Environmental Quality Incentives Program funding in Idaho

Idaho x 10.912 is an EQIP join, not an acreage census

This page pairs CFDA 10.912, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY INCENTIVES PROGRAM, with Idaho place of performance. The join is a USDA NRCS cost-share listing crossed with a state location field, not Idaho’s entire conservation budget and not a census of farms. SpendingVault sums tagged obligations: $173,682,316.98 on 2495 awards. The extract does not list acres, practice codes, or farm names. Treat the pair as a catalog intersection, not a ranking of which state has more need, and not a claim that 2495 awards equal 2,495 farms or 2,495 practices.

Other USDA listings — CRP, ACEP, or different NRCS titles — sit outside this total unless they also carry 10.912. Mixing those listings into $173,682,316.98 would invent a combined figure the packet never computed. Correlation between this obligation sum and irrigated acres is not causation. Acreage figures are not in the packet. Place of performance as Idaho locates the tagged awards; it does not deposit $173,682,316.98 in the state treasury. Boise-versus-Magic-Valley folklore is not a county split in this packet. Rural Rental Assistance on 10.427 in Idaho is a Rural Development overlay, not an NRCS subset.

2,495 awards behind $173.7 million

Mean obligation is about $69,612.15 if $173,682,316.98 were divided evenly across 2495 lines. That ratio is not a published cost-share rate and not a cost per acre. Award count is a row count, including possible continuations and modifications. It is not a count of farms, practices, or counties.

Two thousand four hundred ninety-five lines are too many to narrate one by one. Sort the Idaho 10.912 overlay by amount to see concentration. This page will not invent recipient names. Open Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Idaho for the stored table. Do not convert 2495 into a map of Idaho farms. The $173,682,316.98 total remains an obligation rollup on tagged awards. Inspect named lines rather than inferring an acreage census.

EQIP obligations are not irrigation upgrades already installed

EQIP awards often obligate as contracts are obligated and draw as practices are certified. The $173,682,316.98 headline is the obligation sum, not a punch-list of acres treated and not a Treasury outlay total. No fiscal year is attached. A NRCS EQIP signup table dated to a particular year is not automatically this join unless it uses CFDA 10.912, Idaho geography, and the obligation metric.

The listing title is Environmental Quality Incentives Program. This extract does not split irrigation from livestock practices, and it does not split dairy from range. Those cuts would require award documentation beyond dollars, 2495 awards, CFDA 10.912, and Idaho. This page will not invent a share. Indian Self-Determination 93.441 in Idaho is an IHS overlay.

What the Idaho 10.912 table omits

The extract has no acres, practice codes, or farm names. Facts remain $173,682,316.98, 2495 awards, CFDA 10.912, and Idaho. This page will not invent a ranking against other states’ 10.912 joins. Kansas’s EQIP overlay on this slice is a separate pair with a different award count; do not add the two totals.

Idaho federal spending and Idaho programs place 10.912 among other listings. CFDA 10.912 is the national catalog line. All spending ties indexes other CFDA x state pairs. Mixing those shelves would invent a share of federal spending the packet never computed. The $173,682,316.98 figure is the tagged pair only. Campaign-finance filings are a different public-record system; this join does not claim donations funded these obligations.

Where the 10.912 x Idaho overlay lives

Start with Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Idaho for the 2495-award table behind $173,682,316.98. CFDA 10.912 is the nationwide listing. Idaho federal spending and Idaho programs give state context. All spending ties is the shelf for other program-by-state joins on the same obligation metric. 2,495 awards totaling $173,682,316.98 remain a high-volume contract file, not an acreage census. Practice names and per-acre prices are not in this packet. The $173,682,316.98 total is the tagged pair only. USAspending.gov remains the source; SpendingVault republishes the join. If a later extract revises the rollup, this page’s facts will be stale until the packet is rebuilt. Do not annualize $173,682,316.98: no fiscal year is in the facts.

How to read the Idaho × CFDA 10.912 pair

A ties page exists because two tables meet. One table is the assistance listing (CFDA 10.912). The other is place of performance as Idaho. The headline $173,682,316.98 is the obligation sum on that intersection. It is not a forecast, not a budget request, and not an outlay. It is also not a claim that CFDA 10.912 caused Idaho’s economy to grow. Correlation between geography and a catalog code is the join — nothing more. Use the internal links to step off this pair. If you need award-level names, open the overlay rather than treating this narrative as a recipient directory.

Questions

How much EQIP funding is obligated in Idaho?

USAspending.gov shows $173,682,316.98 in obligations for CFDA 10.912 with Idaho as place of performance, across 2495 awards. The sum is a commitment total on assistance awards, not outlays and not Idaho’s full conservation budget. Other listings are outside this join unless they also carry 10.912.

Do 2,495 awards mean 2,495 Idaho farms?

No. Award count is a row count of assistance awards and can include continuations and modifications. It is not a farm or acre census. The packet does not name producers. See the Idaho 10.912 overlay for named lines as USAspending stored them.

Is Idaho’s EQIP total the same as Kansas EQIP on this slice?

No. Kansas has its own CFDA 10.912 join with a different dollar total and award count. This page is Idaho place of performance only: $173,682,316.98 across 2495 awards. Do not add the two state totals. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Is $174 million already spent on Idaho conservation practices?

Not on this metric. Obligations are recorded commitments on assistance awards. Outlays are payments from the Treasury. The $173,682,316.98 headline is the obligation rollup in SpendingVault’s extract. Certified practices and remaining balances are not published in this packet.