Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program in New Mexico

One New Mexico instrument on CFDA 66.959

CFDA 66.959 is titled GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION FUND: SECTION 134(A)(1) - ZERO EMISSION TECHNOLOGIES GRANT PROGRAM. Crossed with New Mexico place of performance, obligations sum to $156,120,000 on 1 award. The national 66.959 hub includes other states. New Mexico’s spending hub includes other programs. Only this intersection is reported here. $156,120,000 is an obligation aggregate from USAspending.gov, not an outlay and not a count of zero-emission projects in New Mexico.

A single award is a statewide Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund instrument posted as one award. The join does not name the recipient. Packet facts are $156,120,000, 1 award, NM, and 66.959. Correlation is not causation. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. Keep Zero Emission Technologies Grants and New Mexico together when reading $156,120,000.

Section 134(a)(1) grants, not other GGRF strands

Other EPA Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund strands use different CFDA numbers. Mixing those lines into New Mexico 66.959 would invent a combined GGRF book. Nevada's 66.959 overlay is a different state key and must not be added here. Mixing those series into $156,120,000 would invent a broader total than this cell contains. Facts available: New Mexico, CFDA 66.959, $156,120,000, 1 award. Recipient names, project sites, and technology types are unpublished.

The catalog title names Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program, not a ranking of New Mexico utilities. With n = 1, a mean of $156.12 million is just the total restated. Unique recipients are unpublished. 1 is not a project, utility, or named-grantee census.

Section 134(a)(1) is catalog language, not a statute walkthrough. One New Mexico award of $156,120,000 is a single instrument, not a project roster. Albuquerque folklore is not a Bernalillo County split. Texas-coded GGRF awards stay outside. Recipients stay unpublished. Do not merge the Nevada 66.959 cell into this NM overlay. Quote Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program in New Mexico, CFDA 66.959, New Mexico federal spending, New Mexico programs, and All spending ties as separate pages rather than summing them.

New Mexico geography on a single EPA row

NM is the place-of-performance code. Awards billed to Albuquerque, Santa Fe, or Las Cruces can share the tag. Awards coded to Texas, Arizona, Colorado, Utah, and Oklahoma stay outside $156,120,000 even when activity later crosses those lines. The code does not convert $156.1 million into a charging-station atlas.

New Mexico federal spending is the all-program parent. 66.959 is one row on New Mexico programs. $156.1 million is not the state’s complete federal footprint. Open Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program in New Mexico for the filtered table, CFDA 66.959 for the catalog without a New Mexico filter, and All spending ties for other pairs. Do not add those parents into $156,120,000.

When awardCount equals one

When there is one award, average obligation equals $156,120,000. There is no distribution to summarize. The figure is still an obligation aggregate, not an outlay, and not proof that every dollar has been drawn. Downward modifications, if they exist in the raw file, are already netted into the total supplied in the facts.

Treat 1 as a record count in an aggregate, not as 1 finished program year. Without a transaction register on this page, you cannot see whether the row is a continuation, renewal, or correction. Later ingests can restate $156,120,000 without changing the join key of 66.959 and NM. USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $156,120,000 is the net total supplied in the facts. The pair remains Zero Emission Technologies Grants plus New Mexico. Do not treat $156,120,000 as an outlay series.

What New Mexico zero-emission grants do not prove

A large 66.959 total tagged to New Mexico does not measure whether New Mexico emissions fell, and it does not equal equipment already installed. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. Correlation is not causation. The headline remains $156,120,000 on 1 award for Zero Emission Technologies Grants in New Mexico.

Keep both sides of the join: Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program and New Mexico, obligations only. Do not annualize $156,120,000 without a year field—this packet publishes none. Do not treat 1 as a project, utility, or named-grantee census. Quote USAspending.gov and the overlay path rather than a solar-farm narrative. Cite Zero Emission Technologies Grants together with New Mexico whenever you reuse $156,120,000.

Citing CFDA 66.959 in New Mexico

The overlay target is the New Mexico × CFDA 66.959 table. Open Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program in New Mexico when you want the same $156,120,000 / 1-award cell in the site’s data chrome. CFDA 66.959 drops the New Mexico filter. New Mexico federal spending drops the CFDA filter. New Mexico programs lists other catalogs beside 66.959. All spending ties indexes other pairs.

This page exists because two tables meet: a CFDA program and a place-of-performance state. It does not exist to argue that New Mexico won or lost federal money, that donations paid for the awards, or that obligations equal cash. The pair is 66.959 plus NM. Obligations of $156,120,000 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 66.959 × NM pair. 1 remains an award-record count, not a person, facility, or project census. Section 134(a)(1) is catalog language, not a statute walkthrough. One New Mexico award of $156,120,000 is a single instrument, not a project roster. Albuquerque folklore is not a Bernalillo County split. Texas-coded GGRF awards stay outside. Recipients stay unpublished. Do not merge the Nevada 66.959 cell into this NM overlay.

Questions

How much Zero Emission Technologies Grant funding is obligated in New Mexico?

USAspending records $156,120,000 in CFDA 66.959 obligations with New Mexico place of performance on 1 award. That is the pair total, not an outlay. Keep Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program and New Mexico together when citing $156,120,000.

Does 1 award mean 1 New Mexico utility?

The facts show 1 award totaling $156,120,000. Pass-throughs of this type often post as a single large assistance instrument. Recipient names are not in the packet facts. With one award, the mean equals the total. 1 is a record count, not a person or facility census.

Is this New Mexico's total federal EPA spending?

No. This join is CFDA 66.959 only. Other Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund strands use different CFDA numbers on separate New Mexico program pages. Nationwide 66.959 is not limited to New Mexico. Obligations of $156,120,000 are not outlays. The overlay is the live Zero Emission Technologies Grants–New Mexico table.

Has this grant money already been spent on equipment?

No. $156,120,000 is an obligation sum. Outlays are a different USAspending series. Drawdowns can lag the federal obligation. This packet has no outlay total. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 66.959 × NM pair. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.