GGRF Zero Emission Technologies Grants in District of Columbia

The District meeting CFDA 66.959

This page exists because two tables meet: Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program (CFDA 66.959) and District of Columbia (DC). USAspending.gov records $218,570,000 on 2 awards at that intersection. Correlation is not causation: District of Columbia did not cause $218,570,000 by existing as a large or small place. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell.

Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program in District of Columbia applies both keys. CFDA 66.959 is CFDA 66.959 without a District of Columbia filter. District of Columbia federal spending is all-program District of Columbia spending. District of Columbia programs lists other District of Columbia programs. All spending ties indexes other joins. Correlation is not causation: District of Columbia did not cause $218,570,000 by existing as a large or small place.

Zero-emission grants as a listing, not a project map

CFDA 66.959 is GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION FUND: SECTION 134(A)(1) - ZERO EMISSION TECHNOLOGIES GRANT PROGRAM. Packet facts on the program side stop at the name Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program, the number 66.959, $218,570,000, and 2 awards. This packet lists no award recipients and no contractor names. Mixing this listing with other EPA climate or revolving-fund catalogs that use different CFDA numbers would invent a combined total the packet never computed. GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION FUND: SECTION 134(A)(1) - ZERO EMISSION TECHNOLOGIES GRANT PROGRAM is the catalog title. Two awards is a two-record environmental-finance file: two instruments can still carry more than two hundred million dollars. The join does not convert dollars into projects, grantees, or tons reduced. Neighbor-state GGRF zero-emission grants joins are other pairs.

Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program is a statutory catalog title, not a score of emissions avoided. Two award records against $218,570,000 produce a nine-figure implied mean; that ratio is arithmetic, not a typical invoice. The packet never names grantees, technologies, or sites. Other District EPA-adjacent overlays in this harvest use other CFDA numbers. Place-of-performance DC is not a nationwide GGRF rollup. Quote CFDA 66.959 and the District of Columbia together.

District place of performance on 66.959

Place of performance in District of Columbia is a USAspending geography field. Washington, or sites inside the District folklore may send a reader here; those stories are not a metro split in this packet. Awards can list DC while later work occurs elsewhere. Neighbor codes (Maryland and Virginia, stored as other state keys) stay outside $218,570,000. Place of performance can differ from where a recipient is headquartered. This packet does not publish either split. Neighbor-state GGRF zero-emission grants joins are other pairs, not addends.

District of Columbia federal spending is the all-program parent. 66.959 is one row on District of Columbia programs. $218,570,000 is not the state's complete federal footprint. Open Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program in District of Columbia for the filtered table, CFDA 66.959 for 66.959 without a District of Columbia filter, and All spending ties for other pairs. Do not add those parents into $218,570,000.

Two awards, not two named contractors

2 is the award-record count. It is not 2 projects, grantees, or tons reduced. A mean of about $109,285,000 if $218,570,000 were divided evenly across 2 lines is arithmetic, not a typical payment. Unique vendors are unpublished. Treat two as a record count, not a unit census. A later USAspending ingest can restate both $218,570,000 and the 2-award count without changing the join keys. Agency splits are omitted from this packet. No fiscal year is in the facts, so none is cited here.

What GGRF in the District will not prove

Keep $218,570,000 labeled as obligations. Outlays, remaining balances, and recipient names are unpublished. The join is not a project census, a named-grantee roster, or a tons-reduced score. Quote Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program and District of Columbia together. Later bulk files can move both the dollars and the 2-award count. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. Unique recipients remain unpublished on this Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program District of Columbia join.

Use /states/dc/programs/66.959/ (Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program in District of Columbia) for the overlay, /programs/66.959/ (CFDA 66.959) for the listing, /states/dc/ (District of Columbia federal spending) for the state hub, /states/dc/programs/ (District of Columbia programs) for the program index, and /ties/ (All spending ties) for other pairs. Cite CFDA 66.959, District of Columbia, $218,570,000, USAspending.gov, obligations only. Keep Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program and District of Columbia together when citing $218,570,000. CFDA 66.959 lists 2 award records on this DC join. Obligations of $218,570,000 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this CFDA 66.959 × DC pair. Do not add parent hubs into this state-program cell. Quote CFDA 66.959, District of Columbia, and $218,570,000 in one sentence. The District of Columbia programs index and All spending ties index are larger than this cell. This page is not a project census, a named-grantee roster, or a tons-reduced score. 2 award records are not 2 projects, grantees, or tons reduced. Mean dollars per action remain about $109,285,000 if you divide those two facts. DC is place of performance, not a split of Washington, or sites inside the District. Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program is a statutory catalog title, not a score of emissions avoided. Two award records against $218,570,000 produce a nine-figure implied mean; that ratio is arithmetic, not a typical invoice. The packet never.

Questions

How much GGRF zero-emission grants funding is obligated in District of Columbia?

USAspending.gov records $218,570,000 in CFDA 66.959 obligations with District of Columbia place of performance on 2 awards. That is the pair total, not an outlay and not a project census, a named-grantee roster, or a tons-reduced score. Keep Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program and District of Columbia together when citing $218,570,000.

Do 2 awards mean 2 District climate projects?

No. 2 is a USAspending award-record count, not 2 projects, grantees, or tons reduced. The implied mean is about $109,285,000 per award. Unique recipients are unpublished. Obligations of $218,570,000 are not outlays. USAspending.gov remains the source for this 66.959 × DC pair.

Is this the District's full federal EPA spend?

No. $218,570,000 is only the CFDA 66.959 × District of Columbia cell. Other catalogs appear on separate District of Columbia program pages. Nationwide 66.959 is not limited to District of Columbia. Mixing this listing with other EPA climate or revolving-fund catalogs that use different CFDA numbers would invent a larger total.

Where is the live 66.959 × District of Columbia table?

Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program in District of Columbia is the overlay at /states/dc/programs/66.959/. CFDA 66.959 is /programs/66.959/. District of Columbia federal spending is /states/dc/. District of Columbia programs is /states/dc/programs/. All spending ties is /ties/. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 66.959 × DC pair.