General Services Administration in North Carolina 9th District (NC-09)
USAspending.gov records $1,326,361,444.16 in General Services Administration obligations with place of performance in North Carolina 9th District (NC-09). That awarding-agency 047 cell is 14.0% of the district's $9,446,023,244 published book, not a federal-building inventory and not cash already paid. The join lists 310 award records. This page reports the pair, not a ranking of North Carolina districts.
Key figures
- USAspending records $1,326,361,444.16 in GSA obligations in NC-09 (agency 047).
- That cell is 14.0% of the district's $9,446,023,244 published book.
- 310 award records are not a building or lease census.
- The total is commitments, not outlays. FEC donations do not fund this cell.
What the GSA–NC-09 join is
Agency 047 and North Carolina 9th District (NC-09) meet in one place-of-performance cell. $1,326,361,444.16 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum tagged to that pair. It is not the district's full $9,446,023,244 book, not every GSA dollar in North Carolina, and not an outlay. The North Carolina 9th District hub still lists other awarding agencies; the General Services Administration hub still lists other districts. Only this intersection is reported here.
GSA speech often names leases, schedules, and public buildings in one breath. This packet does not split $1,326,361,444.16 among those vehicles, name lessors, or count square feet. A reader who assigns the cell to a single courthouse or a single schedule vendor adds a label the facts do not carry. Correlation with real-estate news is not causation.
NC-09's district book beside agency 047
14.0% of $9,446,023,244 is tagged to General Services Administration in this extract. The remainder sits on other awarding-agency rows for the same district. Adding those rows back into $1,326,361,444.16 would double-count. The North Carolina 9th District page at /districts/NC-09/ is the parent without an agency-047 filter.
General Services Administration at /agencies/047/ is the parent without an NC-09 filter. North Carolina federal spending at /states/nc/ drops the district cut. Do not treat $1,326,361,444.16 as statewide GSA obligations. All spending ties at /ties/ indexes other district–agency pairs. Obligations remain commitments, not checks cleared.
310 award records are not a lease roster
310 is the award-record count published with this General Services Administration × NC-09 cell, not a count of buildings and not unique vendors. Dividing $1,326,361,444.16 by 310 would invent a typical invoice the packet never computed. Schedule orders and modifications can add lines without adding lessors. Named contractors are unpublished.
What the GSA NC-09 table omits
No outlays, no building inventory, no lease roster, no named primes. Campaign donations recorded on FEC.gov do not fund this USAspending cell. Place of performance is a geography tag, not proof that a GSA region headquarters sits in NC-09. Keep agency 047 and North Carolina 9th District on the same citation as $1,326,361,444.16.
Citing GSA in North Carolina 9th District
A clean footnote names General Services Administration (agency 047), North Carolina 9th District (NC-09), $1,326,361,444.16 in obligations, and 310 award records on USAspending.gov. Keep the obligation word. Quote the district hub if you need every awarding agency in NC-09, and quote the GSA hub if you need agency 047 without the district filter.
Reuse $1,326,361,444.16 only as General Services Administration obligations with place of performance in NC-09. The 310 award-record count stays on this join. Filings remain on USAspending.gov. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset. Keep General Services Administration (agency 047) and North Carolina 9th District (NC-09) together when citing $1,326,361,444.16. The 310 award-record count is the join field, not a unique-vendor census. Obligations of $1,326,361,444.16 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. Do not add the district parent of $9,446,023,244 into this agency-047 cell. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. Place of performance in NC-09 is a geography tag, not a contractor roster. 14.0% is the published share of $9,446,023,244 tagged to General Services Administration in this extract. Other awarding agencies on the North Carolina 9th District hub sit outside $1,326,361,444.16. Reuse the figure only as the 047 × NC-09 obligation join. Later USAspending ingests can restate $1,326,361,444.16. Cite the pair as commitments, not as checks already cleared in North Carolina. The All spending ties index holds other keys.
Questions
- How much did GSA obligate in North Carolina 9th District?
- USAspending.gov shows $1,326,361,444.16 in General Services Administration obligations with place of performance in North Carolina 9th District (NC-09). The sum is a commitment total, not outlays and not the district's full $9,446,023,244 book. Other agencies in NC-09 sit outside this join.
- Do 310 awards equal 310 GSA buildings in NC-09?
- No. The packet publishes 310 as the join award-record count, not as buildings, leases, or unique vendors. The extract does not name contractors. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. Keep agency 047 and NC-09 in the citation. 310 is the join award-record count, not a unique-recipient census.
- Is this all federal spending in North Carolina 9th District?
- No. The join is awarding agency 047 crossed with NC-09 place of performance. The district parent in this packet is $9,446,023,244. GSA's share of that book is 14.0%. Other awarding agencies are separate cells on the district hub.
- Did FEC donations fund these GSA awards?
- No. $1,326,361,444.16 is a USAspending obligation aggregate. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset and do not fund these awards. Outlays are unpublished. Cite agency 047 plus North Carolina 9th District (NC-09). USAspending.gov remains the source for agency 047 in NC-09.
USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to awarding agency. District 90/98 (multi/non-voting placeholders) are omitted. Obligations are not outlays.