Geodetic Surveys and NGRS Services in New Hampshire

Three geodesy awards tagged to New Hampshire

Two tables meet: CFDA 11.400 (Geodetic Surveys And Services (Geodesy And Applications Of The National Geodetic Reference System)) and New Hampshire (NH) as place of performance. Their intersection is $71,299,299 on 3 USAspending.gov awards. The join is not a benchmark, CORS station, or survey-crew census. Awards coded to Vermont, Maine, or Massachusetts stay outside this cell even if activity later crosses those lines.

Geodesy cooperative agreements and survey awards can hold most of $71,299,299 while the count remains 3. Dividing $71,299,299 by 3 gives a mean of about $23,766,433. That ratio is not a typical survey contract and not a typical monument. Unique recipients are unpublished.

Concord did not earn 11.400 by sitting on an NH tag. Neighboring New England states keep their own joins. The overlay Geodetic Surveys And Services (Geodesy And Applications Of The National Geodetic Reference System) in New Hampshire holds the stored rows. Do not add coastal mapping or hydrography listings into $71,299,299.

CFDA 11.400 without a monument roster

GEODETIC SURVEYS AND SERVICES (GEODESY AND APPLICATIONS OF THE NATIONAL GEODETIC REFERENCE SYSTEM) is the catalog wording USAspending stores on the assistance line. It is not a ranking of New Hampshire against other states. The national CFDA 11.400 hub drops the New Hampshire filter. This packet quotes no nationwide geodetic surveys and National Geodetic Reference System applications total.

Readers who want NGS datasheets, CORS maps, and NOAA geodesy publications should open those publications. Mixing them with 3 USAspending rows would invent a figure this packet does not support. CORS-station folklore is not a field in the facts.

New Hampshire federal spending besides geodetic surveys

Open New Hampshire federal spending for every program coded to the state. Open New Hampshire programs for the directory that includes 11.400 as one row. $71,299,299 is the tagged pair only. Coastal mapping or hydrography listings remain separate joins.

A geodetic surveys and National Geodetic Reference System applications award can carry a New Hampshire geography tag because a pass-through agency sits there. That tag does not prove work stayed inside New Hampshire after obligation. Manchester is not a named recipient of $71,299,299.

Survey obligations are not benchmarks already set

$71,299,299 is an obligation rollup. Outlays — Treasury payments — are a different USAspending series and are not in this packet. Drawdowns can lag the commitment. Cite USAspending.gov, not a state-budget story.

Manchester-versus-Portsmouth folklore is not a CORS split. Unique monuments are unpublished. Concord folklore is not a split of the 3 rows. No fiscal year is attached to $71,299,299.

How to cite Geodetic Surveys in New Hampshire

A complete citation names Geodetic Surveys And Services (Geodesy And Applications Of The National Geodetic Reference System), CFDA 11.400, New Hampshire, $71,299,299, and 3 awards, and labels the dollars as obligations. All spending ties indexes other pairs on the same metric.

If a later ingest restates the cell, the overlay Geodetic Surveys And Services (Geodesy And Applications Of The National Geodetic Reference System) in New Hampshire is the live source. This JSON is a packet snapshot. Parent hubs (CFDA 11.400, New Hampshire federal spending, New Hampshire programs) are not extra dollars to add.

Limits of the 11.400 × NH overlay

FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. Matching 11.400 to NH is not causation. 3 is a record count, not a benchmark, CORS station, or survey-crew census. Do not rank New Hampshire as a winner or loser on geodetic surveys and National Geodetic Reference System applications.

Manchester-versus-Portsmouth folklore is not a CORS split. Unique monuments are unpublished. Keep Geodetic Surveys And Services (Geodesy And Applications Of The National Geodetic Reference System), New Hampshire, $71,299,299, and 3 awards together in every reuse. Place of performance as NH locates the tagged awards; it does not prove every dollar stayed inside New Hampshire after obligation. Concord folklore is not a split of the 3 rows, and Manchester is not a named recipient of $71,299,299.

Questions

How much Geodetic Surveys and Services funding is obligated in New Hampshire?

USAspending.gov records $71,299,299 in CFDA 11.400 obligations across 3 awards coded to New Hampshire. That is a program × state join, not an outlay and not New Hampshire's full federal total. Keep both the program name and New Hampshire in any citation.

Do 3 awards mean 3 New Hampshire survey monuments?

Award count is a row count. $71,299,299 ÷ 3 is about $23,766,433 per record as a mean, not a typical survey contract and not a typical monument. Geodesy cooperative agreements and survey awards can dominate dollars. This packet does not list recipients. See Geodetic Surveys And Services (Geodesy And Applications Of The National Geodetic Reference System) in New Hampshire for the stored table.

Is this New Hampshire's entire federal mapping or NOAA book?

No. The $71,299,299 and 3 awards are USAspending.gov obligation records for CFDA 11.400 with a New Hampshire geography tag. Coastal mapping, hydrography, and other NOAA listings use different CFDAs. Those dollars sit outside this join. Mixing those files with this join would invent a figure the packet does not support.

Where is the live New Hampshire × 11.400 table?

Geodetic Surveys And Services (Geodesy And Applications Of The National Geodetic Reference System) in New Hampshire is the overlay. See New Hampshire federal spending, New Hampshire programs, CFDA 11.400, and All spending ties. Later bulk files override this snapshot. Keep the obligation label on $71,299,299. Do not invent a fiscal year.