EPA federal obligations in Idaho

A join, not a Idaho EPA scorecard

Quote the join in one breath: Environmental Protection Agency in Idaho, $323,390,267.58, 123 awards, USAspending.gov, obligations not outlays. Skip any sentence that needs a contractor name, a program catalog, or a fiscal year — those facts are not in the packet.

The 123 figure is not a count of unique facilities or grantees and is not a count of distinct EPA programs. Modifications can add rows without adding new vendors. That is another reason the mean of about $2,629,189.17 is not a typical cleanup or water-quality award.

Open Environmental Protection Agency in Idaho for the filtered table, Idaho federal spending for the next hub, Environmental Protection Agency for the remaining hub, and All spending ties for other pairs.

No typical EPA award is published here

Air-quality, water, and cleanup-program folklore may explain why a searcher landed here. It does not add dollars, awards, or unique facilities or grantees to the extract. Keep the published pair at $323,390,267.58 and 123.

Repeat the filters before repeating the dollars: Environmental Protection Agency (068) and Idaho (ID). Then $323,390,267.58. Then 123. Then USAspending.gov.

Landmarks are not subtotals

All spending ties is an index of joins, not a hidden total that already includes $323,390,267.58. Environmental Protection Agency in Idaho remains the place to verify the live rows.

Snake river, panhandle, and mining-district folklore is the same kind of reader path as air-quality, water, and cleanup-program folklore: useful for search, unused as math.

Source note, copied without extra years

Because no fiscal year is in `facts`, this file does not stamp FY on $323,390,267.58. Readers who need a year filter should use the overlay or a different extract that actually publishes a year.

Nothing in the packet converts $323,390,267.58 into local economic impact, jobs, or tax-return outcomes. Those claims would need other datasets.

Separate systems, same map words

USAspending.gov and FEC.gov can share place names without sharing dollars. Idaho in a contribution file is not a funding source for $323,390,267.58.

Keep FEC language off captions that reuse $323,390,267.58. The unit and the source both belong to USAspending.gov.

Both join sides, then the number, then the source

Keep $2,629,189.17 in the same sentence as the word mean, or omit it. Detached, it reads like a typical cleanup or water-quality award.

All spending ties is an index of joins, not a hidden total that already includes $323,390,267.58. Environmental Protection Agency in Idaho remains the place to verify the live rows. Place-of-performance Idaho is statewide; it does not split Boise, Coeur d'Alene, and Idaho Falls. Neighbor-coded activity in Washington, Oregon, Montana, Wyoming, Nevada, or Utah stays out even if mail is handled in Boise. Correlation is not causation. Air-quality, water, and cleanup-program folklore can be a legitimate research question on another page. Here it is labeled folklore because the packet has no NAICS, CFDA, or program column. Snake river, panhandle, and mining-district folklore is the same kind of reader path: useful for search, unused as math. Agency 068 on a different state's overlay is a sibling join, not a remainder that must add to a national EPA budget on this page. Idaho's $323,390,267.58 cell stands alone. Do not subtract it from Environmental Protection Agency and call the difference 'Idaho versus everywhere else' without a published national total in this packet — there is none. Environmental Protection Agency is the awarding-agency label stored on the Idaho overlay; the numeric key is 068. Readers who only remember the short name EPA still need both the state tag and the agency tag before quoting $323,390,267.58. The 123 figure is not a count of unique facilities or grantees and is not a count of distinct EPA programs. Modifications can add rows without adding new vendors. That is another reason the mean of about $2,629,189.17 is not a typical cleanup or water-quality award. Mining-district folklore is unused as math. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. This file copies overlayTarget /states/id/agencies/068/ and canonicalPath /ties/environmental-protection-agency-in-idaho/ from the packet. It does not add a fiscal year, a contractor, or an FEC dollar. If the live overlay later disagrees with $323,390,267.58 or 123, trust the table and treat this prose as dated to the extract. Until then, the reusable facts are $323,390,267.58, 123 awards, agency 068, Environmental Protection Agency, Idaho (ID), and the obligation unit.

Questions

What is the EPA obligation total for Idaho?

USAspending.gov records $323,390,267.58 in obligations for awarding agency 068 (Environmental Protection Agency) with Idaho place of performance, covering 123 awards. That is an obligation total, not an outlay total, and not Environmental Protection Agency's nationwide budget. The pair is a join, not a ranking.

Are unique EPA grantees listed for Idaho?

The extract lists 123 award actions totaling $323,390,267.58. Average obligation per award is about $2,629,189.17, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical cleanup or water-quality award. Unique facilities or grantees are not published here. Original filings remain on the source sites.

Does this Idaho EPA cell include Washington-coded awards?

No. $323,390,267.58 and 123 awards are statewide Idaho place of performance. This packet does not split Boise, Coeur d'Alene, and Idaho Falls. Awards coded to Washington, Oregon, Montana, Wyoming, Nevada, or Utah are outside this cell even if mail is handled in Boise. The geography key remains ID.

How do I open the Idaho overlay for EPA agency 068?

Environmental Protection Agency in Idaho is the overlay. Idaho federal spending shows all agencies in the state. Environmental Protection Agency shows agency 068 without a state filter. All spending ties lists other pairs. Original filings remain on the source sites.