Skip to main content
← All data ties

Environmental Protection Agency federal obligations in Alaska

Environmental Protection Agency shows $567,800,935.21 in USAspending.gov obligations coded to Alaska, across 385 awards. Awarding-agency 068 and Alaska (AK) are the pair. 385 awards against $567,800,935.21 is a 385-award environmental file, thicker than West Virginia EPA on rows, still not a site ledger. The implied mean is about $1,474,807.62 per award — a quotient of two packet facts, not a typical invoice. USAspending.gov is the source. Amounts are obligations, not outlays.

Key figures

  • Environmental Protection Agency obligated $567,800,935.21 in Alaska across 385 awards (USAspending.gov).
  • The pair is awarding-agency 068 × place-of-performance AK.
  • Amounts are obligations, not outlays; no fiscal year is in this packet.
  • The implied mean near $1,474,807.62 is $567,800,935.21 divided by 385, not a typical award.
  • The join does not name contractors and does not measure Superfund site counts, inspection tallies, or named facilities.

Agency 068 overlapping Alaska

Environmental Protection Agency as awarding agency, Alaska as place-of-performance: 385 records summing to $567,800,935.21. A Environmental Protection Agency award coded outside AK is out. An award in Alaska from a different awarding agency is out even if the topic sounds related. Alaska (AK) excludes Washington and Hawaii, stored as other state keys, not Alaska add-ons. An Anchorage-coded award with a Washington place-of-performance tag is a different cell.

385 awards against $567,800,935.21 is a 385-award environmental file, thicker than West Virginia EPA on rows, still not a site ledger. Unique recipients are unpublished. Do not read 385 as 385 unique Superfund site counts, inspection tallies, or named facilities. Environmental Protection Agency in Alaska is the both-keys table. Alaska federal spending is the all-agency state hub. Environmental Protection Agency is the agency book without an AK filter. All spending ties lists other joins.

Fairbanks and Juneau are unpublished splits. Village and borough folklore is not a packet field. Do not invent named facilities. Unique recipients stay unpublished. Correlation is not causation: Alaska did not cause $567,800,935.21 by existing as a large or small place. Population and outcome scores are not packet facts. The join is 068 × AK only.

Cleanup folklore is not a village census

$567,800,935.21 does not measure Superfund site counts, inspection tallies, or named facilities. Those series are not USAspending fields on this aggregate. The cell sums award obligations with awarding-agency code 068 and an AK place-of-performance tag.

Do not treat 385 awards as a census of Superfund site counts, inspection tallies, or named facilities. Parent hubs are supposed to be larger than this pair. If Alaska federal spending or Environmental Protection Agency matched $567,800,935.21 and 385, the join would be pointless. Use the overlay when both keys must stay on. Neighboring-state EPA joins are other pairs, not addends.

Alaska statewide, not an Anchorage-only map

Place of performance AK is a geography tag on the award, not a metro list and not a commuting zone. Alaska (AK) excludes Washington and Hawaii, stored as other state keys, not Alaska add-ons. An Anchorage-coded award with a Washington place-of-performance tag is a different cell. Recipient address can differ from that state tag.

This packet does not split $567,800,935.21 by city, county, or named facility. 385 awards stay statewide. A county table would be a different extract. Campaign-finance filings do not fund these USAspending obligations.

Three hundred eighty-five EPA obligations

Even a thick or thin file records obligations, not necessarily outlays. $567,800,935.21 can include amounts that pay on a later schedule. Citing it as cash already sent in Alaska confuses two concepts. Deobligations and upward adjustments both move the total.

Alaska’s own budget is a different ledger. Mixing it with the 385 awards USAspending file leaves this series. No fiscal year is published in this packet, so this page does not invent one. Keep the obligation label on $567,800,935.21. Sharing a geography with Environmental Protection Agency does not mean FEC donations funded these awards.

Citing EPA in Alaska

Cite USAspending.gov: Environmental Protection Agency (agency 068) obligated $567,800,935.21 on 385 awards coded to Alaska. Name both sides. Keep “obligations.” Do not relabel the total as Superfund site counts, inspection tallies, or named facilities.

Prefer Environmental Protection Agency in Alaska if the overlay has refreshed after an ingest. Alaska federal spending still includes every other awarding agency tagged to AK. Environmental Protection Agency is the 068 parent without the AK filter. All spending ties indexes other pairs. Do not add those parents into $567,800,935.21.

A usable footnote names Environmental Protection Agency, Alaska, $567,800,935.21, and 385. The compact headline $567.8M is that same dollar total rounded. It is not a second extract. The implied mean near $1,474,807.62 is $567,800,935.21 divided by 385. Means are not medians. USAspending.gov remains the originating system.

Questions

How much has Environmental Protection Agency obligated in Alaska?
USAspending.gov records $567,800,935.21 across 385 awards with awarding agency 068 and a Alaska tag. That is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Alaska’s full federal book. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. The join is a catalog intersection, not a budget.
Does $567 million measure Superfund sites in Alaska?
No. $567,800,935.21 is an obligation sum on awarding-agency 068 × AK. It does not measure Superfund site counts, inspection tallies, or named facilities. Those series are not fields on this aggregate. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
Why does this EPA file have 385 awards?
385 is an award-record count, including possible continuations and modifications. Dividing $567,800,935.21 by 385 yields about $1,474,807.62 as a mean, not a typical project. Unique recipients are unpublished. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
Where is the live table for Environmental Protection Agency in Alaska?
Environmental Protection Agency in Alaska is the overlay for both keys. Alaska federal spending is the all-agency Alaska hub. Environmental Protection Agency is the agency parent. All spending ties indexes other spending ties. Prefer the overlay when both filters must stay on.

USAspending.gov aggregate of federal obligations by state and awarding agency. Obligations are not outlays.