Environmental Protection Agency federal obligations in Vermont

Agency 068 meeting Vermont

Environmental Protection Agency as awarding agency, Vermont as place-of-performance: 102 records summing to $395,197,132.65. A Environmental Protection Agency award coded outside VT is out. An award in Vermont from a different awarding agency is out even if the topic sounds related. Vermont (VT) excludes New Hampshire, New York, and Massachusetts. A Burlington-coded award with a New York place-of-performance tag is a different cell.

102 awards against $395,197,132.65 is a 102-award environmental file on a small northern New England state. Unique recipients are unpublished. Do not read 102 as 102 unique lake-cleanup acres, named mills, or inspection tallies. Environmental Protection Agency in Vermont is the both-keys table. Vermont federal spending is the all-agency state hub. Environmental Protection Agency is the agency book without an VT filter. All spending ties lists other joins.

Named waterbodies are unpublished. Unique facilities are unpublished. The awarding-agency code is 068. Correlation is not causation: Vermont did not cause $395,197,132.65 by existing as a large or small place. Population and outcome scores are not packet facts. The join is 068 × VT only.

Champlain folklore is not a packet field

$395,197,132.65 does not measure lake-cleanup acres, named mills, or inspection tallies. Those series are not USAspending fields on this aggregate. The cell sums award obligations with awarding-agency code 068 and an VT place-of-performance tag.

Do not treat 102 awards as a census of lake-cleanup acres, named mills, or inspection tallies. Parent hubs are supposed to be larger than this pair. If Vermont federal spending or Environmental Protection Agency matched $395,197,132.65 and 102, the join would be pointless. Use the overlay when both keys must stay on. Neighboring-state EPA joins are other pairs, not addends.

Vermont, not a Burlington-only map

Place of performance VT is a geography tag on the award, not a metro list and not a commuting zone. Vermont (VT) excludes New Hampshire, New York, and Massachusetts. A Burlington-coded award with a New York place-of-performance tag is a different cell. Recipient address can differ from that state tag.

This packet does not split $395,197,132.65 by city, county, or named facility. 102 awards stay statewide. A county table would be a different extract. Campaign-finance filings do not fund these USAspending obligations.

One hundred two EPA obligations

Even a thick or thin file records obligations, not necessarily outlays. $395,197,132.65 can include amounts that pay on a later schedule. Citing it as cash already sent in Vermont confuses two concepts. Deobligations and upward adjustments both move the total.

Vermont’s own budget is a different ledger. Mixing it with the 102 awards USAspending file leaves this series. No fiscal year is published in this packet, so this page does not invent one. Keep the obligation label on $395,197,132.65. Sharing a geography with Environmental Protection Agency does not mean FEC donations funded these awards.

Citing EPA in Vermont

Cite USAspending.gov: Environmental Protection Agency (agency 068) obligated $395,197,132.65 on 102 awards coded to Vermont. Name both sides. Keep “obligations.” Do not relabel the total as lake-cleanup acres, named mills, or inspection tallies.

Prefer Environmental Protection Agency in Vermont if the overlay has refreshed after an ingest. Vermont federal spending still includes every other awarding agency tagged to VT. Environmental Protection Agency is the 068 parent without the VT filter. All spending ties indexes other pairs. Do not add those parents into $395,197,132.65.

A usable footnote names Environmental Protection Agency, Vermont, $395,197,132.65, and 102. The compact headline $395.2M is that same dollar total rounded. It is not a second extract. The implied mean near $3,874,481.69 is $395,197,132.65 divided by 102. Means are not medians. USAspending.gov remains the originating system.

Questions

How much has Environmental Protection Agency obligated in Vermont?

USAspending.gov records $395,197,132.65 across 102 awards with awarding agency 068 and a Vermont tag. That is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Vermont’s full federal book. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. The join is a catalog intersection, not a budget.

Does $395.2 million measure Vermont lake-cleanup projects?

No. $395,197,132.65 is an obligation sum on awarding-agency 068 × VT. It does not measure lake-cleanup acres, named mills, or inspection tallies. Those series are not fields on this aggregate. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Why does this EPA file have 102 awards?

102 is an award-record count, including possible continuations and modifications. Dividing $395,197,132.65 by 102 yields about $3,874,481.69 as a mean, not a typical project. Unique recipients are unpublished. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Where is the live table for Environmental Protection Agency in Vermont?

Environmental Protection Agency in Vermont is the overlay for both keys. Vermont federal spending is the all-agency Vermont hub. Environmental Protection Agency is the agency parent. All spending ties indexes other spending ties. Prefer the overlay when both filters must stay on.