Environmental Protection Agency federal obligations in New Mexico

Agency 068 meeting New Mexico

Environmental Protection Agency as awarding agency, New Mexico as place-of-performance: 189 awards summing to $470,630,678.53. A Environmental Protection Agency award coded outside NM is out. An award in New Mexico from a different awarding agency is out even if the topic sounds related. New Mexico (NM) excludes Texas, Oklahoma, Colorado, Utah, and Arizona. An Albuquerque-coded award with a Texas place-of-performance tag is a different cell.

189 awards against $470,630,678.53 is a 189-award environmental file, thicker than North Dakota’s EPA join. Unique recipients are unpublished. Do not read 189 as 189 unique Superfund site counts, mine inventories, or named facilities. Environmental Protection Agency in New Mexico is the both-keys table. New Mexico federal spending is the all-agency state hub. Environmental Protection Agency is the agency book without a NM filter. All spending ties lists other joins.

Named basins and labs are unpublished. Do not invent contractors. North Dakota and Oregon EPA pages in this slice are other state keys on agency 068. Correlation is not causation: New Mexico did not cause $470,630,678.53 by existing as a large or small place. Population and outcome scores are not packet facts. The join is 068 × NM only.

Cleanup folklore is unpublished

$470,630,678.53 does not measure Superfund site counts, mine inventories, or named facilities. Those series are not USAspending fields on this aggregate. The cell sums award obligations with awarding-agency code 068 and an NM place-of-performance tag.

Do not treat 189 awards as a census of Superfund site counts, mine inventories, or named facilities. Parent hubs are supposed to be larger than this pair. If New Mexico federal spending or Environmental Protection Agency matched $470,630,678.53 and 189, the join would be pointless. Use the overlay when both keys must stay on. Neighboring-state EPA joins are other pairs, not addends.

New Mexico, not an Albuquerque-only map

Place of performance NM is a geography tag on the award, not a metro list and not a commuting zone. New Mexico (NM) excludes Texas, Oklahoma, Colorado, Utah, and Arizona. An Albuquerque-coded award with a Texas place-of-performance tag is a different cell. Recipient address can differ from that state tag.

This packet does not split $470,630,678.53 by city, county, or named facility. 189 awards stay statewide. A county table would be a different extract. Campaign-finance filings do not fund these USAspending obligations.

One hundred eighty-nine obligations

Even a thick or thin file records obligations, not necessarily outlays. $470,630,678.53 can include amounts that pay on a later schedule. Citing it as cash already sent in New Mexico confuses two concepts. Deobligations and upward adjustments both move the total.

New Mexico’s own budget is a different ledger. Mixing it with the 189 awards USAspending file leaves this series. No fiscal year is published in this packet, so this page does not invent one. Keep the obligation label on $470,630,678.53.

Citing EPA in New Mexico

Cite USAspending.gov: Environmental Protection Agency (agency 068) obligated $470,630,678.53 on 189 awards coded to New Mexico. Name both sides. Keep “obligations.” Do not relabel the total as Superfund site counts, mine inventories, or named facilities.

Prefer Environmental Protection Agency in New Mexico if the overlay has refreshed after an ingest. New Mexico federal spending still includes every other awarding agency tagged to NM. Environmental Protection Agency is the 068 parent without the NM filter. All spending ties indexes other pairs. Do not add those parents into $470,630,678.53.

A usable footnote names Environmental Protection Agency, New Mexico, $470,630,678.53, and 189. The compact headline $470.6M is that same dollar total rounded. It is not a second extract. The implied mean near $2,490,109.41 is $470,630,678.53 divided by 189. Means are not medians. USAspending.gov remains the originating system.

Questions

How much has Environmental Protection Agency obligated in New Mexico?

USAspending.gov records $470,630,678.53 across 189 awards with awarding agency 068 and a New Mexico tag. That is an obligation join, not an outlay and not New Mexico’s full federal book. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Does $470.6 million measure New Mexico mine cleanup?

No. $470,630,678.53 is an obligation sum on awarding-agency 068 × NM. It does not measure Superfund site counts, mine inventories, or named facilities. Those series are not fields on this aggregate. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Why does this EPA file have 189 awards?

189 is an award-record count, including possible continuations and modifications. Dividing $470,630,678.53 by 189 yields about $2,490,109.41 as a mean, not a typical project. Unique recipients are unpublished. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Where is the live table for Environmental Protection Agency in New Mexico?

Environmental Protection Agency in New Mexico is the overlay for both keys. New Mexico federal spending is the all-agency New Mexico hub. Environmental Protection Agency is the agency parent. All spending ties indexes other spending ties. Prefer the overlay when both filters must stay on.