Federal Transit Formula Grants in Utah
Place of performance Utah plus CFDA 20.507 (Federal Transit Formula Grants) sums to $151,793,570 across 16 awards in USAspending.gov. sixteen instruments against $151.8 million imply about $9.49 million per award. It is not Utah transit capital-investment grants, not a nationwide 20.507 rollup, and not Utah's entire federal spending. The join is a table intersection, not a ranking of states. Obligations are not outlays.
Key figures
- CFDA 20.507 shows $151,793,570 in Utah obligations on 16 awards.
- The mean is about $9.49 million per award.
- Sixteen awards are not sixteen named transit agencies.
- Utah is a place-of-performance tag, not an agency, route, or named-project census.
- Figures are obligations, not outlays.
Sixteen Utah instruments on CFDA 20.507
CFDA 20.507 is titled FEDERAL TRANSIT FORMULA GRANTS. Crossed with Utah place of performance, obligations sum to $151,793,570 on 16 awards. The national 20.507 hub includes other states. Utah’s spending hub includes other programs. Only this intersection is reported here. $151,793,570 is an obligation aggregate from USAspending.gov, not an outlay and not a count of Utah transit agencies.
sixteen awards is a FTA urbanized-area formula file with sixteen instruments. The join does not name recipients. Packet facts are $151,793,570, 16 awards, UT, and 20.507. Correlation is not causation. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. Keep Federal Transit Formula Grants and Utah together when reading $151,793,570.
Readers should keep CFDA 20.507 and Utah in the same sentence as $151,793,570. The live table lives at /states/ut/programs/20.507/. Parent hubs at /programs/20.507/, /states/ut/, and /states/ut/programs/ are larger than this cell. /ties/ lists other spending ties. Do not add those parents into $151,793,570.
Formula grants, not capital-investment grants
Federal Transit Capital Investment Grants (CFDA 20.500) are a different FTA catalog. Mixing 20.507 and 20.500 in Utah would invent a combined formula-and-capital book. Mixing those series into $151,793,570 would invent a broader total than this cell contains. Facts available: Utah, CFDA 20.507, $151,793,570, 16 awards. Agency names, ridership figures, and project lists are unpublished.
The catalog title names Federal Transit Formula Grants, not a ranking of Utah transit agencies. Dividing $151,793,570 by 16 yields about $9.49 million per award. Unique recipients are unpublished. 16 is not an agency, route, or named-project census.
Utah geography on the transit-formula tag
UT is the place-of-performance code. Awards billed to Salt Lake City, Provo, or Ogden can share the tag. Awards coded to Idaho, Wyoming, Colorado, Arizona, and Nevada stay outside $151,793,570 even when activity later crosses those lines. The code does not convert $151.8 million into a rail atlas.
Utah federal spending is the all-program parent. 20.507 is one row on Utah programs. $151.8 million is not the state’s complete federal footprint. Open Federal Transit Formula Grants in Utah for the filtered table, CFDA 20.507 for the catalog without a Utah filter, and All spending ties for other pairs. Do not add those parents into $151,793,570.
Sixteen awards and a low-eight-figure mean
$151,793,570 ÷ 16 is about $9.49 million per award. That average is a low-eight-figure mean on sixteen rows, not a median. Net obligations can include downward modifications; the total shown is the aggregate in the facts. Treat 16 as a record count, not as 16 unique agencies or 16 named projects.
Without a transaction register, you cannot see how many of the 16 rows are continuations, renewals, or corrections. Later ingests can restate $151,793,570 without changing the join key of 20.507 and UT. USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $151,793,570 is the net total supplied in the facts. The pair remains Federal Transit Formula Grants plus Utah. Do not treat $151,793,570 as an outlay series.
What Utah transit formula funding does not prove
A large 20.507 total tagged to Utah does not measure whether Utah ridership rose, and it does not equal buses already purchased. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. Correlation is not causation. The headline remains $151,793,570 on 16 awards for Federal Transit Formula Grants in Utah.
Keep both sides of the join: Federal Transit Formula Grants and Utah, obligations only. Do not annualize $151,793,570 without a year field—this packet publishes none. Do not treat 16 as an agency, route, or named-project census. Quote USAspending.gov and the overlay path rather than a commuter-rail narrative. Cite Federal Transit Formula Grants together with Utah whenever you reuse $151,793,570.
Citing CFDA 20.507 in Utah
The overlay target is the Utah × CFDA 20.507 table. Open Federal Transit Formula Grants in Utah when you want the same $151,793,570 / 16-award cell in the site’s data chrome. CFDA 20.507 drops the Utah filter. Utah federal spending drops the CFDA filter. Utah programs lists other catalogs beside 20.507. All spending ties indexes other pairs.
This page exists because two tables meet: a CFDA program and a place-of-performance state. It does not exist to argue that Utah won or lost federal money, that donations paid for the awards, or that obligations equal cash. The pair is 20.507 plus UT. Obligations of $151,793,570 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 20.507 × UT pair. 16 remains an award-record count, not a person, facility, or project census. Formula grants are a distinct FTA catalog from New Starts-style capital investment. Sixteen Utah awards against $151,793,570 imply about $9.49 million per award. Salt Lake City folklore is not a Wasatch Front split. Nevada-coded transit awards stay outside. Recipients stay unpublished.
Questions
- How much Federal Transit Formula Grant funding is obligated in Utah?
- USAspending records $151,793,570 in CFDA 20.507 obligations with Utah place of performance on 16 awards. That is the pair total, not an outlay. Keep Federal Transit Formula Grants and Utah together when citing $151,793,570. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. The join is a catalog intersection, not a budget.
- Do 16 awards mean 16 Utah transit agencies?
- 16 is a USAspending award-record count, not an agency, route, or named-project census. The implied mean is about $9.49 million per award. Unique recipients are unpublished. 16 is a record count, not a person or facility census. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
- Is this Utah's total federal transit spending?
- No. This join is CFDA 20.507 only. Capital Investment Grants use CFDA 20.500 and sit on a separate Utah program page. Nationwide 20.507 is not limited to Utah. Obligations of $151,793,570 are not outlays. The overlay is the live Federal Transit Formula Grants–Utah table.
- Has this formula money already been spent on buses?
- No. $151,793,570 is an obligation sum. Outlays are a different USAspending series. Drawdowns can lag the federal obligation. This packet has no outlay total. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 20.507 × UT pair. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.