Environmental consulting in Arizona (NAICS 541620)

Reading the environmental consulting–Arizona cell

NAICS 541620 and place-of-performance state AZ meet here. $103,128,142.48 is the obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not the nationwide consulting total, not Arizona’s full spending rollup, and not cash already paid. USAspending labels the industry Environmental Consulting Services; this overlay applies that code only where Arizona is the geography field.

470 is an award-action count. Modifications, delivery orders, and repeat vehicles add rows. Unique vendors are not published in this packet. Dividing $103,128,142.48 by 470 yields about $219,421 per award on average. The join does not rank Arizona against other states and does not assign a fiscal year; none is in the facts.

Open Arizona federal spending for the state rollup, NAICS 541620 for the industry hub, Arizona industries for other NAICS in the same geography, and All spending ties for other pairs.

The overlay exists because two filters are true at once. Quote the industry code and the state together whenever you reuse the headline dollar figure. The packet publishes an obligation sum and an award-action count; it does not publish unique vendors, a median, outlays, or a fiscal year. Parent hubs remain the place to see the statewide mix and the national industry page without the other filter.

NAICS 541620 as the consulting side

USAspending labels NAICS 541620 as Environmental Consulting Services. The packet does not name studies, permits, or primes. Sharing a state with remediation or engineering codes does not merge consulting with cleanup construction. The industry hub for NAICS 541620 does not require Arizona geography; only this overlay applies both filters.

A second environmental-consulting join in another state uses the same NAICS and a different dollar total. Do not treat Arizona’s 541620 figure as a synonym for every environmental-consulting award in the catalog. Award titles on the NAICS 541620 page are the place to see what a given line bought. Keep the six-digit label when you cite the Arizona cell.

Place of performance in Arizona

Arizona on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to Arizona residents. Arizona POP is statewide, not a Phoenix-only or Tucson-only overlay. Place of performance can list AZ while later work occurs in New Mexico or California; those states are not inside this total unless also coded AZ.

The state hub for Arizona shows how NAICS 541620 sits beside other industries in the same geography. This packet does not split metros, counties, or congressional districts. Contractor headquarters can differ from the place-of-performance tag.

Award count, mean, and obligations

470 awards against $103,128,142.48 produces a mean of about $219,421. That mean is still only a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical invoice. Award count 470 is a record count, not a payment count and not a unique-contractor census.

An obligation is a legal commitment. $103,128,142.48 is that kind of sum. Outlays can lag. This packet has no outlay total and no fiscal-year split. Citing $103,128,142.48 as cash already spent in Arizona over-reads the field.

What this pair does not prove

A mid-count consulting cell is not proof of a single prime and not proof that Arizona specialized in environmental studies because of federal demand. Keep $103,128,142.48 labeled as NAICS 541620 obligations with Arizona place of performance. Campaign contributions and USAspending awards are different datasets; this page does not claim donations fund these obligations. Correlation is not causation.

How to cite environmental consulting in Arizona

Cite USAspending.gov, NAICS 541620 (Environmental Consulting Services), Arizona (AZ), $103,128,142.48, and 470 awards. Note that the figures are obligations. Point readers to Arizona federal spending, NAICS 541620, Arizona industries, and All spending ties rather than collapsing those pages into this cell. Mean per award stays about $219,421 as a ratio only.

Readers who reuse this snapshot should keep both sides of the join in the same sentence and treat award rows as records rather than unique vendors. This narrative does not invent a fiscal year, a recipient list, or an outlay total that the packet omitted. Place of performance remains a geography tag, not proof that work stayed inside Arizona. Keep the obligation word on $103,128,142.48 in every footnote.

Questions

How much has NAICS 541620 obligated in Arizona?

USAspending.gov records $103,128,142.48 in obligations for NAICS 541620 (Environmental Consulting Services) with Arizona place of performance, covering 470 awards. That is an obligation total, not an outlay total, and not the nationwide consulting figure. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Does $103.1M mean the Treasury spent that much in Arizona?

No. The figure is obligations on awards tagged to NAICS 541620 and Arizona place of performance. Outlays can differ. Place of performance is a geography field, not proof that every dollar was disbursed to Arizona vendors or residents. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

How many environmental-consulting awards sit in Arizona?

The extract lists 470 awards totaling $103,128,142.48 for environmental consulting (541620) with Arizona place of performance. About $219,421 per award is a ratio of those two facts, not a typical invoice. Unique vendors are not published in this packet. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Where is the live environmental consulting–Arizona table?

Arizona federal spending is the state rollup. NAICS 541620 is the industry hub without a state filter. Arizona industries lists other NAICS in Arizona. All spending ties lists other pairs. The $103,128,142.48 and 470 awards on this page are the 541620×AZ join only. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.