Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System in Montana

Two Montana instruments on CFDA 15.516

CFDA 15.516 is titled FORT PECK RESERVATION RURAL WATER SYSTEM. Crossed with Montana place of performance, obligations sum to $142,958,532.72 on 2 awards. The national 15.516 hub includes other states. Montana’s spending hub includes other programs. Only this intersection is reported here. $142,958,532.72 is an obligation aggregate from USAspending.gov, not an outlay and not a count of Fort Peck water-system projects.

two awards is a thin project-specific Interior file with two large instruments. The join does not name recipients. Packet facts are $142,958,532.72, 2 awards, MT, and 15.516. Correlation is not causation. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. Keep Fort Peck Rural Water System and Montana together when reading $142,958,532.72.

Readers should keep CFDA 15.516 and Montana in the same sentence as $142,958,532.72. The live table lives at /states/mt/programs/15.516/. Parent hubs at /programs/15.516/, /states/mt/, and /states/mt/programs/ are larger than this cell. /ties/ lists other spending ties. Do not add those parents into $142,958,532.72.

Fort Peck rural water, not wildlife restoration

Wildlife Restoration (CFDA 15.611) is a different Interior catalog in Montana. Mixing 15.516 and 15.611 would invent a combined water-and-wildlife book. The catalog names Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System; it does not publish a contractor roster. Mixing those series into $142,958,532.72 would invent a broader total than this cell contains. Facts available: Montana, CFDA 15.516, $142,958,532.72, 2 awards. Contractor names, pipeline miles, and treatment-plant IDs are unpublished.

The catalog title names Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System, not a ranking of Montana reservations. Dividing $142,958,532.72 by 2 yields about $71.48 million per award. Unique recipients are unpublished. 2 is not a household, mile, or named-contractor census.

Montana geography on a named-system catalog

MT is the place-of-performance code. Awards billed to Wolf Point, Glasgow, or Poplar can share the tag. Awards coded to North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, and Idaho stay outside $142,958,532.72 even when activity later crosses those lines. The code does not convert $143.0 million into a pipeline atlas.

Montana federal spending is the all-program parent. 15.516 is one row on Montana programs. $143.0 million is not the state’s complete federal footprint. Open Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System in Montana for the filtered table, CFDA 15.516 for the catalog without a Montana filter, and All spending ties for other pairs. Do not add those parents into $142,958,532.72.

Two awards and a high-eight-figure mean

$142,958,532.72 ÷ 2 is about $71.48 million per award. That average is a high-eight-figure mean on two rows, not a median. Net obligations can include downward modifications; the total shown is the aggregate in the facts. Treat 2 as a record count, not as 2 unique contractors or 2 named plants.

Without a transaction register, you cannot see how many of the 2 rows are continuations, renewals, or corrections. Later ingests can restate $142,958,532.72 without changing the join key of 15.516 and MT. USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $142,958,532.72 is the net total supplied in the facts. The pair remains Fort Peck Rural Water System plus Montana. Do not treat $142,958,532.72 as an outlay series.

What Fort Peck rural-water funding does not prove

A large 15.516 total tagged to Montana does not measure whether Fort Peck tap-water quality changed, and it does not equal pipe already in the ground. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. Correlation is not causation. The headline remains $142,958,532.72 on 2 awards for Fort Peck Rural Water System in Montana.

Keep both sides of the join: Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System and Montana, obligations only. Do not annualize $142,958,532.72 without a year field—this packet publishes none. Do not treat 2 as a household, mile, or named-contractor census. Quote USAspending.gov and the overlay path rather than a reservation-pipeline narrative. Cite Fort Peck Rural Water System together with Montana whenever you reuse $142,958,532.72.

Citing CFDA 15.516 in Montana

The overlay target is the Montana × CFDA 15.516 table. Open Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System in Montana when you want the same $142,958,532.72 / 2-award cell in the site’s data chrome. CFDA 15.516 drops the Montana filter. Montana federal spending drops the CFDA filter. Montana programs lists other catalogs beside 15.516. All spending ties indexes other pairs.

This page exists because two tables meet: a CFDA program and a place-of-performance state. It does not exist to argue that Montana won or lost federal money, that donations paid for the awards, or that obligations equal cash. The pair is 15.516 plus MT. Obligations of $142,958,532.72 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 15.516 × MT pair. 2 remains an award-record count, not a person, facility, or project census. The catalog title names Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System; the join still does not name recipients. Two Montana awards against $142,958,532.72 imply about $71.5 million per award as a ratio. Wolf Point folklore is not a Roosevelt County split. North Dakota-coded water awards stay outside. Recipients stay unpublished.

Questions

How much Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System funding is obligated in Montana?

USAspending records $142,958,532.72 in CFDA 15.516 obligations with Montana place of performance on 2 awards. That is the pair total, not an outlay. Keep Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System and Montana together when citing $142,958,532.72. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Do 2 awards mean 2 Montana water contractors?

2 is a USAspending award-record count, not a household, mile, or named-contractor census. The implied mean is about $71.48 million per award. Unique recipients are unpublished. 2 is a record count, not a person or facility census. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Is this Montana's total federal water spending?

No. This join is CFDA 15.516 only. Wildlife Restoration uses CFDA 15.611 and sits on a separate Montana program page. Nationwide 15.516 is not limited to Montana. Obligations of $142,958,532.72 are not outlays. The overlay is the live Fort Peck Rural Water System–Montana table.

Has this rural-water money already been spent on pipe?

No. $142,958,532.72 is an obligation sum. Outlays are a different USAspending series. Drawdowns can lag the federal obligation. This packet has no outlay total. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 15.516 × MT pair. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.