Skip to main content
← All data ties

ELC infectious-disease laboratory capacity in Delaware (CFDA 93.323)

Epidemiology And Laboratory Capacity For Infectious Diseases (Elc) (CFDA 93.323) shows $60,192,252 in USAspending.gov obligations coded to Delaware on 2 awards. Two instruments against that sum produce a mean of about $30.10 million per award. The page joins CDC catalog 93.323 to the DE geography tag. It is not a test-volume dashboard, an outbreak log, or cash already paid.

Key figures

  • CFDA 93.323 shows $60,192,252 in Delaware obligations on 2 awards.
  • The mean is about $30.10 million per award.
  • The catalog is Epidemiology And Laboratory Capacity For Infectious Diseases (Elc), not immunization cooperative agreements.
  • Delaware is a place-of-performance tag, not a laboratory census.
  • Figures are obligations, not outlays.

Delaware’s ELC cell versus the national 93.323 table

CFDA 93.323 is titled EPIDEMIOLOGY AND LABORATORY CAPACITY FOR INFECTIOUS DISEASES (ELC). Filtered to Delaware place of performance, obligations sum to $60,192,252 on 2 awards. ELC often posts as one or two large cooperative-agreement records rather than one row per assay. That posting pattern still does not name a laboratory or a health department. Packet facts stop at $60,192,252, 2 awards, DE, and 93.323.

The national Epidemiology And Laboratory Capacity For Infectious Diseases (Elc) hub includes every state. Delaware's spending hub includes every program. This tie is the intersection. $60,192,252 is an obligation aggregate from USAspending.gov, not an outlay and not a count of tests, outbreaks, or health departments in Wilmington, Dover, or Newark.

No fiscal year appears in the packet. Do not treat $60,192,252 as a pandemic-year earmark or as money already drawn. Do not invent contractors, labs, or award recipients. Correlation is not causation.

93.323 is not immunization cooperative agreements in Delaware

Immunization Cooperative Agreements (CFDA 93.268) and other CDC preparedness catalogs sit on different numbers. Mixing those dollars into $60,192,252 would invent a broader total than this 93.323 × DE cell contains. Facts available: Delaware, CFDA 93.323, $60,192,252, 2 awards. Recipient names, subawards, and laboratory counts are not in the facts.

The catalog title names Epidemiology And Laboratory Capacity For Infectious Diseases (Elc), not a ranking of Delaware case counts. Dividing $60,192,252 by 2 yields about $30.10 million per award—an ELC cooperative-agreement instrument size, not a typical assay cost. Unique recipients are unpublished. Two is not a count of laboratories or health departments.

Delaware geography on the ELC tag

DE is the place-of-performance code. Awards billed to Dover, Wilmington, or another Delaware locality can share the tag. Awards coded to Maryland, New Jersey, or Pennsylvania stay outside $60,192,252 even when a metro or watershed approaches the border. A Dover-coded cooperative agreement can still describe statewide laboratory work under one DE tag. The code does not convert $60.2 million into a lab-capacity map.

Delaware federal spending is the all-program parent. 93.323 is one row on Delaware programs. $60,192,252 is not the state's complete federal footprint. Open Epidemiology And Laboratory Capacity For Infectious Diseases (Elc) in Delaware for the filtered table, CFDA 93.323 for 93.323 without a Delaware filter, and All spending ties for other pairs. Do not add those parents into $60,192,252.

Reading 2 awards under $60.2 million

$60,192,252 ÷ 2 is about $30.10 million per award. That average is an ELC cooperative-agreement instrument, not a typical laboratory assay cost. It is not a median. Net obligations can include downward modifications; the total shown is the aggregate in the facts. Treat 2 as a record count in an aggregate, not as 2 finished laboratories.

Without a transaction register on this page, you cannot see how many of the 2 rows are continuations, renewals, or corrections. Later ingests can restate $60,192,252 without changing the join key of 93.323 and DE.

What the ELC–Delaware pair does not prove

A large 93.323 total tagged to Delaware does not measure case counts, and it does not equal laboratory throughput. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. Correlation is not causation. The headline remains $60,192,252 on 2 awards for Epidemiology And Laboratory Capacity For Infectious Diseases (Elc) in Delaware.

Keep both sides of the join: Epidemiology And Laboratory Capacity For Infectious Diseases (Elc) and Delaware, obligations only. Do not annualize $60,192,252 without a year field—this packet publishes none. Do not treat 2 as a lab or outbreak census. Quote USAspending.gov and the overlay path rather than a program story.

Using the Delaware × 93.323 overlay

The overlay target is the Delaware × CFDA 93.323 table. Open Epidemiology And Laboratory Capacity For Infectious Diseases (Elc) in Delaware when you want the same $60,192,252 / 2-awards cell in the site's data chrome. CFDA 93.323 drops the Delaware filter. Delaware federal spending drops the CFDA filter. Delaware programs lists other catalogs beside ELC. All spending ties is the directory of other pairs.

This page exists because two tables meet: a CFDA program and a place-of-performance state. It does not exist to argue that Delaware won or lost federal money, that donations paid for the awards, or that obligations equal cash. The pair is 93.323 plus DE. Obligations of $60,192,252 are not outlays. Cite Epidemiology And Laboratory Capacity For Infectious Diseases (Elc) together with Delaware whenever you reuse $60,192,252.

Questions

How much ELC funding is obligated in Delaware?
USAspending.gov shows $60,192,252 in CFDA 93.323 obligations coded to Delaware across 2 awards. The join uses the program number and Delaware place of performance. The total is obligations, not outlays. Keep Epidemiology And Laboratory Capacity For Infectious Diseases (Elc) and Delaware together when citing $60,192,252.
Is ELC the same as immunization cooperative agreements in Delaware?
No. This cell is CFDA 93.323 only. Immunization Cooperative Agreements (CFDA 93.268) are other catalogs. Mixing those numbers would invent a total larger than $60,192,252. Two is a record count, not a laboratory census. Keep Epidemiology And Laboratory Capacity For Infectious Diseases (Elc) and Delaware together when citing $60,192,252. The packet publishes no fiscal year, so the 93.323 × Delaware cell cannot be annualized from these facts.
Does 2 awards mean 2 Delaware laboratories?
Two is a USAspending award-record count, not a lab, test, or health-department census. The implied mean is about $30.10 million per award. Unique recipients are unpublished. Obligations of $60,192,252 are not outlays. Packet facts stop at $60,192,252, 2 awards, DE, and 93.323. Place of performance is a geography tag, not a roster of named recipients.
Do these obligations equal tests processed in Delaware?
No. $60,192,252 is an obligation sum. Outlays are a different USAspending series. This packet has no test or outbreak count. Keep the obligation label when citing the 93.323 × DE pair. Keep the obligation label on $60,192,252 and name both Epidemiology And Laboratory Capacity For Infectious Diseases (Elc) and Delaware. Original filings for CFDA 93.323 remain on USAspending.gov.

USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.