Skip to main content
← All data ties

Emergency Rental Assistance Program funding in New Hampshire

Emergency Rental Assistance Program (CFDA 21.023) shows $153,853,515.82 in USAspending.gov obligations with New Hampshire as place of performance. Two awards carry that total. The join is a Treasury Emergency Rental Assistance listing crossed with a state location field, not New Hampshire’s entire housing budget and not a census of tenants. The dollars are commitments, not Treasury outlays.

Key figures

  • CFDA 21.023 in New Hampshire shows $153,853,515.82 in USAspending obligations on 2 awards.
  • Two awards are large grant rows, not a household census.
  • The join is CFDA 21.023 plus New Hampshire place of performance, not Vermont’s ERA pair.
  • The total is commitments, not eviction cases already stopped.

New Hampshire x 21.023 is an ERA join, not a household census

This page pairs CFDA 21.023, EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, with New Hampshire place of performance. The join is a Treasury Emergency Rental Assistance listing crossed with a state location field, not New Hampshire’s entire housing budget and not a census of tenants. SpendingVault sums tagged obligations: $153,853,515.82 on 2 awards. The extract does not list households, landlords, or months of rent. Treat the pair as a catalog intersection, not a ranking of which state has more need, and not a claim that 2 awards equal 2 agencies or 2 households.

Other Treasury or HUD listings — Homeowner Assistance, CDBG, or different rental titles — sit outside this total unless they also carry 21.023. Mixing those listings into $153,853,515.82 would invent a combined figure the packet never computed. Correlation between this obligation sum and eviction filings is not causation. Court figures are not in the packet. Place of performance as New Hampshire locates the tagged awards; it does not deposit $153,853,515.82 in the state treasury. Manchester-versus-Nashua folklore is not a metro split in this packet. DoD science and engineering 12.630 in New Hampshire is a Defense overlay, not a Treasury subset.

2 awards behind $153.9 million

Mean obligation is about $76,926,757.91 if $153,853,515.82 were divided evenly across 2 lines. That ratio is not a published household subsidy and not a typical monthly payment. Award count is a row count, including possible continuations and modifications. It is not a count of households, landlords, or counties.

Two lines are a compact grant file. Large ERA awards to a state or eligible grantee are a common shape. This page will not invent recipient names. Open Emergency Rental Assistance Program in New Hampshire for the stored table. Do not convert 2 into a map of New Hampshire rental units. The $153,853,515.82 total remains an obligation rollup on tagged awards. Inspect named lines rather than inferring a household census.

ERA obligations are not eviction cases already stopped

ERA awards often obligate as large grants to states or localities and draw as rent and utility assistance is paid. The $153,853,515.82 headline is the obligation sum, not a punch-list of households housed and not a Treasury outlay total. No fiscal year is attached. A Treasury ERA allocation table dated to a particular year is not automatically this join unless it uses CFDA 21.023, New Hampshire geography, and the obligation metric.

The listing title is Emergency Rental Assistance Program. This extract does not split rent from utilities, and it does not split ERA1 from ERA2 instruments as filers coded them. Those cuts would require award documentation beyond dollars, 2 awards, CFDA 21.023, and New Hampshire. This page will not invent a share. Two awards are a record count, not proof that only two program offices exist.

What the New Hampshire 21.023 table omits

The extract has no households, landlords, or months of rent. Facts remain $153,853,515.82, 2 awards, CFDA 21.023, and New Hampshire. This page will not invent a ranking against other states’ 21.023 joins. Vermont’s and Wyoming’s 21.023 overlays on this slice are separate pairs; do not add the three totals.

New Hampshire federal spending and New Hampshire programs place 21.023 among other listings. CFDA 21.023 is the national catalog line. All spending ties indexes other CFDA x state pairs. Mixing those shelves would invent a share of federal spending the packet never computed. The $153,853,515.82 figure is the tagged pair only. Campaign-finance filings are a different public-record system; this join does not claim donations funded these obligations.

Where the 21.023 x New Hampshire overlay lives

Start with Emergency Rental Assistance Program in New Hampshire for the 2-award table behind $153,853,515.82. CFDA 21.023 is the nationwide listing. New Hampshire federal spending and New Hampshire programs give state context. All spending ties is the shelf for other program-by-state joins on the same obligation metric. Two awards totaling $153,853,515.82 remain a compact grant file, not a household census. Household counts and landlord names are not in this packet. The $153,853,515.82 total is the tagged pair only. USAspending.gov remains the source; SpendingVault republishes the join. If a later extract revises the rollup, this page’s facts will be stale until the packet is rebuilt. Do not annualize $153,853,515.82: no fiscal year is in the facts.

How to read the New Hampshire × CFDA 21.023 pair

A ties page exists because two tables meet. One table is the assistance listing (CFDA 21.023). The other is place of performance as New Hampshire. The headline $153,853,515.82 is the obligation sum on that intersection. It is not a forecast, not a budget request, and not an outlay. It is also not a claim that CFDA 21.023 caused New Hampshire’s economy to grow. Correlation between geography and a catalog code is the join — nothing more. Use the internal links to step off this pair. If you need award-level names, open the overlay rather than treating this narrative as a recipient directory.

Questions

How much Emergency Rental Assistance funding is obligated in New Hampshire?
USAspending.gov shows $153,853,515.82 in obligations for CFDA 21.023 with New Hampshire as place of performance, across 2 awards. The sum is a commitment total on assistance awards, not outlays and not New Hampshire’s full housing budget. Other listings are outside this join unless they also carry 21.023.
Do 2 awards mean 2 New Hampshire households were helped?
No. Award count is a row count of assistance awards. ERA often posts as few large grants to a state or eligible entities. It is not a household or landlord census. See the New Hampshire 21.023 overlay for named lines as USAspending stored them.
Is this the same ERA total as Vermont on this slice?
No. Vermont has its own CFDA 21.023 join with a different dollar total and award count. This page is New Hampshire place of performance only: $153,853,515.82 across 2 awards. Do not add the two state totals.
Is $154 million already spent on New Hampshire rent checks?
Not on this metric. Obligations are recorded commitments on assistance awards. Outlays are payments from the Treasury. The $153,853,515.82 headline is the obligation rollup in SpendingVault’s extract. Household counts and remaining balances are not published in this packet.

USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.