Skip to main content
← All data ties

Environmental Quality Incentives Program in South Dakota

USAspending.gov lists $137,394,100.86 in Environmental Quality Incentives Program obligations (CFDA 10.912) with South Dakota place of performance, across 1,983 awards. One thousand nine hundred eighty-three instruments against that dollar figure imply about $69,285.98 per award. This page is a JOIN of the program catalog to SD. It is not a farm census, an acreage table, or a practice checklist. Obligations are not outlays.

Key figures

  • CFDA 10.912 shows $137,394,100.86 in South Dakota obligations on 1,983 awards.
  • The mean is about $69,285.98 per award.
  • The catalog is Environmental Quality Incentives Program, not a farm census, an acreage table, or a practice checklist.
  • South Dakota is a place-of-performance tag, not a unit census.
  • Figures are obligations, not outlays.

How CFDA 10.912 meets South Dakota

The cell sums award obligations with CFDA 10.912 and a SD place-of-performance tag. $137,394,100.86 is that sum. It is not a ranking of South Dakota against other states. Campaign-finance tables are a different dataset; FEC donations do not fund these USAspending obligations.

One thousand nine hundred eighty-three awards is a high-volume producer file: nearly two thousand instruments can stack into one obligation total. The join does not name recipients. Packet facts are $137,394,100.86, 1,983 awards, SD, and 10.912. Correlation is not causation. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. Keep EQIP and South Dakota together when reading $137,394,100.86.

South Dakota EQIP as a listing, not an operator census

CFDA 10.912 is ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY INCENTIVES PROGRAM. Packet facts on the program side stop at the name Environmental Quality Incentives Program, the number 10.912, $137,394,100.86, and 1,983 awards. This packet lists no award recipients and no contractor names. Mixing this listing with other conservation catalog lines that use different CFDA numbers would invent a combined total the packet never computed. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY INCENTIVES PROGRAM is the catalog title. One thousand nine hundred eighty-three awards is a high-volume producer file: nearly two thousand instruments can stack into one obligation total. The join does not convert dollars into farms, ranches, or conservation practices. Neighbor-state EQIP joins are other pairs.

South Dakota’s EQIP join is a third 10.912 cell in this slice, beside Montana and North Dakota. Do not add those pair totals together on this page. $137,394,100.86 is South Dakota place of performance only. The packet never names producers. A large award count is not a ranking of conservation outcomes against a neighbor.

South Dakota place of performance on 10.912

Place of performance in South Dakota is a USAspending geography field. Sioux Falls, Rapid City, or Aberdeen folklore may send a reader here; those stories are not a metro split in this packet. Awards can list SD while later work occurs elsewhere. Neighbor codes (North Dakota, Minnesota, Iowa, Nebraska, Wyoming, and Montana) stay outside $137,394,100.86. Place of performance can differ from where a recipient is headquartered. This packet does not publish either split. Neighbor-state EQIP joins are other pairs, not addends.

One thousand nine hundred eighty-three awards, still a record count

1,983 is the award-record count. It is not 1,983 farms, ranches, or conservation practices. A mean of about $69,285.98 if $137,394,100.86 were divided evenly across 1,983 lines is arithmetic, not a typical payment. Unique vendors are unpublished. Treat one thousand nine hundred eighty-three as a record count, not a unit census. A later USAspending ingest can restate both $137,394,100.86 and the 1,983-award count without changing the join keys. Agency splits are omitted from this packet. No fiscal year is in the facts, so none is cited here.

Citing EQIP in South Dakota

Keep $137,394,100.86 labeled as obligations. Outlays, remaining balances, and recipient names are unpublished. The join is not a farm census, an acreage table, or a practice checklist. Quote Environmental Quality Incentives Program and South Dakota together. Later bulk files can move both the dollars and the 1,983-award count. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. Unique recipients remain unpublished on this Environmental Quality Incentives Program South Dakota join.

Use /states/sd/programs/10.912/ (Environmental Quality Incentives Program in South Dakota) for the overlay, /programs/10.912/ (CFDA 10.912) for the listing, /states/sd/ (South Dakota federal spending) for the state hub, /states/sd/programs/ (South Dakota programs) for the program index, and /ties/ (All spending ties) for other pairs. Cite CFDA 10.912, South Dakota, $137,394,100.86, USAspending.gov, obligations only. Keep Environmental Quality Incentives Program and South Dakota together when citing $137,394,100.86. CFDA 10.912 lists 1,983 award records on this SD join. Obligations of $137,394,100.86 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this CFDA 10.912 × SD pair. Do not add parent hubs into this state-program cell. Quote CFDA 10.912, South Dakota, and $137,394,100.86 in one sentence. The South Dakota programs index and All spending ties index are larger than this cell. This page is not a farm census, an acreage table, or a practice checklist. 1,983 award records are not 1,983 farms, ranches, or conservation practices. Mean dollars per action remain about $69,285.98 if you divide those two facts. SD is place of performance, not a split of Sioux Falls, Rapid City, or Aberdeen. South Dakota’s EQIP join is a third 10.912 cell in this slice, beside Montana and North Dakota. Do not add those pair totals together on this page. $137,394,100.86 is South Dakota place of performance only. The packet never names producers. A large award count is not a ranking of conservation outcomes against a neighbor. Source note: USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.

Questions

How much EQIP funding is obligated in South Dakota?
USAspending.gov records $137,394,100.86 in CFDA 10.912 obligations with South Dakota place of performance on 1,983 awards. That is the pair total, not an outlay and not a farm census, an acreage table, or a practice checklist. Keep Environmental Quality Incentives Program and South Dakota together when citing $137,394,100.86.
Do 1,983 awards mean 1,983 South Dakota farms?
No. 1,983 is a USAspending award-record count, not 1,983 farms, ranches, or conservation practices. The implied mean is about $69,285.98 per award. Unique recipients are unpublished. Obligations of $137,394,100.86 are not outlays. USAspending.gov remains the source for this 10.912 × SD pair.
Is this South Dakota’s full federal conservation spend?
No. $137,394,100.86 is only the CFDA 10.912 × South Dakota cell. Other catalogs appear on separate South Dakota program pages. Nationwide 10.912 is not limited to South Dakota. Mixing this listing with other conservation catalog lines that use different CFDA numbers would invent a larger total.
Where is the live 10.912 × South Dakota table?
Environmental Quality Incentives Program in South Dakota is the overlay at /states/sd/programs/10.912/. CFDA 10.912 is /programs/10.912/. South Dakota federal spending is /states/sd/. South Dakota programs is /states/sd/programs/. All spending ties is /ties/. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 10.912 × SD pair.

USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.