Engineering services federal obligations in Alabama (NAICS 541330)

NAICS 541330 dollars tagged to Alabama

NAICS 541330 is engineering services, not missile manufacturing and not computer systems design. Hawaii, Alaska, and Oklahoma 541330 are different state joins. The dollar figure $392,816,592.85 applies only where the industry code and the AL geography are both present. Alabama federal spending is larger because it includes other NAICS. NAICS 541330 is larger because it includes other states. This tie is the intersection.

1,174 actions produced the Alabama book. 1,174 awards against $392.8 million is a mid-thickness professional-services book rather than a three-line concentrated cell. Award rows are not the same as establishments in the Economic Census. A single vendor can hold several of the 1,174 records. The packet does not identify vendors.

Readers comparing codes should open Alabama industries rather than inferring rank from this one cell. All spending ties collects other intersections. NAICS 541330 without the Alabama filter is a different total. None of those pages should be added into $392,816,592.85.

Engineering advice, not missile manufacturing

Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing (336414) and architectural services are different pages. Residual or neighboring codes are easy to merge in speech and wrong to merge in this table. NAICS 541330 is engineering services, not missile manufacturing and not computer systems design. Hawaii, Alaska, and Oklahoma 541330 are different state joins. $392,816,592.85 stays inside 541330 × AL only.

The implied mean of about $334,597 is $392,816,592.85 / 1,174. Redstone folklore is easy to paste onto an Alabama engineering code. This packet does not name projects or primes. There is no distribution in the packet: no p50, no largest award, no fiscal year. A high mean can be one vehicle; a low mean can be many delivery orders. This extract cannot tell those stories apart.

Alabama geography on a 541330 cell

Alabama place of performance can cover Huntsville, Birmingham, the Gulf, or a reporting address. The packet has no city split. Huntsville, Mobile, or a named A-E campus are ordinary place names, not columns. The only geography key is AL. Splitting $392,816,592.85 across those names would be invention.

USAspending place of performance is a reporting field. It can diverge from where parts were made, where patients were seen, or where a ship was docked. This page repeats the coded Alabama tag. It does not audit the field. Alabama federal spending uses the same geography convention across industries.

Obligations, not outlays, on Alabama 541330

Obligations are not outlays. $392,816,592.85 is the commitment aggregate for this pair. Later modifications can raise or lower what is eventually paid. The packet does not report outlays or a fiscal-year series. Quote 1,174 as award records. Do not call $392,816,592.85 ‘spent in Alabama this year’ — no year is published here.

What the engineering–Alabama pair does not prove

Redstone folklore is easy to paste onto an Alabama engineering code. This packet does not name projects or primes. Federal awards in one NAICS do not explain Alabama employment, and itemized campaign gifts do not pay USAspending obligations. Different statutes, different tables. Cite NAICS 541330 and Alabama together so the join stays visible. Alabama industries and All spending ties are the related indexes.

How to cite NAICS 541330 in Alabama

Footnote form: USAspending.gov; NAICS 541330 Engineering Services; place of performance Alabama; obligations $392,816,592.85; awards 1,174; mean about $334,597 (ratio only). Link Alabama federal spending and NAICS 541330 as parents. Do not convert $392,816,592.85 to per-capita figures; population is not a packet fact. Readers who reuse Engineering services in Alabama | 541330 should keep both sides of the join in the same sentence, cite USAspending.gov as the source, and treat award rows as records rather than unique vendors. The live hubs linked from this page can refresh the snapshot; this narrative does not invent a fiscal year, a recipient list, or an outlay total that the packet omitted. Place of performance remains a geography tag, not proof that work stayed inside the named state.

Questions

How much has NAICS 541330 obligated in Alabama?

$392,816,592.85 is the USAspending obligation total for NAICS 541330 with Alabama place of performance, on 1,174 awards. It is not an outlay and not Alabama’s full federal book. The industry title on the award file is Engineering Services. Filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Are 1,174 awards 1,174 Alabama engineering firms?

1,174 records hold $392,816,592.85. Whether that is concentrated or scattered is not something the packet proves beyond the two facts. About $334,597 per award is only the quotient. Unique recipients, medians, and fiscal years are unpublished.

Is this Alabama’s missile-manufacturing total?

No. $392,816,592.85 is NAICS 541330 obligations with Alabama place of performance on 1,174 awards. Missile manufacturing uses a different code. Unique recipients are unpublished. Quote engineering services and Alabama together and keep the obligation label. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Where are the parent Alabama and NAICS 541330 tables?

Alabama federal spending, NAICS 541330, Alabama industries, and All spending ties are the four related tables listed on this page. Use them for parent or sibling views. This join stays 541330 in AL at $392,816,592.85. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.