Skip to main content
← All data ties

EPA federal obligations in Utah

USAspending.gov records $341,008,873.35 obligated by Environmental Protection Agency where the place of performance is Utah. The awarding-agency code is 068, and the award count is 112. About $3,044,722.08 per award is $341,008,873.35 divided by 112 — not a typical cleanup or water-quality award.

Key figures

  • USAspending cell: EPA × Utah = $341,008,873.35.
  • 112 records, about $3,044,722.08 each as a mean.
  • Outlays and fiscal-year splits are unpublished here.
  • Wasatch Front folklore is not a dollar field.
  • No contractor names in this packet; geography is statewide Utah.

USAspending's Environmental Protection Agency × Utah aggregate

The relationship is mechanical. USAspending.gov stores an awarding-agency code and a place-of-performance state. This slug keeps rows where those two keys are 068 and UT. $341,008,873.35 is the obligation sum of that intersection. It is not a verdict on Utah policy and not a nationwide EPA budget.

A modest award list of 112 actions can concentrate dollars in a few instruments or spread them across many modifications. This extract does not say which pattern holds. It publishes $341,008,873.35 and 112 together, without a type split.

Open Environmental Protection Agency in Utah for the filtered table, Utah federal spending for the next hub, Environmental Protection Agency for the remaining hub, and All spending ties for other pairs.

Why a modest award list still hides mixed instruments

$3,044,722.08 is a ratio of two packet facts. It is not a median, not a mode, and not a typical cleanup or water-quality award. A later ingest can move $341,008,873.35 or 112; until then, the published pair is fixed. Wasatch front and great basin folklore does not change the ratio.

Agency 068 on a different state's overlay is a sibling join, not a remainder that must add to a national EPA budget on this page. Utah's $341,008,873.35 cell stands alone.

Statewide UT, not Salt Lake City alone

A UT place-of-performance tag is not a promise that every dollar stayed inside Salt Lake City. Work can be planned in Utah and performed partly in Nevada, Idaho, Wyoming, or Colorado. Those neighbor-coded awards are out of this cell.

Wasatch front and great basin folklore can be a legitimate research question on another page. Here it is labeled folklore because the packet has no county, city, or congressional-district column.

Obligation unit, not outlay unit

Keep the obligation word in every reuse of $341,008,873.35. Utah federal spending and Environmental Protection Agency use the same unit on their own filters. Mixing units across hubs produces a false statewide cash story.

If two pages disagree, prefer the overlay table over remembered round numbers. This prose is a reading of one extract, not a second dataset.

Campaign-finance tables stay off this page

Do not claim that donations paid for $341,008,873.35 in Utah. The source is USAspending.gov award aggregates. FEC tables are out of scope for this join.

No contractor roster belongs in this narrative. The facts list state, agency code, agency name, total obligations, and award count. That is the whole numeric set.

How to cite the EPA–Utah pair

Follow Environmental Protection Agency in Utah for the overlay, Utah federal spending for statewide context, Environmental Protection Agency for the agency without Utah, and All spending ties for sibling joins.

All spending ties is an index of joins, not a hidden total that already includes $341,008,873.35. Environmental Protection Agency in Utah remains the place to verify the live rows. Place-of-performance Utah is statewide; it does not split Salt Lake City, Provo, and Ogden. Neighbor-coded activity in Nevada, Idaho, Wyoming, or Colorado stays out even if mail is handled in Salt Lake City. Correlation is not causation. Air-quality, water, and cleanup-program folklore can be a legitimate research question on another page. Here it is labeled folklore because the packet has no NAICS, CFDA, or program column. Wasatch front and great basin folklore is the same kind of reader path: useful for search, unused as math. Agency 068 on a different state's overlay is a sibling join, not a remainder that must add to a national EPA budget on this page. Utah's $341,008,873.35 cell stands alone. Do not subtract it from Environmental Protection Agency and call the difference 'Utah versus everywhere else' without a published national total in this packet — there is none. Environmental Protection Agency is the awarding-agency label stored on the Utah overlay; the numeric key is 068. Readers who only remember the short name EPA still need both the state tag and the agency tag before quoting $341,008,873.35. The 112 figure is not a count of unique facilities or grantees and is not a count of distinct EPA programs. Modifications can add rows without adding new vendors. That is another reason the mean of about $3,044,722.08 is not a typical cleanup or water-quality award. Wasatch Front folklore is not a dollar field. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. This file copies overlayTarget /states/ut/agencies/068/ and canonicalPath /ties/environmental-protection-agency-in-utah/ from the packet. It does not add a fiscal year, a contractor, or an FEC dollar. If the live overlay later disagrees with $341,008,873.35 or 112, trust the table and treat this prose as dated to the extract. Until then, the reusable facts are $341,008,873.35, 112 awards, agency 068, Environmental Protection Agency, Utah (UT), and the obligation unit.

Questions

What is the EPA obligation total for Utah?
USAspending.gov records $341,008,873.35 in obligations for awarding agency 068 (Environmental Protection Agency) with Utah place of performance, covering 112 awards. That is an obligation total, not an outlay total, and not Environmental Protection Agency's nationwide budget. The pair is a join, not a ranking.
Are unique EPA grantees listed for Utah?
The extract lists 112 award actions totaling $341,008,873.35. Average obligation per award is about $3,044,722.08, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical cleanup or water-quality award. Unique facilities or grantees are not published here. Original filings remain on the source sites.
Are Nevada or Colorado EPA awards included?
No. $341,008,873.35 and 112 awards are statewide Utah place of performance. This packet does not split Salt Lake City, Provo, and Ogden. Awards coded to Nevada, Idaho, Wyoming, or Colorado are outside this cell even if mail is handled in Salt Lake City. The geography key remains UT.
How do I open the Utah overlay for EPA agency 068?
Environmental Protection Agency in Utah is the overlay. Utah federal spending shows all agencies in the state. Environmental Protection Agency shows agency 068 without a state filter. All spending ties lists other pairs. Original filings remain on the source sites.

USAspending.gov aggregate of federal obligations by state and awarding agency. Obligations are not outlays.