates by place of performance state. Those are obligations for Electronic Computer Manufacturing inside Ohio coding, not outlays and not every federal dollar in Ohio. Source filings stay on USAspending.gov.

How many computer-manufacturing awards sit in Ohio?

736 award records produced $96,010,682.42. Concentration or dispersion is visible only as that count against that sum. About $130,449 per award is $96,010,682.42 divided by 736, not a typical Ohio purchase. The packet does not list unique recipients or a median award.

Is this Ohio supercomputer spending?

The packet does not break 736 awards by platform. $96,010,682.42 is NAICS 334111 obligations with Ohio place of performance. Platform folklore is not a packet field. Quote electronic computer manufacturing and Ohio together. Those figures are obligations, not outlays.

Where are the parent Ohio and NAICS 334111 tables?

Use Ohio federal spending for the statewide industry mix, NAICS 334111 for the national industry page, Ohio industries for the state NAICS index, and All spending ties for other joins. This page quotes only the 334111 × OH cell. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.