Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Utah

Utah joined to CFDA 10.912

This page is a join: Environmental Quality Incentives Program and Utah. $124,544,141.55 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both CFDA 10.912 and UT place of performance. It is not every federal dollar in Utah, not Environmental Quality Incentives Program nationwide, and not an outlay register. Correlation is not causation. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset; FEC donations do not fund these USAspending obligations.

Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Utah is the filtered overlay. CFDA 10.912 drops the Utah filter. Utah federal spending drops the CFDA filter. Utah programs lists other Utah catalogs. All spending ties indexes other pairs. Only this tie applies both filters. 1,854 is an award-record count, not 1,854 farms, acres, or named producers.

EQIP as a listing, not an NIH research twin

The official title is ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY INCENTIVES PROGRAM. SpendingVault does not grade EQIP. $124,544,141.55 is an obligation sum, not a verdict. Confusing this join with other USDA conservation catalog lines that use different CFDA numbers would be a different table. Packet facts on the program side are the name Environmental Quality Incentives Program, number 10.912, and the 1,854-award Utah cell. This packet lists no award recipients and no contractor names.

Utah’s EQIP overlay is the thicker 10.912 file in this harvest: 1,854 awards versus New Mexico’s 1,526. More rows do not make Utah a ranking winner. Those are other joins; do not add New Mexico into Utah. NICHD, NINDS, and NIDDK overlays in Utah are HHS research catalogs. Mixing 10.912 with 93.865, 93.853, or 93.847 would invent a combined Utah conservation-and-research book. Recipients stay unpublished.

Utah place of performance on 10.912

UT is the place-of-performance code. Awards billed to Salt Lake City, Logan, or St. George can share the tag. Awards coded to Idaho, Wyoming, Colorado, Arizona, and Nevada stay outside $124,544,141.55 even when a story crosses a border. Utah federal spending is the all-program parent. CFDA 10.912 is one row on Utah programs. $124,544,141.55 is not the state’s complete federal footprint.

1,854 awards, not 1,854 named Utah farms

One thousand eight hundred fifty-four awards sit behind $124,544,141.55. Dividing $124,544,141.55 by 1,854 yields about $67,175.91 as a quotient of two packet facts, not a typical invoice and not a median. Unique recipients are unpublished. Modifications can add rows without naming a new organization. Do not read 1,854 as 1,854 farms, acres, or named producers.

Citing EQIP in Utah

An obligation is a legal commitment. An outlay is a payment. $124,544,141.55 is the former. Citing it as cash already cleared in Utah over-reads the field. The join cannot say that Utah specialized in EQIP because of federal demand. Keep $124,544,141.55 labeled as Environmental Quality Incentives Program obligations in Utah. It is not NIH research catalogs or an acreage count.

Open /states/ut/programs/10.912/ for the overlay, /programs/10.912/ for the program hub, /states/ut/ for Utah federal spending, /states/ut/programs/ for Utah programs, and /ties/ for other pairs. None of those links convert this cell into a farm census, a contract roster, or a named-producer file or into a contractor list. Cite both sides: Environmental Quality Incentives Program and Utah, CFDA 10.912, $124,544,141.55, 1,854 awards, USAspending.gov, obligations only.

Limits of the 10.912 × UT overlay

This page exists because two tables meet: Environmental Quality Incentives Program (CFDA 10.912) and Utah place of performance. $124,544,141.55 is the obligation field on that pair. One thousand eight hundred fifty-four awards remain a USAspending record count, not 1,854 farms, acres, or named producers. The packet does not publish outlays, remaining balances, recipient names, contractor names, or a fiscal year. FEC donations do not fund these USAspending obligations. Correlation is not causation.

Neighbor codes (Idaho, Wyoming, Colorado, Arizona, and Nevada) stay outside $124,544,141.55. Salt Lake City, Logan, or St. George are in-state address examples, not packet splits. Sibling catalogs such as other USDA conservation catalog lines that use different CFDA numbers are other extracts. Reuse $124,544,141.55 only with both join sides named. Prefer live tables at /states/ut/programs/10.912/, /programs/10.912/, /states/ut/, /states/ut/programs/, and /ties/ after later ingests. Cite USAspending.gov, CFDA 10.912, UT, 1,854 awards, obligations only.

Questions

How much Environmental Quality Incentives Program funding is obligated in Utah?

USAspending.gov records $124,544,141.55 in CFDA 10.912 obligations with Utah place of performance on 1,854 awards. That is the pair total, not an outlay and not a farm census, a contract roster, or a named-producer file. Keep Environmental Quality Incentives Program and Utah together when citing $124,544,141.55.

Do 1,854 awards mean 1,854 Utah farms?

No. 1,854 is a USAspending award-record count, not 1,854 farms, acres, or named producers. The implied mean is about $67,175.91 per award. Unique recipients are unpublished. Obligations of $124,544,141.55 are not outlays.

Does this include NIH research catalogs in Utah?

No. $124,544,141.55 is only the CFDA 10.912 × Utah cell. Other catalogs appear on separate Utah program pages. Nationwide 10.912 is not limited to Utah. Mixing this listing with other USDA conservation catalog lines that use different CFDA numbers would invent a larger total.

Where is the live 10.912 × Utah table?

Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Utah is the overlay at /states/ut/programs/10.912/. CFDA 10.912 is /programs/10.912/. Utah federal spending is /states/ut/. Utah programs is /states/ut/programs/. All spending ties is /ties/. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 10.912 × UT pair.